SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The retool begins

Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 4 juin 2020
Publié: 4 juin 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Basically, embrace the tank in 20-21

Put Dell, TVR, Brassard and Kane and see what you can get for them
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
44 250 000 $
31 250 000 $
1900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 250 000 $
1900 000 $
12 250 000 $
12 250 000 $
11 750 000 $
11 750 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Perfetti, Cole
3925 000 $
Barron, Justin
3850 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Oesterle, Jordan
  2. Steenbergen, Tyler
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (ARI)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
ARI
  1. Burns, Brent (1 750 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (WSH)
Détails additionnels:
It's the Sharks' last chance of trading Burns and getting something pretty big for it... basically they get a bottom pairing d-man who can contribute offensively (that way he could replace some of the offense left behind by Burns), they get a C+ prospect in Steenbergen, a 1st rounder but move down in 2021

They still get 2 picks back and we all know what SJ will do with mid/late picks, they'll draft top-4 d-men and top-6 forwards so nothing to worry about here
2.
SJS
  1. Bryson, Jacob
  2. Mittelstadt, Casey [Droits de RFA]
  3. Okposo, Kyle
  4. Thompson, Tage [Droits de RFA]
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
  6. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
BUF
  1. Hertl, Tomas
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (COL)
3.
SJS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
Anywhere
4.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (FLA)
FLA
  1. Sörensen, Marcus
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TBL
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de ARI
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de FLA
Logo de SJS
Logo de ANA
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $73 793 333 $0 $277 500 $7 706 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
900 000 $900 000 $
C
UFA - 3
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 juin 2020 à 11 h 10
#26
Démarrer sujet
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
Quoting: Saskleaf
Ouch.😕


Yeah...

EK has a 11,5 mil cap hit until his 35-26 years old season
Vlasic has a 7 mil cap hit until his 39 years old season
Burns has a 8 mil cap until until his his 39-40 years old season... let that sink in
4 juin 2020 à 11 h 29
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 64
Mentions "j'aime": 32
Trading Hertl ? That's obviously not happening. Plus, I'd rather trade Vlasic over Burns.

Okposo and Brassard as our top 3 RW ? Lol yeah right
papishark a aimé ceci.
4 juin 2020 à 11 h 34
#28
Démarrer sujet
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
Quoting: Eldoser
Trading Hertl ? That's obviously not happening. Plus, I'd rather trade Vlasic over Burns.

Okposo and Brassard as our top 3 RW ? Lol yeah right


NOBODY will trade for Vlasic dude. Nobody.

And that’s what tanking is all about
4 juin 2020 à 13 h 4
#29
AllJonedOut
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,463
Mentions "j'aime": 266
Quoting: Lord_Simek
This team was in the conference finals last year and to be honest if Karlsson, Pavelski and Hertl we're healthy back then, the Blues would not have won the cup.


I love this team. But last postseason. In the WCF. The blues wanted it more. And destiny was theres. Games 4,5 and 6 were so embarrassing to watch. We were injuries but they wanted it more.
4 juin 2020 à 13 h 12
#30
Bad Take Bot v1.02
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 2,684
Mentions "j'aime": 1,881
For a rebuild this is a good start, I would think Couture is more likely to go than Hertl, other than that, no notable problems.
4 juin 2020 à 13 h 13
#31
Démarrer sujet
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
Quoting: Klara
For a rebuild this is a good start, I would think Couture is more likely to go than Hertl, other than that, no notable problems.


Eh...

IMO Couture is a keeper, his leadership and experience will guide the youth for the long term future
4 juin 2020 à 14 h 15
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Pass on the buffalo trade. Why do we take back Okposo and give up a second? If you think Tage Thompson intices anyone you’re wrong. I’d be okay with taking back Okposo in a rebuild scenario but your going to have to bump what we get back, not what we give
Lord_Simek a aimé ceci.
4 juin 2020 à 14 h 17
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
Eh...

IMO Couture is a keeper, his leadership and experience will guide the youth for the long term future

That’s a terrible way to look at a rebuild. Couture is 30 now and in the prime of his career. He should be moved right away for the highest price possible. Hertl is only 26 and very likely to stick with the sharks long term. Hertl is the perfect guy to build your team around if he stays more healthy
4 juin 2020 à 14 h 35
#34
Démarrer sujet
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
Quoting: papishark
That’s a terrible way to look at a rebuild. Couture is 30 now and in the prime of his career. He should be moved right away for the highest price possible. Hertl is only 26 and very likely to stick with the sharks long term. Hertl is the perfect guy to build your team around if he stays more healthy


Right but would you guys get as much for Couture as you would get for Hertl considering he's 4 years older?
4 juin 2020 à 15 h 34
#35
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
Right but would you guys get as much for Couture as you would get for Hertl considering he's 4 years older?

No but your going to struggle much more to find a replacement Hertl, and Hertl will still be a great player when the rebuild is done, whereas Couture will be done
4 juin 2020 à 15 h 49
#36
G O S I M E K
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 930
Mentions "j'aime": 368
Quoting: Ihaveajoner
I love this team. But last postseason. In the WCF. The blues wanted it more. And destiny was theres. Games 4,5 and 6 were so embarrassing to watch. We were injuries but they wanted it more.


Typically when 3 of your 5 best players are not playing, you're going to lose. Vlasic was also playing injured. We rarely agree on anything but I will have to disagree again, if healthy, Karlsson healthy in that series, Sharks would have won the cup. Analysts around the league said the same thing.
4 juin 2020 à 15 h 51
#37
G O S I M E K
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 930
Mentions "j'aime": 368
Quoting: Klara
For a rebuild this is a good start, I would think Couture is more likely to go than Hertl, other than that, no notable problems.


neither of them are likely to go in a rebuild or "re tool" scenario. Which doesn't really matter because the sharks are not rebuilding. A lousy season and every gm on capfriendly thinks there is a rebuild looming.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage