Quoting: mhockey91
Dude, pulv couldn’t even make a thin Edmonton team. Chances are both of them aren’t gonna be NHLers. It’s a very fair trade. Two former high picks who won’t reach their potential at draft day. You’re not getting much for Pulv
Puljujarvi was never given the chance to play in Edmonton. He refuses to play here because of that, not because of some make-believe narrative that he's not good enough. He spent more time away from Edmonton's big three centers than he did with them throughout his entire time here. He was saddled to the corpse of Milan Lucic. McLellan wouldn't even keep him in the top six for a night, let alone a season. Go look at his TOI stats and let me know if that's any proper way to develop a prospect. Management refused to keep him in Finland or the AHL, refused to get him an English tutor right away, and the coaching staff refused to play him.
Quoting: mhockey91
1 for 1 trade is very equal. Edmonton should take it
No, it's not. See my reply. These are not equivalent players.
Quoting: mhockey91
Okay I didn’t know about mantha. Insert random 700K D. Dell may be a slight overpay but he’ll probably get around 2 million. Granlund Will be your 13F and you couldn’t afford Mikkel
This explains almost everything anyone needs to know about this AGM. You don't know what you're talking about and acting like you do. Your values are atrocious and you arent doing Edmonton a single favour outside of low-balling Hoffman and extending Bear long-term. A little bit of research or finding other AGMs to at least back up some of the moves you want to make is literally the least you could do.
Like why would Granlund extend with the team that threw him away on waivers when he could go back home to make just as much money, if not more? Literally zero thought process here.