Quoting: palhal
So many teams are close to the cap, players will follow the money. Teams might overpay for a player in UFA but at least they don't have to give any assets.
What's better value? Trouba at 8m which costs you Terry and a first, or signing lets's say DeMelo at 4m, keeping Terry and the first rounder, and still have 4m in cap to spend elsewhere.
In the short term, I think that makes sense. But that’s not the relevant conversation. I think Anaheim looks at it like this:
1) They have a plethora of F prospects
2) They have a dearth of RHD prospects
3) There is not much high ceiling D talent in this draft, especially at the Bruins pick
4) They need to acquire someone who will be around in like 3-4 years when they’re competitive again and I don’t think they’d hand someone like Demelo a contract longer than 3 years
5) There’s no UFA RHD’s that they’d be willing to sign for 6 years that will come to Anaheim for a lower cap hit than Trouba either this off-season or next.
So yeah I think Anaheim from a long term value perspective would deal from a point of strength with disposable assets to fill a need that would be difficult to fill otherwise.