SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

NYR BUF trades

Créé par: JonataanP
Équipe: 2020-21 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 2 juin 2020
Publié: 2 juin 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2800 000 $
22 000 000 $
33 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Lundkvist, Nils [Liste de réserve]
  2. Staal, Marc
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (NYR)
2.
ANA
  1. Pilut, Lawrence [Droits de RFA]
  2. Thompson, Tage [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (BUF)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de NYR
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de BUF
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $65 891 249 $0 $0 $15 608 751 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 700 000 $5 700 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
822 500 $822 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 juin 2020 à 20 h 42
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,735
Mentions "j'aime": 1,985
I think there maybe a lot of merit to the Buffalo deal, but Pilut is more than a career AHLer..... the ask of a first is reaching. A 2nd yes. But a 1st is reaching.
2 juin 2020 à 20 h 49
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,115
Mentions "j'aime": 14,135
Buffalo says yes with some protection on the 1st
2 juin 2020 à 20 h 51
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 40
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Quoting: swinny
I think there maybe a lot of merit to the Buffalo deal, but Pilut is more than a career AHLer..... the ask of a first is reaching. A 2nd yes. But a 1st is reaching.


I don't think the Ducks would even consider trading Rakell if the deal wasn't including a 1st or a top prospect. I like Thomson's potential, but he's had a rough start in the league
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
2 juin 2020 à 21 h 0
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,735
Mentions "j'aime": 1,985
Quoting: JonataanP
I don't think the Ducks would even consider trading Rakell if the deal wasn't including a 1st or a top prospect. I like Thomson's potential, but he's had a rough start in the league


If the 1st is included, I would be offering something other than Pilut. I like Rackell a lot, but that seems awefully steep. Even if a 4th came back, it would look like a very good deal.
2 juin 2020 à 21 h 2
#5
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,166
Mentions "j'aime": 8,983
Not giving up a 1st for Rackell
2 juin 2020 à 21 h 4
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 40
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Quoting: swinny
If the 1st is included, I would be offering something other than Pilut. I like Rackell a lot, but that seems awefully steep. Even if a 4th came back, it would look like a very good deal.


How high do you value Pilut? Potential top 4?
2 juin 2020 à 21 h 12
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 40
Mentions "j'aime": 12
Quoting: Shibbal18
Not giving up a 1st for Rackell


Considering his production the last two seasons maybe a first would be too much. He's a former 30+ scorer tho and I think he could bounce back. He's still in a good age with a team friendly contract.
2 juin 2020 à 21 h 13
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,735
Mentions "j'aime": 1,985
Quoting: JonataanP
How high do you value Pilut? Potential top 4?


I beleive he does have that potential yes. Sabres blueline is deep. Pilut buried as a result of numbers.

If I was a betting man, most Sabres fans would sooner move McCabe over Pilut. Been a 0.75 ppg pace for 2 seasons in Rochester with a strong defensive game to boot. Been an issue of how do you play him ahead of Dahlin, Risto, Miller, Montour, McCabe and Jokiharju???
2 juin 2020 à 21 h 15
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,735
Mentions "j'aime": 1,985
Quoting: JonataanP
Considering his production the last two seasons maybe a first would be too much. He's a former 30+ scorer tho and I think he could bounce back. He's still in a good age with a team friendly contract.


Think his production over the last two years is a function of the Ducks being terrible.

Great player, but I don't think he can carry a line either. The 1st I think is right, or Pilut is right. Both...... I dunno.
2 juin 2020 à 21 h 20
#10
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
Both trades are bad for ANA. Lindholm is worth more than this and both players coming from BUF are meh. Also Pilut is apparently heading to KHL.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
2 juin 2020 à 22 h 1
#11
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,166
Mentions "j'aime": 8,983
Quoting: swinny
I beleive he does have that potential yes. Sabres blueline is deep. Pilut buried as a result of numbers.

If I was a betting man, most Sabres fans would sooner move McCabe over Pilut. Been a 0.75 ppg pace for 2 seasons in Rochester with a strong defensive game to boot. Been an issue of how do you play him ahead of Dahlin, Risto, Miller, Montour, McCabe and Jokiharju???


I wouldn't take that bet, Pilut has already threatened to walk and no one cared. Pilut is good, he isnt big enough or have the tools to work anyone off the puck, his assets are in his skating and positioning, so if he doesnt start producing hes replaceable, but he has the talent to start producing if given a legit chance
2 juin 2020 à 22 h 3
#12
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,166
Mentions "j'aime": 8,983
Quoting: swinny
Think his production over the last two years is a function of the Ducks being terrible.

Great player, but I don't think he can carry a line either. The 1st I think is right, or Pilut is right. Both...... I dunno.


Is his production bad in part due to them being bad or are they bad in part due to his production being bad
2 juin 2020 à 22 h 5
#13
Shibbal18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2016
Messages: 25,166
Mentions "j'aime": 8,983
Quoting: justaBoss
Both trades are bad for ANA. Lindholm is worth more than this and both players coming from BUF are meh. Also Pilut is apparently heading to KHL.


Pilut may have been bluffing to get a better contract.
2 juin 2020 à 22 h 22
#14
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,662
Mentions "j'aime": 24,576
Quoting: Shibbal18
Not giving up a 1st for Rackell


That's fine; CapFriendly Rule #1: If you can't spell him, you can't have him.
Shibbal18 et mytduxfan a aimé ceci.
2 juin 2020 à 22 h 27
#15
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,662
Mentions "j'aime": 24,576
Lindholm for Lundkvist and the Rangers' 2020 first is fine. We're not interested in the cap dump with the NMC.

Accepted value of Rakell is Colorado's 2020 first and Connor Timmins; Buffalo's first is too high, so Henri Jokiharju and the 2020 second is acceptable if we add one of our innumerable lefties (W or D). Jacob Larsson is better than Jake McCabe or Lawrence Pilut.
mytduxfan a aimé ceci.
2 juin 2020 à 22 h 49
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,735
Mentions "j'aime": 1,985
Quoting: Shibbal18
Is his production bad in part due to them being bad or are they bad in part due to his production being bad


I think it's the team being bad. But that is merely opinion and by no means backed up by much.
Shibbal18 et JonataanP a aimé ceci.
2 juin 2020 à 22 h 55
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Rangers decline. Lindholm just isn't a good target for the Rangers still rebuilding and Lindholm only with 2 years left.

Though if you want a Howden for Mahura trade we'll entertain that.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage