SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Handshake Dependant Trades with CHI and NJD

Créé par: Chapee44
Équipe: 2020-21 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 15 mai 2020
Publié: 15 mai 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
At 10 overall my order of possible wishes would be: Raymond, Stutzle, Rossi, Askarov, Lundell.
If we drafted Askarov we could then make a decision with either him or UPL as to who we want to keep and who is the piece to go to market. The decision doesn't have to be made this year either. Hopefully we don't Toronto-Tuukka ourselves lol
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1925 000 $
1900 000 $
21 500 000 $
21 000 000 $
1980 000 $
43 000 000 $
87 000 000 $
1800 000 $
23 000 000 $
23 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
1700 000 $
Transactions
1.
BUF
  1. Zacha, Pavel
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (VAN)
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (ARI)
Détails additionnels:
10 and 17 overall
NJD
  1. Montour, Brandon [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (BUF)
Détails additionnels:
7 overall
2.
BUF
CHI
  1. Pilut, Lawrence [Droits de RFA]
  2. Thompson, Tage [Droits de RFA]
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
17 Overall
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de ARI
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de DAL
2021
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2022
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $76 915 725 $1 487 500 $4 337 500 $4 584 275 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 6
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
845 000 $845 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 875 000 $3 875 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance637 500 $$638K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
889 166 $889 166 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 mai 2020 à 16 h 7
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,075
Mentions "j'aime": 1,486
throw in your 2020 4th and Devils accept. also you're not getting Stutzle or Raymond at 10, Lundell most likely.
Chapee44 a aimé ceci.
15 mai 2020 à 16 h 8
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,299
Mentions "j'aime": 981
Quoting: zyyyp
throw in your 2020 4th and Devils accept. also you're not getting Stutzle or Raymond at 10, Lundell most likely.


I thought 5th but I can switch to 4th
zyyyp a aimé ceci.
15 mai 2020 à 16 h 8
#3
burn the pegulas
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 2,082
Mentions "j'aime": 1,293
the only player that will be available at 10 is lundell don't get your hopes up
zyyyp a aimé ceci.
15 mai 2020 à 16 h 9
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,299
Mentions "j'aime": 981
Quoting: chloewoj
the only player that will be available at 10 is lundell don't get your hopes up


Rossi and Raymond are small and we know how that goes. Ask DeBrincat... But I would be perfectly content with Lundell. Goalies are weird too, Askarov could be there.
chloewoj a aimé ceci.
15 mai 2020 à 16 h 17
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,124
Mentions "j'aime": 14,140
This team investing another 1st round pick in a goalie (lehner trade) will be the straw that finally breaks the camel's back that is my being a fan.

Good lord
gretzkyghosts et dzmets a aimé ceci.
15 mai 2020 à 16 h 18
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
0% chance of Stutzle being available at number 10, Doubt Rossi will be either. Raymond could be 50/50 Lundell it's quite possible. Detroit could be the wild card Yzerman always drafts outside the box. So i could see him drafting Yaraslov Askarov if we get the #4 overall pick. Depending on what happens. We need a world class Goaltender and Askarov provides it.
dzmets a aimé ceci.
15 mai 2020 à 16 h 21
#7
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
Draft Perfetti. He's pretty good and might be available with 10th. Dunno really.
Chapee44 a aimé ceci.
15 mai 2020 à 17 h 11
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 2,709
Mentions "j'aime": 1,053
I think the rfa contract numbers are too low for strome, kahun and oloffson. If Strome would take only 3 per I think Chicago keeps him no doubt
SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
15 mai 2020 à 17 h 17
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,348
Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
2020 1st round pick (ARI) + 2020 1st round pick (VAN) >= Montour, Brandon [RFA Rights] + 2020 1st round pick (BUF) + 2020 4th round pick (BUF)
More or less Zacha for free.
Of course Buffalo would make this trade.

Strome, Dylan [RFA Rights] > Thompson, Tage [RFA Rights] + 2020 1st round pick (VAN) 17th overall
Määttä, Olli >=< Pilut, Lawrence [RFA Rights]
Of course Buffalo would make this trade.

Buffalo moves down 3 spots in the draft, gets a veteran LHD, a true #2 center and #3 center while giving up a good RHD and two unproven NHL players. This would make the Buffalo GM the front runner for GM of the year.
dzmets a aimé ceci.
15 mai 2020 à 17 h 36
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
2020 1st round pick (ARI) + 2020 1st round pick (VAN) >= Montour, Brandon [RFA Rights] + 2020 1st round pick (BUF) + 2020 4th round pick (BUF)
More or less Zacha for free.
Of course Buffalo would make this trade.

Strome, Dylan [RFA Rights] > Thompson, Tage [RFA Rights] + 2020 1st round pick (VAN) 17th overall.
Määttä, Olli >=< Pilut, Lawrence [RFA Rights]
Of course Buffalo would make this trade.

Buffalo moves down 3 spots in the draft, gets a veteran LHD, a true #2 center and #3 center while giving up a good RHD and two unproven NHL players. This would make the Buffalo GM the front runner for GM of the year.


Chicago wouldn't agree to this. Tage hasn't showed much and is turning 23 in October. Hawks have too many 3rd line borderline 2nd line prospects, Pilut would get lost with Carlsson, Beaudin, Krys, Vlasic...no use for him. If it was the 17th pick and a good prospect or good role player different story but no thanks on the borderline AHL players.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
15 mai 2020 à 18 h 39
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,299
Mentions "j'aime": 981
Quoting: dzmets
I think the rfa contract numbers are too low for strome, kahun and oloffson. If Strome would take only 3 per I think Chicago keeps him no doubt


I appreciate that. I was optimistic and on Kahun and Strome didn't buy any UFA years to keep cost down. I think a smaller contract is likely for Olofsson. He had one good season but it was marred by a lengthy injury. He'll get a bridge of sorts.
15 mai 2020 à 18 h 44
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,124
Mentions "j'aime": 6,131
Quoting: ChiHawk
Chicago wouldn't agree to this. Tage hasn't showed much and is turning 23 in October. Hawks have too many 3rd line borderline 2nd line prospects, Pilut would get lost with Carlsson, Beaudin, Krys, Vlasic...no use for him. If it was the 17th pick and a good prospect or good role player different story but no thanks on the borderline AHL players.


Pilut is our 2nd best lhd. He spent the year in rochester because our gm is absolutely awful- he rounded up 9 league average d, couldnt move them for what he thought he could, and blocked pilut who had the misfortune of being ahl eligible without needing to clear waivers. If i had to move pilut, samuelsson, of johnson (our recent late first/early second round lhd), pilut is not the first i would move.
15 mai 2020 à 19 h 44
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,348
Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
Quoting: sabres89
Pilut is our 2nd best lhd. He spent the year in rochester because our gm is absolutely awful- he rounded up 9 league average d, couldnt move them for what he thought he could, and blocked pilut who had the misfortune of being ahl eligible without needing to clear waivers. If i had to move pilut, samuelsson, of johnson (our recent late first/early second round lhd), pilut is not the first i would move.


Pilut spent a year in Rochester because he was not ready for the NHL. Any one who watched him play could see that he did not measure up to NHL caliber.
He was called up last year and did not perform up to standard. He did better this year, but still was at best our 3rd pairing.
Because he picked Buffalo over all other NHL teams after winning the Salming award is the ONLY reason I would not trade him.
While you may not want to move Pilut, both trades heavily favor the Sabres. Sure I may trade a defenseman other than Pilut but adding 2 centers, while giving up a RHD and moving down 3 spots in draft is too good to pass up.
15 mai 2020 à 19 h 45
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 5,348
Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
Quoting: ChiHawk
Chicago wouldn't agree to this. Tage hasn't showed much and is turning 23 in October. Hawks have too many 3rd line borderline 2nd line prospects, Pilut would get lost with Carlsson, Beaudin, Krys, Vlasic...no use for him. If it was the 17th pick and a good prospect or good role player different story but no thanks on the borderline AHL players.


Did I not say the same thing.
Both trades heavily favor the Sabres.
If offered they would be fools to pass up either one, especially both.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
15 mai 2020 à 21 h 4
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 8,124
Mentions "j'aime": 6,131
Quoting: gretzkyghosts
Pilut spent a year in Rochester because he was not ready for the NHL. Any one who watched him play could see that he did not measure up to NHL caliber.
He was called up last year and did not perform up to standard. He did better this year, but still was at best our 3rd pairing.
Because he picked Buffalo over all other NHL teams after winning the Salming award is the ONLY reason I would not trade him.
While you may not want to move Pilut, both trades heavily favor the Sabres. Sure I may trade a defenseman other than Pilut but adding 2 centers, while giving up a RHD and moving down 3 spots in draft is too good to pass up.


Mostly agree, i was more replying to the idea that pilut was some 24 year old scrub tweener, which i dont believe is at all the case.
gretzkyghosts a aimé ceci.
15 mai 2020 à 23 h 59
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
Quoting: sabres89
Mostly agree, i was more replying to the idea that pilut was some 24 year old scrub tweener, which i dont believe is at all the case.


I’m not sure I agree he’s a bonafide 2nd line player but even then the Hawks have a logjam on both d sides. On the left we can use a bonafide 1st liner to allow Keith to play on the 2nd line and of course we won’t get that plus the 17 pick so I’d say a better prospect would be in order that is higher reward but needs work.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage