SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Playoff lines for the 12 seed

Créé par: bluedemon5
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 14 mai 2020
Publié: 18 mai 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $60 120 019 $0 $7 797 500 $21 379 981 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
880 833 $880 833 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 mai 2020 à 21 h 39
#1
Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,598
Hawks gonna win the Stanley Cup. Dach is gonna be Conn Smythe winner.
DarthKane a aimé ceci.
18 mai 2020 à 21 h 49
#2
DarthKane
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 826
Mentions "j'aime": 130
Quoting: Jco5ta5
Hawks gonna win the Stanley Cup. Dach is gonna be Conn Smythe winner.


I like the cut of your jib!
Jco5ta5 a aimé ceci.
18 mai 2020 à 22 h 24
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Can we please keep cat, strome, and Kane together? JC is seriously an idiot since he separated that line. Kane gets the absolute best out of both cat and strome. No one else on the team is capable of Kane’s creativity and ability to involve teammates.
18 mai 2020 à 22 h 44
#4
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,157
Mentions "j'aime": 23,514
I think they can call up AHL guys no?

Kubalik-Toews-Nylander
Debrincat-Strome-Kane
Smith-Dach-Saad
Kurashev-Kampf-Carpenter
SlickWilly a aimé ceci.
18 mai 2020 à 22 h 58
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,188
Mentions "j'aime": 2,123
Quoting: csick
I think they can call up AHL guys no?

Kubalik-Toews-Nylander
Debrincat-Strome-Kane
Smith-Dach-Saad
Kurashev-Kampf-Carpenter


I hope they call up Kurashev and give Hagel some minutes, but Nylander-Strome-Kane was a line that was doing well right before the season cut out so Id probably go
Kubalik-Toews-Saad
Nylander-Strome-Kane
Dcat-Dach-Kurashev
Caggiula-Kampf-Hagel
But I think Hagel and Kurashev could be interchanged with Smith and Carpenter if they are getting destroyed
csick a aimé ceci.
19 mai 2020 à 0 h 33
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
Quoting: HatterTParty
Can we please keep cat, strome, and Kane together? JC is seriously an idiot since he separated that line. Kane gets the absolute best out of both cat and strome. No one else on the team is capable of Kane’s creativity and ability to involve teammates.


Because as much as they scored they got scored on more; absolute defensive nightmare that line was.
19 mai 2020 à 0 h 35
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
Quoting: csick
I think they can call up AHL guys no?

Kubalik-Toews-Nylander
Debrincat-Strome-Kane
Smith-Dach-Saad
Kurashev-Kampf-Carpenter


Ugh, first line should be Kubalik, Toews, and Saad...that was the best line this season and that means playing 200ft of hockey not 100ft which is why the Cat - Strome - Kane line was a not successful...they scored a lot but got scored on more.
19 mai 2020 à 0 h 41
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: ChiHawk
Because as much as they scored they got scored on more; absolute defensive nightmare that line was.


But that’s why you have the other three lines. Each of the other three lines can be 200 footers. However, you need a line like cat-strome-Kane that can be full offense when other lines can’t be. That line was sick a year ago. I understand they give up goals, but give them all the ozone starts then.
19 mai 2020 à 0 h 49
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
Modifié 19 mai 2020 à 0 h 58
Quoting: HatterTParty
But that’s why you have the other three lines. Each of the other three lines can be 200 footers. However, you need a line like cat-strome-Kane that can be full offense when other lines can’t be. That line was sick a year ago. I understand they give up goals, but give them all the ozone starts then.


You can't win when that line puts up 2 goals per game but gets scored on 3 goals per game. Every line has to have at least one two way guy. Kane - Strome and Cat are not good enough to forgo offense. That might work with Matthews, Marner but even then they try to put a 3rd guy on the line that plays some defense.

Here's the stats on that line;
1.59 goals for per game
2.76 goals against per game

In other words....doesn't work.
19 mai 2020 à 1 h 2
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: ChiHawk
You can't win when that line puts up 2 goals per game but gets scored on 3 goals per game. Every line has to have at least one two way guy. Kane - Strome and Cat are not good enough to forgo offense. That might work with Matthews, Marner but even then they try to put a 3rd guy on the line that plays some defense.


I was gonna say, before you put the Matthews thing in, tons of teams go full offensive with certain lines. If cat-strome-Kane were allowed to run and gun, I’ll trust them. Especially if they can work their skill together, go for it.
19 mai 2020 à 1 h 8
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
Modifié 19 mai 2020 à 1 h 14
Quoting: HatterTParty
I was gonna say, before you put the Matthews thing in, tons of teams go full offensive with certain lines. If cat-strome-Kane were allowed to run and gun, I’ll trust them. Especially if they can work their skill together, go for it.


You must have missed my edit above...

Here's the stats on that line;
1.59 goals for per game
2.76 goals against per game

In other words....doesn't work. You also aren't dealing with speed demons so run and gun doesn't work; Kane and Cat are above average and Strome below average speed wise. Kane was faster in his day but has slowed down. Cat was never a speed demon but faster then average.

Compared to Matthews Hyman and Marner
3.06 goals for per game
2.42 goals against per game

Both lines don't play in front of great defenses but would argue the Hawks had a better defense in the front two pairings this season especially after the Leaf players injuries.
19 mai 2020 à 1 h 15
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: ChiHawk
You must have missed my edit above...

Here's the stats on that line;
1.59 goals for per game
2.76 goals against per game

In other words....doesn't work. You also aren't dealing with speed demons so run and gun doesn't work; Kane and Cat are above average and Strome below average speed wise. Kane was faster in his day but has slowed down. Cat was never a speed demon but faster then average.

Compared to Matthews Hyman and Marner
3.06 goals for per game
2.42 goals against per game


I get what you’re saying, I do, and the stats don’t lie. Here’s the problem: save for the top line, there isn’t a single line combination that has fit well together and consistently performed. Cat-strome-Kane did, but for the sake of stats, I’ll just say screw it. It still doesn’t change the fact that cat and strome are lost without Kane. They’ve honestly shown that all year. You said it yourself, chemistry is everything.
19 mai 2020 à 1 h 19
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
Quoting: HatterTParty
I get what you’re saying, I do, and the stats don’t lie. Here’s the problem: save for the top line, there isn’t a single line combination that has fit well together and consistently performed. Cat-strome-Kane did, but for the sake of stats, I’ll just say screw it. It still doesn’t change the fact that cat and strome are lost without Kane. They’ve honestly shown that all year. You said it yourself, chemistry is everything.


But Kane makes most players look good so thus begs the question, how good is Strome?

Cat - Strome - Shaw looked good IMO also.

I think you have to entertain the team moving Cat and Strome to the 3rd line and Dach and Kane on the 2nd. Take your pick on the wingers that can fill the void. I would love to see a line of Cat - Strome and Kapannen...that would be a good line. Then let's say we get luck and draft Holtz, Holtz - Dach - Kane?
19 mai 2020 à 2 h 0
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: ChiHawk
But Kane makes most players look good so thus begs the question, how good is Strome?

Cat - Strome - Shaw looked good IMO also.

I think you have to entertain the team moving Cat and Strome to the 3rd line and Dach and Kane on the 2nd. Take your pick on the wingers that can fill the void. I would love to see a line of Cat - Strome and Kapannen...that would be a good line. Then let's say we get luck and draft Holtz, Holtz - Dach - Kane?


I still just don’t trust golden boy offensively. You put cat and strome on the third line, that’s another line of poor defense. Pure and simple. They’re a liability in their own zone. However, they do work best together. Again, chemistry yes? If you know you want to keep them together and they’re always gonna be a liability, why not keep Kane with them? Kapanen isn’t gonna make them better defensively.

As for holtz, he should stay in Sweden another year. Once here, depending on what the team looks like, sure, put with our franchise savior. Holtz can shoot, that’s for sure.
19 mai 2020 à 2 h 14
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
Quoting: HatterTParty
I still just don’t trust golden boy offensively. You put cat and strome on the third line, that’s another line of poor defense. Pure and simple. They’re a liability in their own zone. However, they do work best together. Again, chemistry yes? If you know you want to keep them together and they’re always gonna be a liability, why not keep Kane with them? Kapanen isn’t gonna make them better defensively.

As for holtz, he should stay in Sweden another year. Once here, depending on what the team looks like, sure, put with our franchise savior. Holtz can shoot, that’s for sure.


Not if you have Cat- Strome and Kap who is pretty good defensively and furthermore, playing against the other teams 3rd liners they won't be as exposed. Dude, Kap is pretty decent defensively, it's not even remotely close to suggest Kane and Kap are similar defensively. Kap plays the PK for one.

Holtz - Dach - Kane
Cat - Strome - Kap

Way more balanced and collectively will outscore then get scored on versus the dreadful Cat - Strome - Kane line.

Holtz could use another year in the SHL and yes, playing him with Dach would make sense...Holtz can shoot, Kane is an elite passer and Dach is doing a fine job in front of the net like Toews did for Sharpy in past years.
19 mai 2020 à 2 h 35
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: ChiHawk
Not if you have Cat- Strome and Kap who is pretty good defensively and furthermore, playing against the other teams 3rd liners they won't be as exposed. Dude, Kap is pretty decent defensively, it's not even remotely close to suggest Kane and Kap are similar defensively. Kap plays the PK for one.

Holtz - Dach - Kane
Cat - Strome - Kap

Way more balanced and collectively will outscore then get scored on versus the dreadful Cat - Strome - Kane line.

Holtz could use another year in the SHL and yes, playing him with Dach would make sense...Holtz can shoot, Kane is an elite passer and Dach is doing a fine job in front of the net like Toews did for Sharpy in past years.


Believe me, I’m not suggesting Kap and Kane are comparable defensively. Kap is a good penalty killer for sure, but he alone does not compensate for cat and strome defensively.

Holtz is still one of the top 2-3 guys I want in the draft. Him, Raymond, or even Rossi are my favorites where were positioned in the draft. He’d be a great goal scorer to add to the core. If we got Raymond, not to be disrespectful to the rest of the team, he would instantly be the second best playmaker on the team behind Kane. Rossi, well, you know we got that debate going.
19 mai 2020 à 11 h 15
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
Quoting: HatterTParty
Believe me, I’m not suggesting Kap and Kane are comparable defensively. Kap is a good penalty killer for sure, but he alone does not compensate for cat and strome defensively.

Holtz is still one of the top 2-3 guys I want in the draft. Him, Raymond, or even Rossi are my favorites where were positioned in the draft. He’d be a great goal scorer to add to the core. If we got Raymond, not to be disrespectful to the rest of the team, he would instantly be the second best playmaker on the team behind Kane. Rossi, well, you know we got that debate going.


Well he does a lot better then Kane defensively and I think Kap's speed would open up that line and allow Cat more room.

Raymond would be incredible. I hope the lottery still happens as normally would. If the Hawks jumped up to the #3 pick, I think they have a tough choice between Raymond and Stutzle given that AF and Byfield go 1 and 2.
19 mai 2020 à 13 h 32
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: ChiHawk
Well he does a lot better then Kane defensively and I think Kap's speed would open up that line and allow Cat more room.

Raymond would be incredible. I hope the lottery still happens as normally would. If the Hawks jumped up to the #3 pick, I think they have a tough choice between Raymond and Stutzle given that AF and Byfield go 1 and 2.


If the lottery happens and the hawks get a top 3 pick again this year, I will probably lose my **** because someone out there genuinely wants bowman employed. I’m sick of not understanding what direction this team is going.

One thing I’ve been doing a really great job lately of not thinking about is the fact that even if our messiah is better (at least for now) than Hughes and kakko, that’s still not guaranteed with byram, turcotte, and so on. Even more importantly, the young messiah still needs to play in the central division until he either gets traded or retires. As it stands, the blues, avs, and stars are running rough shot. Then it’ll be the Avs almost exclusively. Beyond that (maybe 8-10 years from now), who knows. It’s nice everyone loves this kid in Chicago so far, but he ain’t gonna win ya the division, let alone the cup. However, on the off chance we get number 3, getting a number 1C like stutzle would definitely trend in the right direction. Still would drive me nuts cuz bowman would still be around and JC would keep the team in mediocrity.
19 mai 2020 à 14 h 5
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
Quoting: HatterTParty
If the lottery happens and the hawks get a top 3 pick again this year, I will probably lose my **** because someone out there genuinely wants bowman employed. I’m sick of not understanding what direction this team is going.

One thing I’ve been doing a really great job lately of not thinking about is the fact that even if our messiah is better (at least for now) than Hughes and kakko, that’s still not guaranteed with byram, turcotte, and so on. Even more importantly, the young messiah still needs to play in the central division until he either gets traded or retires. As it stands, the blues, avs, and stars are running rough shot. Then it’ll be the Avs almost exclusively. Beyond that (maybe 8-10 years from now), who knows. It’s nice everyone loves this kid in Chicago so far, but he ain’t gonna win ya the division, let alone the cup. However, on the off chance we get number 3, getting a number 1C like stutzle would definitely trend in the right direction. Still would drive me nuts cuz bowman would still be around and JC would keep the team in mediocrity.


As if Turcotte is going to win the division or the cup. Come on dude, not even Kane can win us a cup...it took Hossa, Toews, Keith, Seabs, Jammer, etc. Some of the statements you spit out from frustration or anger are so over the top buddy.

It takes a strong core to win a cup and while I think Dach has the upside to be a Toews, none of the other players are reminiscent of Hossa, Kane, or Keith although maybe can argue Boqvist will be close to Keith one day. That is the problem with this team, we don't have the depth of talent in our young guys (Buf, Keith, Seabs, Kane, Toews, Jammer, Shaw, etc.) that we did back in 2009 to add a world class vet (Hossa) and a very solid young A- player (Sharp) to win a cup. It's starts with the core young guys and Mitchell, Boqvist, Dach, Cat, Strome, Kubalik just don't stack up to those guys talent wise as the guys back then.

Now if we get a top 3 pick in the lottery this year, that really changes a lot IMO. Byfield, Stutzle and AF are unreal players and throw in Raymond. That top 4 is on another level in a very good draft year versus the next 6 players or so. Stutzle is more often then not projected as a LW at the NHL level. I'm all aboard if the #3 pick comes in it should be Stutzle, but Raymond looks darn good in his own right.
19 mai 2020 à 14 h 44
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: ChiHawk
As if Turcotte is going to win the division or the cup. Come on dude, not even Kane can win us a cup...it took Hossa, Toews, Keith, Seabs, Jammer, etc. Some of the statements you spit out from frustration or anger are so over the top buddy.

It takes a strong core to win a cup and while I think Dach has the upside to be a Toews, none of the other players are reminiscent of Hossa, Kane, or Keith although maybe can argue Boqvist will be close to Keith one day. That is the problem with this team, we don't have the depth of talent in our young guys (Buf, Keith, Seabs, Kane, Toews, Jammer, Shaw, etc.) that we did back in 2009 to add a world class vet (Hossa) and a very solid young A- player (Sharp) to win a cup. It's starts with the core young guys and Mitchell, Boqvist, Dach, Cat, Strome, Kubalik just don't stack up to those guys talent wise as the guys back then.

Now if we get a top 3 pick in the lottery this year, that really changes a lot IMO. Byfield, Stutzle and AF are unreal players and throw in Raymond. That top 4 is on another level in a very good draft year versus the next 6 players or so. Stutzle is more often then not projected as a LW at the NHL level. I'm all aboard if the #3 pick comes in it should be Stutzle, but Raymond looks darn good in his own right.


Believe me, I’m not saying turcotte wins a cup either. No way. I’m just talking individual performance when I brought him up.

As for the young core, I Agree it’s more unspectacular than previous years. Mitchell projects more like Duncan to me. With boqvist (sorry to bring this up), I just want a coach who will actually use him the right way. He’s never gonna be a defensive stand out, he just won’t. So use him in a positive way that promotes his offensive prowess. As for the rest of the core, as you said, it doesn’t seem to match the level 2009 had. Even if we did, coaching is a huge part of the process and JC is not an NHL coach.

Getting top 3 would obviously change that, but the odds of lightning striking two years straight is nil. I could also see the NHL scraping the lottery system this year. I’ve heard rumors on it anyway.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
19 mai 2020 à 18 h 42
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
Quoting: HatterTParty
Believe me, I’m not saying turcotte wins a cup either. No way. I’m just talking individual performance when I brought him up.

As for the young core, I Agree it’s more unspectacular than previous years. Mitchell projects more like Duncan to me. With boqvist (sorry to bring this up), I just want a coach who will actually use him the right way. He’s never gonna be a defensive stand out, he just won’t. So use him in a positive way that promotes his offensive prowess. As for the rest of the core, as you said, it doesn’t seem to match the level 2009 had. Even if we did, coaching is a huge part of the process and JC is not an NHL coach.

Getting top 3 would obviously change that, but the odds of lightning striking two years straight is nil. I could also see the NHL scraping the lottery system this year. I’ve heard rumors on it anyway.



Odds are the same as they were last year, the odds reset with each lottery so could happen as it did last year. Look at the years they drafted Kane and Toews. I can't see them totally scrapping it although I could see them modifying it. For example, if they go with a 24 team playoff, then those teams wouldn't qualify for the lottery and will pick based on playoff performance and regular season which would suck for the Hawks. Of course the NHL wants revenue so to have NYR, Hawks, MTL which may mean out of the lottery.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage