SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Realistic besides maybe the draft picks in the trades

Créé par: Snowden89
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 28 mai 2020
Publié: 28 mai 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
12 200 000 $
22 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
12 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (NYI)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (NJD)
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de NYI
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de NJD
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $81 209 783 $0 $400 000 $290 217 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
725 000 $725 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 mai 2020 à 8 h 54
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 2,449
Mentions "j'aime": 1,275
Soft group here. Talented but soft.

The perpetual and appropriate comment of "the right side D is still not good enough", applies fully in this scenario as well.

Good enough to make the playoffs. Not good enough to win in the playoffs.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
28 mai 2020 à 9 h 1
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 191
Mentions "j'aime": 13
this is who they have as d men....this is who is signed and most of which just signed new contracts so I am not Dubas here.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
28 mai 2020 à 9 h 7
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 2,449
Mentions "j'aime": 1,275
Quoting: Snowden89
this is who they have as d men....this is who is signed and most of which just signed new contracts so I am not Dubas here.


Exactly.

It is a really skilled and talented offensive group, with a really solid left side of the D Core and a subpar right side of the D Core.

Last time I checked, Joe Thornton had not in fact signed with the team, so there's that too.

I'm not sure that investing that kind of money in a 40+ year old Thornton is money well spent. The guy has made 109 million dollars in his career. This will not be about money for Joe. He wants a chance to win. This situation probably isn't optimal for a guy like Joe to achieve that.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
28 mai 2020 à 10 h 24
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Contrary to old school mentality being "soft" doesn't really matter anymore. Many like to say the Bruins toughness is why TO loses to them but if you look at last year especially there is completely no evidence of that. They lost by allowing 50% of the power plays end in a goal against. They actually out hit Boston in that series as well. Poor coaching was to blame. The notion teams need to get mean to win is just dead puck era nonsense.
vr1995 a aimé ceci.
28 mai 2020 à 11 h 41
#5
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,695
Mentions "j'aime": 24,617
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Contrary to old school mentality being "soft" doesn't really matter anymore. Many like to say the Bruins toughness is why TO loses to them but if you look at last year especially there is completely no evidence of that. They lost by allowing 50% of the power plays end in a goal against. They actually out hit Boston in that series as well. Poor coaching was to blame. The notion teams need to get mean to win is just dead puck era nonsense.


I think that by "soft" maybe @Trevorchef means the forwards don't come back or otherwise play defense well and the defense lets too many opposing forwards skate right around and sometimes through them, which has always been my observation about the Maple Leafs.
28 mai 2020 à 11 h 43
#6
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,695
Mentions "j'aime": 24,617
Contrary to your title, I think you're very reasonable with the draft picks in your trades; they seem like the right values to me, but Anaheim isn't interested in Kerfoot. The right side of Anaheim's defense is even worse than Toronto's, so the teams are poor trade partners.
28 mai 2020 à 12 h 8
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I think that by "soft" maybe @Trevorchef means the forwards don't come back or otherwise play defense well and the defense lets too many opposing forwards skate right around and sometimes through them, which has always been my observation about the Maple Leafs.


I think that is a grossly unfair assessment. I don't think it was ever that the forwards didn't come back, maybe sometimes but what I saw was this.

This current season under Babs, the strategy was all out pressure all the time everywhere on the ice. Sort of a full court press man to man defence. What I think that often led to in the defensive zone was young players getting caught watching the puck and losing their man who almost always ended up in front of the net with a wide open shot.

Under Keefe the strategy changed to, when defending collapse to the front of the net and protect the middle of the ice. It is more of a zone defence now which the team was still learning but had gotten much better at before the shutdown. I felt that their biggest issue under Keefe was making mistakes in the offensive zone that led to odd man rushes the other way. Players trying to hold the puck a little too long or trying to force a play that wasn't there. They have so much skill that it often works but when it doesn't it really doesn't. That is just an experience thing, they'll learn to better hone in when its smart to try something and when its better to just dump it deep and regroup.

The soft thing is a criticism I hear all the time, "If you hit TO they collapse" no they don't. Having guys that throw huge hits changes a game, no it doesn't. Vancouver throws a tonne of hits but apart from their top line, they get rolled at 5v5. Being a heavy hitting team does nothing if you don't have the talent to do anything when you have the puck. Its a completely overblown thing and a throw back to the dead puck era.

It really shows how uneducated a lot of people are on here when the majority of people who talk about the Leafs say the Bruins Physicality gives the Leafs fits, it certainly didn't. Last year TO outscored them, out chanced them and held the edge in expected goals and possession at 5v5 but was scored on over 50% of their PK's. That and poor coaching, seriously who plays Marleau over Matthews when you are trailing by a goal in the 3rd of game 6. TO even out hit the Bruins in that series and what did that matter? It didn't.
28 mai 2020 à 12 h 33
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 2,449
Mentions "j'aime": 1,275
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I think that by "soft" maybe @Trevorchef means the forwards don't come back or otherwise play defense well and the defense lets too many opposing forwards skate right around and sometimes through them, which has always been my observation about the Maple Leafs.


Exactly.

This isn't about "mean" or "dirty" or fighting. It is about being hard to play against. Finishing checks, battling hard every shift, and not looking completely dejected when things don't go their way.

Soft in the head as much as is stature. It is a state of mind. This group as it is here, doesn't have that to the level that a championship team does.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage