SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What a Getzlaf trade would look like

Créé par: LosPatos
Équipe: 2019-20 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 4 juin 2020
Publié: 4 juin 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
ANA
  1. Bennett, Sam
  2. Koumontzis, Demetrios [Liste de réserve]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
Late 1st rounder
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de CGY
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $55 779 457 $0 $1 332 500 $25 720 543 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
820 000 $820 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 8
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 200 000 $$1M)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
675 000 $675 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 166 $894 166 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 juin 2020 à 3 h 53
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Interesting, CGY need an offensive 2C
4 juin 2020 à 3 h 53
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,913
Mentions "j'aime": 19,289
He won't waive to anywhere but yeah that seems accurate for a top 6 center rental
4 juin 2020 à 6 h 2
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
If you would have said a 2nd I would have been like ok.
But this is a massive over payment for a 35 year old guy who has been a 40 pt guy the past 2 years. At 8+ million a year, 40 point production sucks ass.
He is no longer a top 6 center. On top of it it's a rental 1 year and at 35, the odds of extension really are more dangerous than it's worth, especially if he expects to make anything like his current deal that he's not worth.

He is in all honesty, a bad contract to hold. For 8+ million in FA this year, you can find better production.
zyyyp a aimé ceci.
4 juin 2020 à 9 h 15
#4
Kings v5 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 4,767
Mentions "j'aime": 1,625
The ducks certainly have the cap space to retain 50% of his contract. I can't think of on steam who doesnt need what Getzlaf brings for 4.125 million. They could get a huge return for him
LosPatos a aimé ceci.
4 juin 2020 à 12 h 55
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,449
Mentions "j'aime": 6,101
I agree this would be a good trade as long as the Ducks retained heavily on Getzlaf's contract.
LosPatos a aimé ceci.
4 juin 2020 à 14 h 43
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 910
Mentions "j'aime": 208
Quoting: pharrow
If you would have said a 2nd I would have been like ok.
But this is a massive over payment for a 35 year old guy who has been a 40 pt guy the past 2 years. At 8+ million a year, 40 point production sucks ass.
He is no longer a top 6 center. On top of it it's a rental 1 year and at 35, the odds of extension really are more dangerous than it's worth, especially if he expects to make anything like his current deal that he's not worth.

He is in all honesty, a bad contract to hold. For 8+ million in FA this year, you can find better production.


He plays for the Ducks who barely score 2 goals a game when they win. He isn't going to produce 65 points plus per season when the rest of his team isn't playing offense.
Put him with Gaudreau, he clips 70 plus points with ease. When the ducks made the WCF in 17, he had 73 points.

Is he a rental? Absolutely but if he gets to be the 2C, he can do a lot of damage by not having as tough matchups and CGY would have 2 strong lines.
LosPatos a aimé ceci.
4 juin 2020 à 20 h 34
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: awatt
He plays for the Ducks who barely score 2 goals a game when they win. He isn't going to produce 65 points plus per season when the rest of his team isn't playing offense.
Put him with Gaudreau, he clips 70 plus points with ease. When the ducks made the WCF in 17, he had 73 points.

Is he a rental? Absolutely but if he gets to be the 2C, he can do a lot of damage by not having as tough matchups and CGY would have 2 strong lines.


no just no.
There are a lot of guys who are popping off more than 40 points a year with little help.
The problem isn't everyone else around him. It's that he's 35 years old trying to keep up with some 22 year old kids on the ice.
This is why these old ass players keep getting weeded out.
There are very few players in the league above 34 that are actually productive. Some recently turned 34.
Here is the whole list of guys 34 and above.
https://www.capfriendly.com/browse/active/2020/points&limits=age-34-46
Only 2 even close to being a PPG player are OV and Bergy.
You got 3 above .7 ppg. And then a whole lot of salary for rapidly declining players.
Meanwhile, you are gonna tell me he's worth 8 mil a year? Hell no he's not.
He's slotted right there with a slew of people who are in rapid decline.
He's not the player he use to be. That's not because of everyone else around him. It's because he's 35 freaking years old.

You look at that whole list of 35+ and you see how sad the lot are. That's his future because it's already the now.
Why the hell would anyone give up that much for him.
They wouldn't. He's not worth nearly what they are asking here.
A 2nd. That's what he's probably worth. At trade deadline with ANA retaining cap.
4 juin 2020 à 23 h 48
#8
Beanmachine
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,483
Mentions "j'aime": 497
The day the flames give up the 16 OA pick and Bennett for a 35 year old $8M player who is averaging 40 points a season now is The day Treliving is tossed out the front door. Ridiculous proposal.
5 juin 2020 à 0 h 7
#9
Démarrer sujet
LosPatos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,315
Mentions "j'aime": 1,823
Quoting: InTreWeTrust
The day the flames give up the 16 OA pick and Bennett for a 35 year old $8M player who is averaging 40 points a season now is The day Treliving is tossed out the front door. Ridiculous proposal.


1) we’d be retaining
2) Getzlaf puts up more than that
3) Getzlaf is a better center than most of centers on Calgary
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage