SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2020 - 21 team

Créé par: gregory_papas
Équipe: 2020-21 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 21 mai 2020
Publié: 21 mai 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
55 250 000 $
15 150 000 $
1750 000 $
21 500 000 $
1925 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
43 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
DET
  1. Hájek, Libor
  2. Smith, Brendan (1 350 000 $ retained)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (BUF)
2.
NYR
  1. Borgström, Henrik [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (FLA)
Détails additionnels:
top 10 protected
3.
NYR
  1. Barratt, Evan
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
CHI
  1. Georgiev, Alexandar [Droits de RFA]
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de NYR
Logo de CAR
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
2021
Logo de NYR
Logo de FLA
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $72 663 133 $0 $7 212 500 $8 836 867 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 150 000 $5 150 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 2
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 700 000 $5 700 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Rangers de New York
730 000 $730 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 mai 2020 à 17 h 10
#1
Go Sharks Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 1,583
Mentions "j'aime": 656
Not a fan of either teams, but I would think Buchnevich has more value
21 mai 2020 à 17 h 24
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 851
Mentions "j'aime": 139
Quoting: JumboJoe
Not a fan of either teams, but I would think Buchnevich has more value


what kind of return?
21 mai 2020 à 17 h 25
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 21,480
Mentions "j'aime": 11,898
Detroit got rid of Brendon Smith for a reason and he won't ever play for Detroit again.
21 mai 2020 à 17 h 34
#4
Go Sharks Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 1,583
Mentions "j'aime": 656
Quoting: gregory_papas
what kind of return?


From San Jose's point of view I would give a 2021 1st with no protection, Labanc, Chekovich, and Colorado's 2020 2nd. Not too much more, but San Jose isn't really in the position to go after another big name guy in a trade.
21 mai 2020 à 17 h 40
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 851
Mentions "j'aime": 139
Quoting: aedoran
Detroit got rid of Brendon Smith for a reason and he won't ever play for Detroit again.


i know your point of view on this already. you don't have to keep reiterating your narrative. teams trade for players they traded in the past, been happening for decades. the wings also didn't get rid of smith because they didn't want him. he was traded at the deadline because they knew they couldn't afford him and they weren't a playoff team. smith is a player that can play both sides on d and forward. they can retain salary and trade him again at the dl.
21 mai 2020 à 17 h 42
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 851
Mentions "j'aime": 139
Quoting: JumboJoe
From San Jose's point of view I would give a 2021 1st with no protection, Labanc, Chekovich, and Colorado's 2020 2nd. Not too much more, but San Jose isn't really in the position to go after another big name guy in a trade.


that's a lot to give up for a middle 6 forward. the rangers would happily take your offer though. i'm not a fan of labanc but since you're giving him away for cheap i'd take him.
21 mai 2020 à 18 h 5
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 21,480
Mentions "j'aime": 11,898
Quoting: gregory_papas
i know your point of view on this already. you don't have to keep reiterating your narrative. teams trade for players they traded in the past, been happening for decades. the wings also didn't get rid of smith because they didn't want him. he was traded at the deadline because they knew they couldn't afford him and they weren't a playoff team. smith is a player that can play both sides on d and forward. they can retain salary and trade him again at the dl.


They traded him because he pissed off a couple in the front office.
mikearky a aimé ceci.
21 mai 2020 à 21 h 46
#8
arky
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 6,674
Mentions "j'aime": 4,315
Quoting: gregory_papas
i know your point of view on this already. you don't have to keep reiterating your narrative. teams trade for players they traded in the past, been happening for decades. the wings also didn't get rid of smith because they didn't want him. he was traded at the deadline because they knew they couldn't afford him and they weren't a playoff team. smith is a player that can play both sides on d and forward. they can retain salary and trade him again at the dl.


He was traded because he wanted more than he was worth. He wanted more than Holland thought he was worth and he was dealt to Rangers and signed to a deal he wanted. Looks like Holland was correct and Yzerman is not going to take back Smith as he knows what he is and does not want players who are not trying.
22 mai 2020 à 0 h 56
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 851
Mentions "j'aime": 139
Quoting: mikearky
He was traded because he wanted more than he was worth. He wanted more than Holland thought he was worth and he was dealt to Rangers and signed to a deal he wanted. Looks like Holland was correct and Yzerman is not going to take back Smith as he knows what he is and does not want players who are not trying.


mike, you're looking at this trade wrong. if the wings don't want smith they can put him in the minors or buy him out. smith isn't the value of the trade. he is there for salary cap reasons. in the trade the wings are getting a young LD who is nhl ready that could be a solid 3rd line D and a 3rd for Nemeth.

who gives a **** about smith, bro. the wings are taking 3 mill of his cap hit. smith also isn't useless of a player. he isn't good but look at your team. he'll also have value at the trade deadline for the wings.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage