SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

bruins interesting

Créé par: Ryancnbb
Équipe: 2020-21 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 13 mai 2020
Publié: 27 mai 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
24 000 000 $
32 500 000 $
21 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
77 250 000 $
11 000 000 $
16 250 000 $
11 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
ANA
  1. Moore, John
Détails additionnels:
anywhere for a 5th or smth
2.
BOS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (CGY)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de CGY
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $82 205 889 $964 222 $1 250 000 $-705 889 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 250 000 $$1M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 mai 2020 à 7 h 5
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,496
Mentions "j'aime": 4,562
It is interesting, but idk that Dadonov does a 1yr deal.
27 mai 2020 à 7 h 34
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,565
Mentions "j'aime": 5,450
Quoting: ON3M4N
It is interesting, but idk that Dadonov does a 1yr deal.


No way he does that

and can delete the Clifford signing, he isn't needed

Just hope for less term for Krug so less $, take some money off DeBrusk and give it to Grzelcyk . Sign free agents forwards for Providence, not Boston, there are 4-5 guys that will battle for spots and will save $.
27 mai 2020 à 8 h 30
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,496
Mentions "j'aime": 4,562
Quoting: bhavikp27
No way he does that

and can delete the Clifford signing, he isn't needed

Just hope for less term for Krug so less $, take some money off DeBrusk and give it to Grzelcyk . Sign free agents forwards for Providence, not Boston, there are 4-5 guys that will battle for spots and will save $.


I don't hate the Clifford signing, but you could get someone like Frederic to play a similar role.

On Krug, I'm wonder if we see something like a 4yr deal. I know the norm/default is to say this is when they get the 7/8 year deal, but even on a 4yr deal Krug is 32yr old when it expires. Being an OFD and PP threat means he should still be effective for another 3-4 years and at that point the cap will be significantly higher than it is now. IDK maybe something like 4yr/$6.5 per year is what I'm thinking if its not a long term deal. I know there will be many comments along the lines of "Krug will sign for 7 or 8" or "Krug will get more on the open market" and they maybe right. Just an alternative thought, where Krug is still making good money on a cup contender and could return home after 4 years (at which point DET should be contenders).
27 mai 2020 à 10 h 1
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Good RFA Deals!
Good chara deal, maybe a bit much for Krug, who knows if dadonov signs a 1 year deal but cool idea.
But they do not need to sign Clifford, Studnicka will be ready to play NHL hockey and they have both Blidh and Lindholm
The Moore trade is good, but they just traded hienen for ritchie, they arent giving him up for less than a 2nd

Overall: Not bad, but needs a few corrections
27 mai 2020 à 20 h 18
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,723
Mentions "j'aime": 535
Quoting: ON3M4N
I don't hate the Clifford signing, but you could get someone like Frederic to play a similar role.

On Krug, I'm wonder if we see something like a 4yr deal. I know the norm/default is to say this is when they get the 7/8 year deal, but even on a 4yr deal Krug is 32yr old when it expires. Being an OFD and PP threat means he should still be effective for another 3-4 years and at that point the cap will be significantly higher than it is now. IDK maybe something like 4yr/$6.5 per year is what I'm thinking if its not a long term deal. I know there will be many comments along the lines of "Krug will sign for 7 or 8" or "Krug will get more on the open market" and they maybe right. Just an alternative thought, where Krug is still making good money on a cup contender and could return home after 4 years (at which point DET should be contenders).


Isn't it if the term goes down the $ goes up. For example if krug signed for 4yrs wouldn't he want to demand closer to 7-8 mil as opposed to signing at 7-8yrs and demanding 6-7 mil, like the oshie deal
27 mai 2020 à 21 h 9
#6
GM CRIME DAWG
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 4,926
Mentions "j'aime": 2,687
Quoting: ON3M4N
I don't hate the Clifford signing, but you could get someone like Frederic to play a similar role.

On Krug, I'm wonder if we see something like a 4yr deal. I know the norm/default is to say this is when they get the 7/8 year deal, but even on a 4yr deal Krug is 32yr old when it expires. Being an OFD and PP threat means he should still be effective for another 3-4 years and at that point the cap will be significantly higher than it is now. IDK maybe something like 4yr/$6.5 per year is what I'm thinking if its not a long term deal. I know there will be many comments along the lines of "Krug will sign for 7 or 8" or "Krug will get more on the open market" and they maybe right. Just an alternative thought, where Krug is still making good money on a cup contender and could return home after 4 years (at which point DET should be contenders).


I think in theory that makes a ton of sense. Agent's however, likely try to maximize as much as possible. Unless their client is adamant they want something else?

Quoting: KennyBoi
Isn't it if the term goes down the $ goes up. For example if krug signed for 4yrs wouldn't he want to demand closer to 7-8 mil as opposed to signing at 7-8yrs and demanding 6-7 mil, like the oshie deal


Agree KB. Or Krug has a total US$ number in mind for him to sign off on (i.e.: $40, 45, XXMil etc.) and then the term can be negotiated/worked out from there?
27 mai 2020 à 21 h 35
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,496
Mentions "j'aime": 4,562
Quoting: McGruff
I think in theory that makes a ton of sense. Agent's however, likely try to maximize as much as possible. Unless their client is adamant they want something else?



Agree KB. Or Krug has a total US$ number in mind for him to sign off on (i.e.: $40, 45, XXMil etc.) and then the term can be negotiated/worked out from there?


In this case (as generic as it sounds) Krug's desire to stay in Boston and win a cup could be the thing he's adament that he wants. The team is very close with a serious contender window of 2-3 years. I still think they'll be good after that but a lot hinges on guys like Studnicka, Coyle, DeBrusk etc..
27 mai 2020 à 21 h 49
#8
GM CRIME DAWG
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 4,926
Mentions "j'aime": 2,687
Quoting: ON3M4N
In this case (as generic as it sounds) Krug's desire to stay in Boston and win a cup could be the thing he's adament that he wants. The team is very close with a serious contender window of 2-3 years. I still think they'll be good after that but a lot hinges on guys like Studnicka, Coyle, DeBrusk etc..


Yeah, saw an article/interview or two where he mentioned his desire for taking a hometown haircut.

Two things - think his agent may have been a little peeved w/ that (I have no idea really), and
DS still has time before he MUST sign him. So I think it's just that - wait for now because tomorrow could be another chapter that is the 2020-s*it show...the year that just keeps on giving!
27 mai 2020 à 22 h 1
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,496
Mentions "j'aime": 4,562
Quoting: McGruff
Yeah, saw an article/interview or two where he mentioned his desire for taking a hometown haircut.

Two things - think his agent may have been a little peeved w/ that (I have no idea really), and
DS still has time before he MUST sign him. So I think it's just that - wait for now because tomorrow could be another chapter that is the 2020-s*it show...the year that just keeps on giving!


I imagine the shutdown and flat cap also threw a wrinkle in talks between the two sides
McGruff a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage