SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

NOT realistic but this would be my ideal team

Créé par: FunMustBeAlways
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 27 mai 2020
Publié: 27 mai 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This isn't supposed to be some sort of realistic projection, just an option that would add players that I personally like a lot.

The Burns trade wound probably not happen, the Montreal one definitely wouldn't and the Leafs one probably would get shot down as well. But in an alternate universe, where everything below is possible, I would absolutely die to have a roster like this.

All subjective.

Anyway, enjoy!
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2700 000 $
2950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
44 000 000 $
21 500 000 $
1700 000 $
44 250 000 $
35 500 000 $
21 000 000 $
32 800 000 $
33 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Dellandrea, Ty
  2. Johns, Stephen
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (DAL)
2.
SJS
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
3.
SJS
  1. Kapanen, Kasperi
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Labanc, Kevin [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (WSH)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (SJS)
4.
SJS
  1. Riikola, Juuso [Droits de RFA]
PIT
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
5.
SJS
  1. Hudon, Charles [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
MTL
  1. Bergmann, Lean
  2. Vlasic, Marc-Édouard (2 100 000 $ retained)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TBL
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $76 860 833 $0 $410 000 $4 639 167 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 3
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 mai 2020 à 18 h 33
#1
AllJonedOut
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,463
Mentions "j'aime": 266
Toronto would take that in eyelash. Montreal rejects obviously. Burns I could definitely see that type of trade. I just don’t see Dallas Wanting him.
27 mai 2020 à 18 h 39
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Quoting: Ihaveajoner
Toronto would take that in eyelash. Montreal rejects obviously. Burns I could definitely see that type of trade. I just don’t see Dallas Wanting him.


I think some Toronto fans would probably beg to differ for various reasons. If I were the Leafs, I would probably take that.

Montreal I didn't feel like concocting a reasonable trade which people would freak out about so I just made up some random sh*t. I'm actually gonna go edit this and make it more realistic.

Only reason I chose Dallas is because that's definitely a place Burns would waive for.
27 mai 2020 à 18 h 44
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 6,270
Mentions "j'aime": 3,025
Dont see any reason Toronto would turn that down assuming a reasonable contract gets agreed to before Labanc moves. The risk there is that he took a massive discount to stay in San Jose for 1 season, hes probably looking for his pay day now.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2020 à 18 h 48
#4
Dubas isnt a genius
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 2,824
Mentions "j'aime": 681
Quoting: Byrr
Dont see any reason Toronto would turn that down assuming a reasonable contract gets agreed to before Labanc moves. The risk there is that he took a massive discount to stay in San Jose for 1 season, hes probably looking for his pay day now.


Quoting: Ihaveajoner
Toronto would take that in eyelash. Montreal rejects obviously. Burns I could definitely see that type of trade. I just don’t see Dallas Wanting him.


Here's the thing, Kapanen is our best penalty killer but that's a kings ransom for him so we accept. However, if LaBanc will cost more then 3-4m we won't be able to afford him so we might have to flip somewhere else for another piece.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2020 à 19 h 27
#5
LafreneiretoKravtsov
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 2,421
Mentions "j'aime": 833
When I made unrealistic rosters of players I like, I usually add good players
27 mai 2020 à 19 h 31
#6
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
Nah. With Burns' contract running until he's 40, think no team is willing to risk it.

If SJ takes a big contract in exchange, then the situation might change.
27 mai 2020 à 20 h 33
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Quoting: Josh
When I made unrealistic rosters of players I like, I usually add good players


The point was making it in the distant realm of possibilities. Of course the first line would be Kucherov - McDavid - Eichel if I could get them all.

Also my favorite players ≠ the best players in the league.
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2020 à 20 h 57
#8
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,556
Mentions "j'aime": 12,310
Man this team would be in way better shape if it keeps Hoffman and doesn't make the Karlsson trade.

Is Zemgus a 3C?

This team looks not bad, still lacks some bottom 6 depth though and the defense looks pretty suspect, goaltending is massively improved obviously, really interested to see what Wilson does this offseason whenever it happens.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2020 à 21 h 21
#9
Hockey Fan13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,914
Mentions "j'aime": 2,487
Team is much improved. I don't think Dallas and Pittsburgh except but I don't follow them closely so my opinion is worth very little.

Also bottom 6 will still likely sink the team but top 6 could be great.
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2020 à 23 h 11
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,204
Mentions "j'aime": 2,861
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
Man this team would be in way better shape if it keeps Hoffman and doesn't make the Karlsson trade.

Is Zemgus a 3C?

This team looks not bad, still lacks some bottom 6 depth though and the defense looks pretty suspect, goaltending is massively improved obviously, really interested to see what Wilson does this offseason whenever it happens.


Is Zemgus a 3C? Yeah I'm not so sure about that one. I chose him because I thought he'd be a bit cheaper and younger than Soderberg. He also had a better advanced stats.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage