Quoting: F50marco
Who said anything about when they were drafted? Mack was a beast in first season. He had a few down years but that was him underachieving. Not sure you can compare Macks 38 point second season to Thomas's 42 point second season and say "see they're both elite". One guy was elite from the get go and underachieved. The other wasn't touted as elite and in overachieving. There is a huge difference there IMO. You are free to think otherwise.
As for getting an elite center, I kind of need to redact that as even I had to rethink what I said. What I actually mean is *close to an elite center. I had rephrased it in my last comment to you. Its says "should be able to net a very high end player whose on the verge of elite as is"
For context, STL got ROR for Thompson, Berglund, Sobotka a protected 1st and a 2nd rounder. We're talking about the 11th pick, possibly higher, in one of the draft people are proclaiming is on of the best in years, a certified top 4 dman whose in his prime and has the ability to be a game breaker and cheap cost controlled back up goalie (whatever, Stalock isn't the important part of this deal here).
Yeah I think it should land you a ROR easily but yeah, definitely not a Mackinnon or Draisaitl etc. I misspoke about that.
Edit: Boy oh boy, spelling mistakes galore. I've proof read this post again and corrected some things in case you wondering what the heck I was trying to convey. lol
Of course I don't mean MacKinnon and Thomas are the same, I'm just saying becoming "Elite" isn't always a completely linear path, and just because Thomas hasn't produced at an elite pace in the NHL (in only his second season) doesn't mean that they won't ever be there. But, honestly, we're getting hung up on production here and I don't necessarily see that as the only hallmark of being elite. I don't ever really see Thomas as a dynamic scorer, he's always been more of a playmaker and always been solid defensively. I think he could very easily become a Couturier/Bergeron type, and I think both of those guys are elite.
Which, at that point, maybe this comes down to semantics over what you consider "elite", because maybe Couturier/Bergeron don't make your elite list. Draisaitl is an elite goal scorer, indisputably, but is abysmal in his own end. Does that mean he isn't truly elite? A lot of people, including me, would still say he is, despite his defensive play. I think Couturier and Bergeron (both of who score 20+ every year so it's not like they're bums), who are primarily elite defensive forwards but don't have quite the offensive upside are also elite, but that isn't quite as universally agreed upon, especially with Couturier. But it's tough, because you can either be really exclusive with the "elite" tier and just have guys like McDavid, Crosby, maybe even Matthews who are just good at everything but once you start opening it up to the Draisaitl's and Petterson's of the league who are a bit more one-dimensional on the offensive side I think you gotta give the defensive minded guys elite credit too.
I am seeing your "close to elite" statement now, must have glossed over that. I would generally agree that that package could get you a higher end, Logan Couture or Tyler Seguin-type (discounting contracts and whether those teams would actually trade them), but it bares mentioning that Buffalo handled the O'Reilly trade very very poorly and should have gotten much more for him. That trade swirled in the ethos quite a bit before it happened and most of the mock trades were demanding Thomas, a first, and a good forward. The only thing they got out of there was the first, considering the Blues were trying to dump Berglund and Sobotka anyway.
Ha, you're all good. Believe me, I'll never be a guy to make a fuss over spelling.