SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Minimal Cap Increase

Créé par: BeukeBOOMED
Équipe: 2020-21 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 6 mai 2020
Publié: 6 mai 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Minimal changes until following year when cap space clears up more. Pat Maroon signing could give physicality and depth at forward, and why not.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
45 200 000 $
14 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
31 000 000 $
3875 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
32 250 000 $
Transactions
NYR
  1. Dahlén, Jonathan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (SJS)
SJS
  1. Georgiev, Alexandar [Droits de RFA]
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de NYR
Logo de CAR
Logo de SJS
Logo de NYR
Logo de DAL
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
2021
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de BUF
Logo de NYR
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2022
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 000 000 $74 649 799 $0 $8 062 500 $7 350 201 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 200 000 $5 200 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 700 000 $5 700 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
833 333 $833 333 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 mai 2020 à 16 h 5
#1
Go Sharks Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 1,583
Mentions "j'aime": 656
San Jose declines, we wouldn't even give you our 2020 2nd for him
KeepUps15 a aimé ceci.
6 mai 2020 à 16 h 7
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 95
Mentions "j'aime": 6
I guess have fun with sub .900 Martin Jones
Sagecoll a aimé ceci.
6 mai 2020 à 16 h 12
#3
Go Sharks Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 1,583
Mentions "j'aime": 656
Quoting: BeukeBOOMED
I guess have fun with sub .900 Martin Jones


If you quote my post it will give me a notification

We could sign a better goalie in free agency without giving anyone up
Klara et KeepUps15 a aimé ceci.
6 mai 2020 à 16 h 15
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 37,914
Mentions "j'aime": 19,293
Quoting: BeukeBOOMED
I guess have fun with sub .900 Martin Jones


So your logic is because San Jose is getting fleeced here and declines, you say screw you? There are like 14 goalies available on the market this year, sharks arent going to get bent over
6 mai 2020 à 16 h 30
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Yeah I don't think the Rangers are going to go for that, they most likely got better deals at the deadlines. But I mean why should the Rangers deal Georgiev, they've expressed they want to keep him and the opposite of Lundqvist. Besides, over the last 2 seasons Georgiev is a top 10 goalie among those who've faced 2000 shots.

Screen-Shot-2020-05-06-at-4-21-55-PM
6 mai 2020 à 16 h 50
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 95
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: JumboJoe
If you quote my post it will give me a notification

We could sign a better goalie in free agency without giving anyone up


Besides Holtby (who is 31), Lehner (29) and Markstrom (30) the UFA market isn't that attractive and they're all old. I honestly don't know enough about Dahlen just wanted a winger back in the trade and I know he's supposed to be good. Is the potential of securing a longterm number 1 goalie for a winger prospect and a 2nd too much to give up on a team desperate for the position? Maybe? But goalie is the hardest position to find in this league.
6 mai 2020 à 16 h 51
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 4,422
Mentions "j'aime": 1,457
Quoting: BeukeBOOMED
I guess have fun with sub .900 Martin Jones


So your saying that they should do this trade because Martin Jones is bad?
I have heard that San Jose is gonna rebuild
6 mai 2020 à 16 h 53
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 95
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: Sagecoll
Yeah I don't think the Rangers are going to go for that, they most likely got better deals at the deadlines. But I mean why should the Rangers deal Georgiev, they've expressed they want to keep him and the opposite of Lundqvist. Besides, over the last 2 seasons Georgiev is a top 10 goalie among those who've faced 2000 shots.

Screen-Shot-2020-05-06-at-4-21-55-PM


Well personally, I will be very disappointed if the Rangers buyout Lundqvist but I know that option is on the table. Georgiev being a "top 10 goalie" only helps my position on this trade from the San Jose fans perspective. Anyways we're just having fun on here
6 mai 2020 à 16 h 54
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 95
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: keep_ups12
So your saying that they should do this trade because Martin Jones is bad?
I have heard that San Jose is gonna rebuild


Rebuilding with a 24 year old goalie sounds like a decent move to me. They have Kane, Karlsson, Hertl, Couture right now so there's still a lot of potential for that team.
6 mai 2020 à 16 h 55
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 4,422
Mentions "j'aime": 1,457
Quoting: BeukeBOOMED
Rebuilding with a 24 year old goalie sounds like a decent move to me. They have Kane, Karlsson, Hertl, Couture right now so there's still a lot of potential for that team.


yea a backup goalie. You totally forget about Burns, Karlsson Vlassic etc
6 mai 2020 à 16 h 57
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 95
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: keep_ups12
yea a backup goalie. You totally forget about Burns, Karlsson Vlassic etc


As a Rangers fan I'd say Georgiev could definitely be a number 1. I said Karlsson. Burns yea and Vlasic too but these guys are all getting old.
6 mai 2020 à 16 h 58
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 4,422
Mentions "j'aime": 1,457
Quoting: BeukeBOOMED
As a Rangers fan I'd say Georgiev could definitely be a number 1. I said Karlsson. Burns yea and Vlasic too but these guys are all getting old.


He could be a fringe starter
6 mai 2020 à 19 h 40
#13
B
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 7,862
Mentions "j'aime": 1,423
Need at least 4m for bonuses, maybe get away with, let's say 2.5m. You have 300k and no spare d. Hank will retire and zero reason to simply give away part of our Russian duo. Smith is better of buried than bought out, better yet traded as minor cap dump
6 mai 2020 à 20 h 43
#14
Go Sharks Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2020
Messages: 1,583
Mentions "j'aime": 656
Quoting: BeukeBOOMED
Besides Holtby (who is 31), Lehner (29) and Markstrom (30) the UFA market isn't that attractive and they're all old. I honestly don't know enough about Dahlen just wanted a winger back in the trade and I know he's supposed to be good. Is the potential of securing a longterm number 1 goalie for a winger prospect and a 2nd too much to give up on a team desperate for the position? Maybe? But goalie is the hardest position to find in this league.


Holtby isn't even a good option. Dahlen has a high potential and could be a great 3rd liner in a couple years if he chooses to play in North America. That 2nd is also very close to a 1st and we need picks giving how depleted our prospect pool is. We just got Melnichuk who could be a back up as soon as the 20-21 season. Chances are he starts his NHL career in the 21-22 season, but he could potentially be a starter. Khudobin and Greiss are also viable options. We just won't give up a potential middle 6 winger and a 2nd rounder (almost 1st) in a very good draft.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage