SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

who says no

Créé par: leafs101
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 3 mai 2020
Publié: 3 mai 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
1800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
78 500 000 $
1700 000 $
21 000 000 $
43 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
CHI
  1. Engvall, Pierre
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
3.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (DAL)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (DAL)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de DAL
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de DAL
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $80 423 449 $0 $2 100 000 $1 076 551 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
3 mai 2020 à 11 h 14
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 689
Mentions "j'aime": 131
Leafs on the Rangers and Hawks trades
3 mai 2020 à 11 h 21
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,783
Mentions "j'aime": 2,005
Adding Fox is intriguing, but definitely not to play Reilly. Reilly needs a solid stay at home partner - think Karlsson and Methot. And as much as this idea is intriguing, I think you may get some window dressing Marner. Play Fox with Muzzin, and it might be interesting.

The Nylander deal is neither here nor there, but he wouldn't be in the top 6 at all. Kappy would move up.

Where is Dermott?

Johnsson is whatever. He is moving.

Overall, I see a weakened forward unit and a blueline that is marginally better at keeping the puck out of the net. So, in conclusion, no as much as adding Fox is interesting. Just not enough defensive improvement to justify the move and offset the loss in offense. Not sure the Rangers do it either just based on the contact.
3 mai 2020 à 11 h 26
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,202
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
Quoting: swinny
Adding Fox is intriguing, but definitely not to play Reilly. Reilly needs a solid stay at home partner - think Karlsson and Methot. And as much as this idea is intriguing, I think you may get some window dressing Marner. Play Fox with Muzzin, and it might be interesting.

The Nylander deal is neither here nor there, but he wouldn't be in the top 6 at all. Kappy would move up.

Where is Dermott?

Johnsson is whatever. He is moving.

Overall, I see a weakened forward unit and a blueline that is marginally better at keeping the puck out of the net. So, in conclusion, no as much as adding Fox is interesting. Just not enough defensive improvement to justify the move and offset the loss in offense. Not sure the Rangers do it either just based on the contact.


I meant to trade Dermott for picks. From what I hear fox is also very, very good defensively so that's why I put him with rielly, but the pairings can be mixed around as needed. Kapanen is better no doubt, but A. Nylander needs a fresh start, so I thought maybe by playing with his brother and a great mentor in tavares, the leafs might be able to get his career back on track. And yeah I'm not sure which team says no because of the contract, but I just find it interesting and somewhat feasible.
3 mai 2020 à 11 h 42
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,783
Mentions "j'aime": 2,005
Quoting: leafs101
I meant to trade Dermott for picks. From what I hear fox is also very, very good defensively so that's why I put him with rielly, but the pairings can be mixed around as needed. Kapanen is better no doubt, but A. Nylander needs a fresh start, so I thought maybe by playing with his brother and a great mentor in tavares, the leafs might be able to get his career back on track. And yeah I'm not sure which team says no because of the contract, but I just find it interesting and somewhat feasible.


It is interesting..... particularily long term when you think Reilly, Sandin, Fox and Liligren. Could be a helluva top 4. Get the long term thinking. Feasible? That's a debate. But interesting? Don't see many Leafs fans that would complain about that future top 4.
3 mai 2020 à 11 h 45
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 11,202
Mentions "j'aime": 5,207
Quoting: swinny
It is interesting..... particularily long term when you think Reilly, Sandin, Fox and Liligren. Could be a helluva top 4. Get the long term thinking. Feasible? That's a debate. But interesting? Don't see many Leafs fans that would complain about that future top 4.


yeah I'd do it in a heartbeat, and NYR still has a good right side without him. Whether they do it or not, I don't know. And I know plenty of leafs fans would hesitate to give up Marner as well.
3 mai 2020 à 11 h 56
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 5,011
Mentions "j'aime": 1,636
Quoting: swinny
Adding Fox is intriguing, but definitely not to play Reilly. Reilly needs a solid stay at home partner - think Karlsson and Methot. And as much as this idea is intriguing, I think you may get some window dressing Marner. Play Fox with Muzzin, and it might be interesting.

The Nylander deal is neither here nor there, but he wouldn't be in the top 6 at all. Kappy would move up.

Where is Dermott?

Johnsson is whatever. He is moving.

Overall, I see a weakened forward unit and a blueline that is marginally better at keeping the puck out of the net. So, in conclusion, no as much as adding Fox is interesting. Just not enough defensive improvement to justify the move and offset the loss in offense. Not sure the Rangers do it either just based on the contact.


Fox is excellent defensively.
3 mai 2020 à 11 h 57
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 5,011
Mentions "j'aime": 1,636
Quoting: leafs101
yeah I'd do it in a heartbeat, and NYR still has a good right side without him. Whether they do it or not, I don't know. And I know plenty of leafs fans would hesitate to give up Marner as well.


I heard on Re-edit that every GM across the league is sick & tired of Marner’s antics, they want nothing to do with him. So basically there’s no chance he gets moved. https://www.reddit.com/r/leafs/comments/g8fnuo/mitch_marner_is_the_heartbeat_of_the_current/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
3 mai 2020 à 11 h 59
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,783
Mentions "j'aime": 2,005
Quoting: MitchMarnerElite
Fox is excellent defensively.


Still not the guy I would play with Reilly. Has too much offensive skill for that. In this scenario: i play with Muzzin.

Spreads it out.
3 mai 2020 à 12 h 7
#9
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 5,011
Mentions "j'aime": 1,636
Quoting: swinny
Still not the guy I would play with Reilly. Has too much offensive skill for that. In this scenario: i play with Muzzin.

Spreads it out.


Well that would work as well but I was thinking have Muzzin-DeMelo as your shutdown pairing against other teams’ top players.
3 mai 2020 à 12 h 11
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,783
Mentions "j'aime": 2,005
Quoting: MitchMarnerElite
Well that would work as well but I was thinking have Muzzin-DeMelo as your shutdown pairing against other teams’ top players.


If Fox is that good defensively, he would donthe job as well. Flip side is any team worth their salt will make sure their blueline is familiar with each other kn some level. Muzzin-Fox for 58 minutes..... Muzzin - DeMelo for 2.
3 mai 2020 à 12 h 20
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: swinny
Adding Fox is intriguing, but definitely not to play Reilly. Reilly needs a solid stay at home partner - think Karlsson and Methot. And as much as this idea is intriguing, I think you may get some window dressing Marner. Play Fox with Muzzin, and it might be interesting.

The Nylander deal is neither here nor there, but he wouldn't be in the top 6 at all. Kappy would move up.

Where is Dermott?

Johnsson is whatever. He is moving.

Overall, I see a weakened forward unit and a blueline that is marginally better at keeping the puck out of the net. So, in conclusion, no as much as adding Fox is interesting. Just not enough defensive improvement to justify the move and offset the loss in offense. Not sure the Rangers do it either just based on the contact.


Fox is really good defensively, the only rookie d man particularly close to his defensive impact was Marino
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage