SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

CAPFRIENDLY voted playoff bracket part 2 oilers vs Hawks

Créé par: bunzy1034
Équipe: 2019-20 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 27 mai 2020
Publié: 27 mai 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
In part 1 I discussed the Habs vs pens series, and by the votes, the Pens have moved on from the qualifying round.
-
-
-
Oilers: Obviously the Oilers have two of the better player on the entire planet at the moment. However they construct their lines the Hawks are going to have to try and slow down McDavid and Draisaitl, I am just not sure if that is possible. Some other intriguing secondary options for the Oilers is the Nuge who had a fantastic season with real good two-way play, and also Kailer Yamamoto who could be a big wildcard here. After the top 6 it definitely falls off quite a bit and it is below average to average, nothing special

Hawks: Kane & Toews back in the playoffs. We know what could happen as these two always rise to the occasion. I feel like their forward group while lacking the firepower of the oilers, is a bit more well rounded in that aspect. Debrincat, Strome, and Kubalik are very solid players. The Hawks definitely have more depth at forward I would say.

Advantage Oilers: In a 5 game series, If McDavid and Draisaitl can continue to produce offence like they have, the Oilers still have the Hawks covered up front.

Defence:
Oilers: I would say their blue line is around league average. They don't have a stud blue liner but they have a couple decent players. The most intriguing is Ethan Bear, who I think could be their best defenceman already.

Hawks: Keith and Seabrook are now shells of their former selves, at this point they are liabilities rather than assets. Murphy and the rookie Boqvist are decent options.

advantage: Oilers. The main difference between the two blue lines is that Edmonton does not have any major anchors compared to the Hawks, so I give them the edge on the blue line.

Goalies:
Oilers: It is very unaware of who they are going to be going with in net here. Koskinen and Smith have similar stat lines. I would say this is probably their biggest weakness tandems from my experience don't really work in the playoffs, you have to find someone that is hot and run with them.

Hawks: Crawford while not putting up amazing base numbers, did really solid in high danger opportunities. He has experience and should be a nice calming presence for the Hawks.

advantage: this is the one area that I think the Hawks definitely have over the Oilers.

My consensus: Oilers in 5. I think this is going to be closer than a lot of people expect. The hawks have pretty decent depth at forward, which I think helps cover up a bit for the lack of firepower compared to the Oilers. As well as I still think Crawford is good enough to steal a game or two. At the end of the day however, the hawks defense is below average and I expect McDavid and Draisaitl to have a field day picking them apart every game.

Listed below are my players to watch for this series.

I will give everyone two hours to vote, and the winner in the comments will move on!
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1499 999 999 $57 699 999 $0 $6 207 500 $42 300 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance230 000 $$230K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
720 000 $720 000 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 750 000 $$2M)
G
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 mai 2020 à 13 h 53
#1
nucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 342
Mentions "j'aime": 126
mcdavid took some that stuff that kuznetsov brought over and they win in 3
bunzy1034 et BuFfaLOFaN a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2020 à 13 h 54
#2
Connor
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2018
Messages: 1,529
Mentions "j'aime": 635
Oilers, but I disagree with saying Bear might be their best dman already, he's a good passer, but probably average or even below average defensively, So I would say Klefbom is still their best dman.
bunzy1034 et BuFfaLOFaN a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2020 à 13 h 55
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,506
Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
I think this will be the closest of the 2 5-12 Wild Card Matchups... I think that the Hawks will take them in 5 with Kane and Teows stepping up.
bunzy1034 a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2020 à 13 h 58
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 5,597
Mentions "j'aime": 5,690
I got hawks in 5. Think you underrated the hawks defense a little bit. Seabrook barely plays anymore and the hawks are getting De Haan back who was out most the season. Crawford will be the deciding factor.
bunzy1034 et BuFfaLOFaN a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2020 à 13 h 59
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,571
Mentions "j'aime": 5,453
EDM
bunzy1034 et CD282 a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2020 à 14 h 1
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,506
Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
Quoting: SociallyHawkward
I got hawks in 5. Think you underrated the hawks defense a little bit. Seabrook barely plays anymore and the hawks are getting De Haan back who was out most the season. Crawford will be the deciding factor.


Cheers
SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2020 à 14 h 4
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 830
Mentions "j'aime": 716
I’ll vote for the hawks. If they win, the hockey world gets set on fire and I’m all for that.
27 mai 2020 à 14 h 36
#8
Kafle
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 2,467
Mentions "j'aime": 483
just the special teams will crush the hawks
CD282 et bunzy1034 a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2020 à 15 h 17
#9
Dubas isnt a genius
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 2,824
Mentions "j'aime": 681
Quoting: hockeyconnor97
Oilers, but I disagree with saying Bear might be their best dman already, he's a good passer, but probably average or even below average defensively, So I would say Klefbom is still their best dman.


His advanced stats are also lackluster. Nurse and Klefbom are both considerably better, and Larrsson is better on a good night.

Still EDM wins
hockeyconnor97 a aimé ceci.
27 mai 2020 à 15 h 28
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,499
Mentions "j'aime": 4,566
Its an interesting one. Chicago is 2-1-0 in the season series with a +1 goal differential, but EDM has a better GF/GP and GA/GP while also having a better PP% and PK%. EDM also wins the Hit/60, Blk/60 and TkA/60, with CHI winning GvA/60. I'll give CHI a little bit for being more battle tested in the Playoffs, but I think I have to give the edge to Edmonton.
bunzy1034 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage