SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Making trades now

Créé par: NJ11
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 29 mai 2020
Publié: 29 mai 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Move Labanc to restock prospect pool. Additional contracts for space and picks. Depth is still a little meh but the top 6 is better and the blue line should benefit from having Ferraro and Karlsson play together. Soucy and Rutta add depth but will also be pushed by one of either Merkely or Pasichnuk for a roster spot. Khudobin adds a good back who can share the workload with Jones.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
33 250 000 $
2925 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
46 000 000 $
1700 000 $
2850 000 $
23 150 000 $
33 000 000 $
21 850 000 $
11 050 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (DAL)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (CBJ)
OTT
  1. Labanc, Kevin
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (NJD)
3.
SJS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (DET)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
4.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TBL
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de CBJ
Logo de DAL
Logo de DET
Logo de NJD
Logo de EDM
Logo de BUF
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de BUF
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $74 264 999 $0 $1 492 500 $7 235 001 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 mai 2020 à 17 h 36
#1
Brace for the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 12,840
Mentions "j'aime": 6,647
OOOF, that's nowhere near enough for Labanc... more like Shane Bowers and another asset for Labanc

DET takes it and runs, you would get a lot more for Simek
29 mai 2020 à 17 h 42
#2
Démarrer sujet
JonesIS(not)aStarter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 135
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
OOOF, that's nowhere near enough for Labanc... more like Shane Bowers and another asset for Labanc

DET takes it and runs, you would get a lot more for Simek


Yeah, I could see us getting more for Labanc but I don't know which prospect they'd part with. Bowers is in Colorado. Simek might be able to fetch a second-rounder but honestly getting an early third and fourth may have more value than just a second. Either way, I think having 4 second rounders and 6 picks in the top 90 will be incredibly important in restocking the prospect pool while also freeing up space and adding players who can help them make the playoffs next year. They should maximize the number of picks they can get this draft imo.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
29 mai 2020 à 17 h 42
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,075
Mentions "j'aime": 1,486
Devils aren't giving a 4th for Sorensen
29 mai 2020 à 17 h 49
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,884
Mentions "j'aime": 11,896
I would rather keep those 2nds and make a bigger package for a better player than Labanc. I don't see the value for Ottawa.
NJ11 a aimé ceci.
29 mai 2020 à 17 h 53
#5
Démarrer sujet
JonesIS(not)aStarter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 135
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
I would rather keep those 2nds and make a bigger package for a better player than Labanc. I don't see the value for Ottawa.


For a player that scored 56 points just a year ago, at the cap hit he'll probably sign for, and considering the sens owner and his penny-pinching ways, I think the trade makes a lot of sense.
OldNYIfan et FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
29 mai 2020 à 18 h 2
#6
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,688
Mentions "j'aime": 24,611
I like your trades. I like the strategy, too,
29 mai 2020 à 18 h 22
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,884
Mentions "j'aime": 11,896
Quoting: NJ11
For a player that scored 56 points just a year ago, at the cap hit he'll probably sign for, and considering the sens owner and his penny-pinching ways, I think the trade makes a lot of sense.


I just don't think he's as good as some people think he is.
29 mai 2020 à 19 h 11
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
We get dicked on all these deals. Labanc is worth a late first, not two late seconds
29 mai 2020 à 19 h 44
#9
Démarrer sujet
JonesIS(not)aStarter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 135
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: papishark
We get dicked on all these deals. Labanc is worth a late first, not two late seconds


Would you take a late first pick or two picks between 45-55? At that stage quantity over quality especially considering players that might drop in that range. Maybe I could have asked for more in the Simek trade but Gambrell and Sorenson won't fetch more. I know fans won't be happy but ultimately it's a net positive having 5 picks in the top 60 from a stacked draft class and additional picks in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th round where they can also swing for the fences on boom or bust prospects. Labanc is great I'd love to keep him but to add two quality picks for him is fair imo. Simek is ok but replaceable and i'd really like to see Ferraro in an elevated role while cycling in younger guys. With Merkley, Pasichnuk, Knaizev, and potentially some picks from this upcoming draft, the future for this blueline in the next 3 years looks good. Overall I respect your view but I think the ability to add picks here while still constructing a competitive roster allows the best chance for this team to improve moving forward.
29 mai 2020 à 19 h 49
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: NJ11
Would you take a late first pick or two picks between 45-55? At that stage quantity over quality especially considering players that might drop in that range. Maybe I could have asked for more in the Simek trade but Gambrell and Sorenson won't fetch more. I know fans won't be happy but ultimately it's a net positive having 5 picks in the top 60 from a stacked draft class and additional picks in the 3rd, 4th, and 5th round where they can also swing for the fences on boom or bust prospects. Labanc is great I'd love to keep him but to add two quality picks for him is fair imo. Simek is ok but replaceable and i'd really like to see Ferraro in an elevated role while cycling in younger guys. With Merkley, Pasichnuk, Knaizev, and potentially some picks from this upcoming draft, the future for this blueline in the next 3 years looks good. Overall I respect your view but I think the ability to add picks here while still constructing a competitive roster allows the best chance for this team to improve moving forward.


Ill be honest I dont really like having one right hander on the whole forward core. I also dont know if you can expect Haula to be able to handle a 2c role as he has not been very good recently. Also I dont see the need to trade Simek right away as he provides a stablizing presence on D, and physicality that none of our other D have.
30 mai 2020 à 15 h 21
#11
Démarrer sujet
JonesIS(not)aStarter
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 135
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: papishark
Ill be honest I dont really like having one right hander on the whole forward core. I also dont know if you can expect Haula to be able to handle a 2c role as he has not been very good recently. Also I dont see the need to trade Simek right away as he provides a stablizing presence on D, and physicality that none of our other D have.


Yeah I’ll agree that we don’t have enough righty’s, as it relates to Haula I just put him there so we could load up the first line with as much talent as possible. Hertl, Meier, and Couture would garner all the attention from top lines and pairings, so Haula would have easier competition and with Kane and Toffoli flanking him, that line would be pretty darn good imo. If it doesn’t work out you could always move Toffoli up, slot Hertl back at 2C, and shift Haula to the wing. He’s a versatile forward and at 3 mil is a good investment if they get him at that price. Simek is good but I think they can replace him with Soucy honestly and give Ferraro more minutes. That’s just my opinion but I think having mobile defenders means spending less time on the boards and in your own zone which also means you don’t need to have a lot of physicality. It won’t happen yet obviously but a Ferraro and Karlsson pairing is the way the sharks need to go imo. That is the future! Honestly I’d be ecstatic if Merkley made it too but thats not likely so having soucy and Rutta as stop gaps should fill those rolls while prospects develop in a year or two.

Just my opinion though, I can see why having more physical presence would appeal to people because it offers a stylistic variance. But I think committing fully to speed and mobility on the blue line will mask the lack of speed in the forwards.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage