SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Smashville

Créé par: JumboFett
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 29 mai 2020
Publié: 29 mai 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Another outside projection to see how things work. Albeit, it's late and I got lazy on the LW.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
43 250 000 $
2825 000 $
2725 000 $
1700 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1850 000 $
1700 000 $
23 500 000 $
2850 000 $
21 300 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (ARI)
3.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (TOR)
TOR
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TBL
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de ARI
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $72 635 833 $0 $622 500 $8 864 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
825 000 $825 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Predators de Nashville
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 mai 2020 à 4 h 42
#1
Terry_AkiSauce
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 3,421
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
You'd have to add a bit I think to that Ellis trade even though you're taking Turris, smart idea though
howdy_hwdn et JumboFett a aimé ceci.
29 mai 2020 à 5 h 29
#2
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
No thanks from Preds. Ellis is too good to give up.
gmgb a aimé ceci.
29 mai 2020 à 8 h 5
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 39
Mentions "j'aime": 4
Yeah Ellis is good but the sharks would be taking on Turris, which would make the the overall value go down.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
29 mai 2020 à 8 h 50
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,532
Mentions "j'aime": 5,127
If Nashville wanted to pay an aging defenseman $8M until he's 40, they would have just kept Weber.
justaBoss et ZPirtle a aimé ceci.
29 mai 2020 à 13 h 32
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 1,421
Mentions "j'aime": 313
Quoting: gmgb
If Nashville wanted to pay an aging defenseman $8M until he's 40, they would have just kept Weber.


Burns is better than Ellis, and Weber; he'll produce double the points Ellis does, and he won't miss half the season due to injury like Weber. He'll also still be playing at 40+ due to his elite fitness.

Where I like Ellis and why I'm entertaining this trade is what Ellis brings defensively. NSH, on the other hand, has room to add an Off-D, as long as they put up good numbers, unlike Subban.
29 mai 2020 à 18 h 24
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,532
Mentions "j'aime": 5,127
Quoting: JumboFett
Burns is better than Ellis, and Weber; he'll produce double the points Ellis does, and he won't miss half the season due to injury like Weber. He'll also still be playing at 40+ due to his elite fitness.

Where I like Ellis and why I'm entertaining this trade is what Ellis brings defensively. NSH, on the other hand, has room to add an Off-D, as long as they put up good numbers, unlike Subban.


Burns isn't better than Ellis right now, and I doubt he ever will be again. This proposal only makes sense for Nashville if Turris continues to play like he did under Laviolette. But after putting 18-19's injuries behind him and getting out of Lavi's doghouse, he's a strong candidate to regain his form. He was already playing much better after Hynes took over and started giving him icetime again. I've got more faith in Turris turning his game around, than I do in Burns not regressing more than he already has. If he doesn't, NJ might not be generous enough to bail the Preds again.
29 mai 2020 à 20 h 28
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 1,421
Mentions "j'aime": 313
Quoting: gmgb
Burns isn't better than Ellis right now, and I doubt he ever will be again. This proposal only makes sense for Nashville if Turris continues to play like he did under Laviolette. But after putting 18-19's injuries behind him and getting out of Lavi's doghouse, he's a strong candidate to regain his form. He was already playing much better after Hynes took over and started giving him icetime again. I've got more faith in Turris turning his game around, than I do in Burns not regressing more than he already has. If he doesn't, NJ might not be generous enough to bail the Preds again.


Ok sure... We can revisit this next season and see how you feel then. Besides Burns currently having more points than Ellis in an allegedly regressed year, he also never really sustains long-term injuries. Multiple Norris trophy nominations, including last year where he accrued 99pts between the reg and post-season, and still considered one of the top 3 best defensemen in the league... Fact is, we're probably keeping Burns, and I'm perfectly fine with that.

Do yourself a favor and take a look at his record over the years. He's had a couple down years, but most of the time he coasts above 0.80ppg. He's a beast. Armchair fans of borderline teams can spew all the venom they want, and foment some false hype about how he's finished, but the pros in the league know him and know his worth.
30 mai 2020 à 2 h 37
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,532
Mentions "j'aime": 5,127
Quoting: JumboFett
Ok sure... Armchair fans of borderline teams


This is such a wild attempt at an insult, from a fan of a struggling lottery team. Wow.

But jokes aside, by what metric do you think Burns is still a top 3 dman? He's not in the top ten in scoring (his 7 more points in 21 more games isn't close to double Ellis' points, like you claim), and that's all he's good for. He can't defend. That's an important part of a defenseman's job.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage