SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next year - moves with MTL BUF ANA NYR

Créé par: justaBoss
Équipe: 2020-21 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 3 juin 2020
Publié: 3 juin 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 000 000 $
22 500 000 $
21 000 000 $
1750 750 $
1735 000 $
1735 000 $
1735 000 $
1735 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
56 000 000 $
55 750 000 $
45 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Chatfield, Jalen [Droits de RFA]
  2. Eriksson, Loui
  3. Gadjovich, Jonah
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
2.
BUF
  1. Jasek, Lukas
  2. Sutter, Brandon
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
3.
VAN
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (ANA)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
ANA
  1. Baertschi, Sven
  2. Goldobin, Nikolay [Droits de RFA]
  3. Stecher, Troy [Droits de RFA]
4.
VAN
  1. Fontaine, Gabriel [Droits de RFA]
  2. Nieves, Cristoval [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2020 (VAN)
NYR
  1. Motte, Tyler [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2020 (ANA)
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de VAN
Logo de ANA
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de ANA
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $80 645 212 $1 700 000 $3 700 000 $854 788 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 875 000 $3 875 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
735 000 $735 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 juin 2020 à 22 h 13
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,880
Mentions "j'aime": 6,386
I wouldn't bring Tanev back for that term or caphit
3 juin 2020 à 22 h 13
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 6,103
Mentions "j'aime": 2,240
Don't think Montreal has any interest in that trade.

It's basically a 1st + Erikson for Kulak. Unless that pick is a top 10 pick, that contract is absolutely not worth it.
SevenLeg a aimé ceci.
3 juin 2020 à 22 h 16
#3
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,572
Mentions "j'aime": 6,714
all 3 players in NYR trade are AHLers so I don't see a need?
3 juin 2020 à 22 h 19
#4
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: Kakko_to_New_York
all 3 players in NYR trade are AHLers so I don't see a need?


Yeah it ain't that substantial. Just needed some C's
3 juin 2020 à 22 h 20
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,292
Mentions "j'aime": 2,340
Sabres trade their 2nd best RHD Behind Jokiharju for a bad NHL player and a bad prospect. I think they would decline this offer although you never know with Jason Botterill.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
3 juin 2020 à 22 h 24
#6
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: HabsForEver
Don't think Montreal has any interest in that trade.

It's basically a 1st + Erikson for Kulak. Unless that pick is a top 10 pick, that contract is absolutely not worth it.


There's two years left on that contract. Getting a first+some prospects as a compensation seems reasonable. Could add some conditions to the pick though, such as if the pick is TOP3 VAN retains the pick and gives out 2022 1st rounder, or if VAN gets to the playoffs in 2021 MTL has the option to take the 2022 pick instead that is TOP8 protected and if that won't apply then MTL receives a 2023 1st with no conditions.
3 juin 2020 à 22 h 25
#7
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: Sabres923
Sabres trade their 2nd best RHD Behind Jokiharju for a bad NHL player and a bad prospect. I think they would decline this offer although you never know with Jason Botterill.


Imo they're better off trading Miller now rather than losing him for free in the ED.
3 juin 2020 à 22 h 26
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 6,103
Mentions "j'aime": 2,240
Quoting: justaBoss
There's two years left on that contract. Getting a first+some prospects as a compensation seems reasonable. Could add some conditions to the pick though, such as if the pick is TOP3 VAN retains the pick and gives out 2022 1st rounder, or if VAN gets to the playoffs in 2021 MTL has the option to take the 2022 pick instead that is TOP8 protected and if that won't apply then MTL receives a 2023 1st with no conditions.


Considering what the canes got for 1 year of Marleau, I don't think this trade is fair. Especially considering the contracts that Montreal will have to give out in the next 2 years.
3 juin 2020 à 22 h 28
#9
Am Yisrael Chai
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 18,572
Mentions "j'aime": 6,714
Quoting: justaBoss
Yeah it ain't that substantial. Just needed some C's


IG we do it since the ANA pick is higher
3 juin 2020 à 22 h 34
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,292
Mentions "j'aime": 2,340
Quoting: justaBoss
Imo they're better off trading Miller now rather than losing him for free in the ED.

I’m sure they could get a better offer.
OldNYIfan et gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
3 juin 2020 à 22 h 56
#11
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 16,165
Mentions "j'aime": 20,487
That team looks good which means that the first round pick you're sending to the Habs won't be that high. The basis of the trade isn't bad but there's no real incentive. Maybe change the prospects for MacEwen/Juolevi/Woo/Lind
Howisjulienstillhere a aimé ceci.
3 juin 2020 à 23 h 4
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,680
Mentions "j'aime": 1,448
Quoting: SevenLeg
That team looks good which means that the first round pick you're sending to the Habs won't be that high. The basis of the trade isn't bad but there's no real incentive. Maybe change the prospects for MacEwen/Juolevi/Woo/Lind


Gadjovic could be nice. But a better prospect with him
4 juin 2020 à 0 h 26
#13
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,124
Mentions "j'aime": 25,039
We'll give you our 2021 third for Stecher. You can give us your 2021 second for Baertschi. Goldobin stays with you.
4 juin 2020 à 0 h 40
#14
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,192
Mentions "j'aime": 9,012
Sabres dont have disposable cap space. they pass
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
4 juin 2020 à 3 h 20
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 5,120
Mentions "j'aime": 1,850
Quoting: justaBoss
Imo they're better off trading Miller now rather than losing him for free in the ED.


That doesn’t mean we’d take Sutter for him
We need a 2C, not a 3C
And RW2 is our next “need”
That 4mil is just needed to be used elsewhere

Jasek is a nothing prospect
To put it comparatively...
u guys have Justin Bailey, who basically doubled Jasek’s production last year in the minors,
and we gave Bailey away a few years ago
So if we didn’t want him, tough to imagine Jasek having any value to us at all

Maybe if u just did Miller for a 2nd, but i don’t even know then?
Sabres might be looking to move Ristolainen or Montour for top6 help, which means we’d likely keep Miller

Now if u offered Gaudette.... that might be interesting?
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
4 juin 2020 à 4 h 7
#16
Démarrer sujet
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,709
Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
Quoting: Jdfitz77
That doesn’t mean we’d take Sutter for him
We need a 2C, not a 3C
And RW2 is our next “need”
That 4mil is just needed to be used elsewhere

Jasek is a nothing prospect
To put it comparatively...
u guys have Justin Bailey, who basically doubled Jasek’s production last year in the minors,
and we gave Bailey away a few years ago
So if we didn’t want him, tough to imagine Jasek having any value to us at all

Maybe if u just did Miller for a 2nd, but i don’t even know then?
Sabres might be looking to move Ristolainen or Montour for top6 help, which means we’d likely keep Miller

Now if u offered Gaudette.... that might be interesting?


Nah. Not worth it. Imo Miller is worth 2nd. Also you're lacking 4th liners.
4 juin 2020 à 9 h 49
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 5,120
Mentions "j'aime": 1,850
Quoting: justaBoss
Nah. Not worth it. Imo Miller is worth 2nd. Also you're lacking 4th liners.


Not at all if we resign Larsson & Girgensons
Their line with Okposo was played like a 3rd line,
but with hopefully adding 1 or 2 top6 guys & kids like Cozens & Mittelstadt coming up,
they’ll be one of the best 4th lines in all of hockey

And also,
u don’t trade quality defensemen for 4th liners

Zero interest in Sutter, none
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
4 juin 2020 à 15 h 55
#18
Evans truther
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,506
Mentions "j'aime": 1,434
Yeah could easily get behind that Montreal deal but remove Chatfield and put a capable prospect like one of Lind, Rafferty or maybe Rathbone to really make the deal interesting. A late 1st and two good prospects for 12M$ seems fair for both sides to me, don't know if Montreal would give Kulak as he's well liked around here so maybe they'd just give a pick back but I wouldn't mind/care.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage