SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

some rakell proposals

Créé par: Wqrrior
Équipe: 2020-21 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 24 mai 2020
Publié: 24 mai 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Rakell has not lived up to his full potential and seems best suited as a 2nd liner averaging about 50 points. What boosts his value is mostly his contract as he himself belongs to a fairly obtainable playertype. The ducks should part with him now, while he has two years on this contract to get the most value out of him. Once he demands a pay raise, his value will drop significantly.
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Timmins, Conor
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (COL)
2.
ANA
  1. Bjugstad, Nick
  2. Hållander, Filip
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
PIT
    Rakell
    3.
    NYI
    1. Mahura, Josh
    Détails additionnels:
    Rakell
    4.
    ANA
    1. Weegar, MacKenzie [Droits de RFA]
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (FLA)
    FLA
      Rakell
      5.
      ANA
      1. Domi, Max [Droits de RFA]
      MTL
        Rakell
        Rachats de contrats
        Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
        2020
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de BOS
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de NSH
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        2021
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de FLA
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de COL
        Logo de PIT
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        2022
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de ANA
        Logo de NSH
        Logo de ANA
        TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
        2281 500 000 $72 372 361 $0 $365 000 $9 127 639 $
        Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        863 333 $863 333 $
        AG, AD
        RFA - 1
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
        C
        NMC
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
        AD, AG
        M-NTC
        UFA - 4
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
        C, AD
        NMC
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
        AG, AD
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
        AG, C
        M-NTC
        UFA - 4
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
        C, AD
        M-NTC
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Islanders de New York
        5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
        AD, AG, C
        UFA - 4
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
        AG, AD
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
        C, AD
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        863 333 $863 333 $
        C, AG
        RFA - 1
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        700 000 $700 000 $
        C, AG
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
        764 167 $764 167 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
        C
        RFA - 3
        Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
        2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
        C, AD
        UFA - 1
        Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
        DG/DD
        M-NTC
        UFA - 6
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
        DD
        M-NTC
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
        G
        UFA - 7
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
        DG
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
        DD
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
        1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
        DG
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
        925 000 $925 000 $
        DD
        RFA - 1
        Logo de Islanders de New York
        764 167 $764 167 $ (Bonis de performance182 500 $$182K)
        DD
        UFA - 3

        Code d'intégration

        • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
        • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

        Texte intégré

        Cliquer pour surligner
        24 mai 2020 à 15 h 38
        #1
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: août 2017
        Messages: 8,440
        Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
        Avs say yes
        24 mai 2020 à 15 h 38
        #2
        Banni
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: sept. 2019
        Messages: 5,011
        Mentions "j'aime": 1,636
        As a Pens fan, I do that in a heartbeat.
        24 mai 2020 à 15 h 39
        #3
        v5 CBJ GM
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: févr. 2019
        Messages: 15,878
        Mentions "j'aime": 8,555
        Domi for Rakell? Oh yes please!
        24 mai 2020 à 15 h 39
        #4
        CHI NYI
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: mai 2018
        Messages: 4,661
        Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
        I think the Islanders do that, they get a better player for cheaper
        24 mai 2020 à 15 h 41
        #5
        Démarrer sujet
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: févr. 2019
        Messages: 10,304
        Mentions "j'aime": 3,986
        I'm waiting for Ducks fans to say that I'm short selling. But Rakell is more in name than he is of skill. He's only broken 50 points twice and holds one very good year. Otherwise he is for the most part someone people think performs better than he actually does.


        I will take criticism on how to balance any of these trades if they really do need it though,
        24 mai 2020 à 15 h 59
        #6
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2018
        Messages: 7,261
        Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
        Maybe
        Hard no
        Hard no
        YES!
        Probably
        24 mai 2020 à 16 h 10
        #7
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: janv. 2020
        Messages: 6,712
        Mentions "j'aime": 5,221
        I think there is too much coming back in the Florida trade.
        24 mai 2020 à 16 h 19
        #8
        Jah1722
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: janv. 2018
        Messages: 5,414
        Mentions "j'aime": 2,894
        Quoting: Wqrrior
        I'm waiting for Ducks fans to say that I'm short selling. But Rakell is more in name than he is of skill. He's only broken 50 points twice and holds one very good year. Otherwise he is for the most part someone people think performs better than he actually does.


        I will take criticism on how to balance any of these trades if they really do need it though,


        He just needs his shooting % to get back above 10-11%. He was still the ducks most dangerous player this season. He just lacked shooting %. The argument there is were those two 30 goals season aberrations because of an elevated shooting % or can he get back to that shooting %.
        24 mai 2020 à 16 h 19
        #9
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: août 2016
        Messages: 377
        Mentions "j'aime": 26
        don't think they would trade before they know ducks are out of playoffs(20-21). at that time rakell value possiby at his best.
        24 mai 2020 à 16 h 21
        #10
        What in tarnation
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: oct. 2017
        Messages: 32,709
        Mentions "j'aime": 31,449
        Imo PIT trade is underwhelming. Bjugstad has no value whatsoever, low 2nd in a weak draft isn't that enticing and Hållander...well he's good but not something that ANA needs.
        MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
        24 mai 2020 à 16 h 55
        #11
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: nov. 2018
        Messages: 5,137
        Mentions "j'aime": 5,936
        The only trades here the. Ducks think about for more than 5 seconds is the FLA and COL trade the rest are brutal, Bailey and Wilde don’t get just Rakell let alone him and Mahura. PIT trade is things the Ducks don’t need and doesn’t make sense. Do I for Rakell doesn’t make sense for the Ducks either
        24 mai 2020 à 17 h 2
        #12
        Démarrer sujet
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: févr. 2019
        Messages: 10,304
        Mentions "j'aime": 3,986
        Quoting: Salzy
        The only trades here the. Ducks think about for more than 5 seconds is the FLA and COL trade the rest are brutal, Bailey and Wilde don’t get just Rakell let alone him and Mahura. PIT trade is things the Ducks don’t need and doesn’t make sense. Do I for Rakell doesn’t make sense for the Ducks either


        Bailey's stats are practically identical to Rakell's and you get him for longer. Wilde is practically exactly the prospect you need. I actually thought that was the higher end of value in these offers. I understand the team might want to get younger, however this trade makes them better. Bailey is on par with Rakell in most every category other than age and contract. I'd change Mahura to Larsson though.
        24 mai 2020 à 17 h 6
        #13
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: nov. 2018
        Messages: 5,137
        Mentions "j'aime": 5,936
        Quoting: Wqrrior
        Bailey's stats are practically identical to Rakell's and you get him for longer. Wilde is practically exactly the prospect you need. I actually thought that was the higher end of value in these offers. I understand the team might want to get younger, however this trade makes them better. Bailey is on par with Rakell in most every category other than age and contract. I'd change Mahura to Larsson though.


        He doesn’t fit with the Ducks compete window the only reason to move Rakell would be to get younger

        Yeah Wilde would be good but Rakell get more than Wilde and Bailey isn’t the more the ducks would want or need. Even with Larsson over Mahura the ducks don’t do that trade Bailey isn’t a player the ducks would be adding in a Rakell trade, they’d be better off keeping him if that’s all they get back
        24 mai 2020 à 17 h 24
        #14
        John 3 16
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: avr. 2020
        Messages: 9,581
        Mentions "j'aime": 4,618
        Avs say yes. You could probably get a 1st instead of a 2nd with Timmins. Though I would only trade Timmins if we had another solution at RHD (eg. Pietrangelo).

        Florida wouldn't give up Weegar and a 1st. Weegar is their 1 LHD this season paired with Ekblad (on his off -side)
         
        Répondre
        To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
        Question:
        Options:
        Ajouter une option
        Soumettre le sondage