SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Hard moves

Créé par: TheChief
Équipe: 2020-21 Stars de Dallas
Date de création initiale: 23 mai 2020
Publié: 23 mai 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
65 000 000 $
33 333 333 $
32 750 000 $
1750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
32 650 000 $
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
Transactions
1.
DAL
  1. Burns, Brent (1 200 000 $ retained)
2.
3.
DAL
  1. Strome, Ryan [Droits de RFA]
NYR
  1. Faksa, Radek [Droits de RFA]
  2. Oleksiak, Jamie
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (DAL)
Détails additionnels:
Someone posted a trade like this, don't recall who it was but credit to them.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de BUF
2021
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
2022
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $77 923 564 $3 047 866 $3 437 500 $3 576 436 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
9 850 000 $9 850 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Stars de Dallas
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
AD
RFA - 3
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Stars de Dallas
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 080 000 $4 080 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Stars de Dallas
4 916 667 $4 916 667 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
700 000 $700 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Stars de Dallas
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
737 500 $737 500 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 mai 2020 à 10 h 38
#1
G O S I M E K
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 930
Mentions "j'aime": 368
SJ declines. Burns has way more value than Pavs now and we don’t want Cogliano. With salary retained we could get a better deal for Burns elsewhere.
23 mai 2020 à 10 h 39
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 881
Mentions "j'aime": 262
Quoting: Lord_Simek
SJ declines. Burns has way more value than Pavs now and we don’t want Cogliano. With salary retained we could get a better deal for Burns elsewhere.


2 years of decent Pavelski ws 5 years of declining Burns...if I were SJ I'd do this quickly.
23 mai 2020 à 10 h 41
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 2,918
Mentions "j'aime": 1,489
Question is why trade Faksa+ for a guy to be paid 5M on the 3rd line?
23 mai 2020 à 10 h 42
#4
G O S I M E K
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 930
Mentions "j'aime": 368
Quoting: TheChief
2 years of decent Pavelski ws 5 years of declining Burns...if I were SJ I'd do this quickly.


Declining Burns is still good for 55-60 points from the blue line. He’s still putting up big minutes and he really hasn’t shown any sign of declining. He is aging very well as he is very fit.
23 mai 2020 à 10 h 43
#5
Dubas isnt a genius
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 2,824
Mentions "j'aime": 681
Toronto declines. We take out Liljegren and you take out Comeau and we accept. If that's not enough take SDA. He's worth like a 2nd. And Bracco if you want I know everyone laughs at him but he is 1 year removed from a over a ppg season in the A. Worth a 4th/5th.
23 mai 2020 à 10 h 43
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,130
Mentions "j'aime": 14,142
Quoting: Lord_Simek
SJ declines. Burns has way more value than Pavs now and we don’t want Cogliano. With salary retained we could get a better deal for Burns elsewhere.


Getting out of burns contract should be a priority
23 mai 2020 à 10 h 45
#7
G O S I M E K
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 930
Mentions "j'aime": 368
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Getting out of burns contract should be a priority


Getting out of Jones and Vlasic deals is a priority. No need to move someone like Burns who isn’t really declining and still holds strong value.
23 mai 2020 à 10 h 58
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Burns is not a dump. You would need to add your very best prospect probably
23 mai 2020 à 13 h 50
#9
McFaksaGOAT
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,234
Mentions "j'aime": 856
Quoting: firezfurx
Toronto declines. We take out Liljegren and you take out Comeau and we accept. If that's not enough take SDA. He's worth like a 2nd. And Bracco if you want I know everyone laughs at him but he is 1 year removed from a over a ppg season in the A. Worth a 4th/5th.


Bruh lmao Dallas doesn’t take that current offer. They’re not moving Klingberg for Nylander, it would be for Marner/Tavares and yeah Dallas would add a little bit but they’d only move Klingberg for a big piece
23 mai 2020 à 14 h 9
#10
Dubas isnt a genius
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 2,824
Mentions "j'aime": 681
Quoting: McFaksaGOAT
Bruh lmao Dallas doesn’t take that current offer. They’re not moving Klingberg for Nylander, it would be for Marner/Tavares and yeah Dallas would add a little bit but they’d only move Klingberg for a big piece


That's funny. As is Nylander has slightly more value then Klingberg. Nylander+3rd= Klingerg+Robertson.

Nylander is a big piece, 37 goal pace 70 pt pace playing on the 2nd line.

He would've been your top goal scorer by 11 GOALS and your highest point producer by 9 points. He performed considerably better then Seguin, Benn, etc. People forget how good he is.
23 mai 2020 à 16 h 9
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 881
Mentions "j'aime": 262
Quoting: Bluetomorrow83
Question is why trade Faksa+ for a guy to be paid 5M on the 3rd line?


He plays there since he fits there best. He could play up if there's injuries.
23 mai 2020 à 16 h 14
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 881
Mentions "j'aime": 262
Quoting: firezfurx
Toronto declines. We take out Liljegren and you take out Comeau and we accept. If that's not enough take SDA. He's worth like a 2nd. And Bracco if you want I know everyone laughs at him but he is 1 year removed from a over a ppg season in the A. Worth a 4th/5th.


Quoting: firezfurx
That's funny. As is Nylander has slightly more value then Klingberg. Nylander+3rd= Klingerg+Robertson.

Nylander is a big piece, 37 goal pace 70 pt pace playing on the 2nd line.

He would've been your top goal scorer by 11 GOALS and your highest point producer by 9 points. He performed considerably better then Seguin, Benn, etc. People forget how good he is.


Nylander and Klingberg are equal in my opinion. Dropping Liljegren and Comeau is absolutely ridiculous idea considering how good Robertson is.

Klingberg+Robertson = Nylander+3rd is the stupidest thing I've heard for a while now.

DAL is low scoring team so it's not exactly a surprise that Nylander would outscore players from the team. Tyler f***ing Ennis would be the 2nd highest scorer behind Seguin in this team.
McFaksaGOAT et C_M_O_R a aimé ceci.
23 mai 2020 à 16 h 15
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 881
Mentions "j'aime": 262
Quoting: papishark
Burns is not a dump. You would need to add your very best prospect probably


Lmaoooo
23 mai 2020 à 16 h 16
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 881
Mentions "j'aime": 262
Quoting: Lord_Simek
Getting out of Jones and Vlasic deals is a priority. No need to move someone like Burns who isn’t really declining and still holds strong value.


No one is taking them. Better sell of a player with somewhat positive value before your team slumps completely. There's no saving SJ anymore.
23 mai 2020 à 16 h 16
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 881
Mentions "j'aime": 262
Quoting: McFaksaGOAT
Bruh lmao Dallas doesn’t take that current offer. They’re not moving Klingberg for Nylander, it would be for Marner/Tavares and yeah Dallas would add a little bit but they’d only move Klingberg for a big piece


Tone down a bit. Klingberg ain't that good.
23 mai 2020 à 16 h 30
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: TheChief
Lmaoooo


If you want us to take two mad overpaid guys back yes. Or you can make a resonable offer
23 mai 2020 à 16 h 36
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 881
Mentions "j'aime": 262
Quoting: papishark
If you want us to take two mad overpaid guys back yes. Or you can make a resonable offer


Tad overpaid but much shorter contracts.

Might as well leave you with one more crippling contract.
23 mai 2020 à 16 h 43
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: TheChief
Tad overpaid but much shorter contracts.

Might as well leave you with one more crippling contract.


Ok sounds good. You clearly dont know Burns at all
23 mai 2020 à 21 h 28
#19
McFaksaGOAT
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,234
Mentions "j'aime": 856
Quoting: firezfurx
That's funny. As is Nylander has slightly more value then Klingberg. Nylander+3rd= Klingerg+Robertson.

Nylander is a big piece, 37 goal pace 70 pt pace playing on the 2nd line.

He would've been your top goal scorer by 11 GOALS and your highest point producer by 9 points. He performed considerably better then Seguin, Benn, etc. People forget how good he is.


My dude Nylander does not have more value 😭 Klingberg is a legit number 1 offensive dman. One down year in a garbage system doesn’t make him bad
C_M_O_R a aimé ceci.
23 mai 2020 à 21 h 28
#20
McFaksaGOAT
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 2,234
Mentions "j'aime": 856
Quoting: TheChief
Tone down a bit. Klingberg ain't that good.


And why’s that? He’s a legit number one offensive dman. Because he had one down year in a system that relies 0 on offense makes him bad? Don’t give me that crap man that’s a load of bs and you know it
24 mai 2020 à 4 h 36
#21
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 881
Mentions "j'aime": 262
Quoting: McFaksaGOAT
And why’s that? He’s a legit number one offensive dman. Because he had one down year in a system that relies 0 on offense makes him bad? Don’t give me that crap man that’s a load of bs and you know it


He has two years left. He's defensively miserable and need to count in Lindell way too much to be called a legit no. 1 D. First pair D sure, but not a leading D necessarily.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage