SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Fixing the defense

Créé par: Hammerwise
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 30 avr. 2020
Publié: 30 avr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3800 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
3950 000 $
31 950 000 $
3900 000 $
3950 000 $
21 550 000 $
32 850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
31 750 000 $
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
PHI
  1. Dermott, Travis
  2. Kapanen, Kasperi
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
2.
3.
TOR
  1. Novak, Thomas
  2. Watson, Austin
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (MIN)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de MIN
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $80 942 283 $0 $132 500 $557 717 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
817 500 $817 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 avr. 2020 à 7 h 0
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,379
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Keep Watson away
Hammerwise et Jameshgfgn a aimé ceci.
30 avr. 2020 à 7 h 27
#2
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,072
Mentions "j'aime": 22,465
Look at the Flyers roster. They have lots of wingers, especially right wingers and plenty of LHD. What's really in the deal for the Flyers?
Hammerwise a aimé ceci.
30 avr. 2020 à 7 h 28
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 6,310
Mentions "j'aime": 2,226
Quoting: BCAPP
Keep Watson away


I added Watson, as he plays a nice two way game, is just 28 yrs old and is cheap/signed for 3 years, but ideally that's the type of player needed here. Jarnkrot would be another nice add, but Watson is more physical.
30 avr. 2020 à 7 h 30
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 6,310
Mentions "j'aime": 2,226
Quoting: palhal
Look at the Flyers roster. They have lots of wingers, especially right wingers and plenty of LHD. What's really in the deal for the Flyers?


Agree, I look at it like this Kapanen > Laughton, Myers > Dermott, its possible the Leafs have to add a bit more, simply because it doesn't fit the Flyers, but Laughtons two way, gritty game and Myers age, RH and upside fits whats needed in TOR.

And Philly's RWs all can play LW or C (Giroux, Koneckny, Voracek)
30 avr. 2020 à 7 h 44
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,072
Mentions "j'aime": 22,465
Quoting: Hammerwise
Agree, I look at it like this Kapanen > Laughton, Myers > Dermott, its possible the Leafs have to add a bit more, simply because it doesn't fit the Flyers, but Laughtons two way, gritty game and Myers age, RH and upside fits whats needed in TOR.

And Philly's RWs all can play LW or C (Giroux, Koneckny, Voracek)


Actually talent wise it's pretty fair deal. And the Flyers do get extra controllable years. I've been a supporter of Kerfoot and hate the thought of having him leaving cause in would cause a real hole especially if Tavares or Matthews ever went on LTIR.
Many Leafs fans are enamoured with Clifford. I'm not with his play or the fact it cost the Leafs a second rounder instead of third if he signs with the Leafs.
Strange that so many fans...including Leaf fans are so smitten by other teams RHDs. Myers and Manson seem to be their sweethearts. Interesting that Liljegren is a full two years younger than Myers but so some reason so many think he a bust, despite that his development seems to be as it should be.
Hammerwise a aimé ceci.
30 avr. 2020 à 8 h 0
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 6,310
Mentions "j'aime": 2,226
Quoting: palhal
Actually talent wise it's pretty fair deal. And the Flyers do get extra controllable years. I've been a supporter of Kerfoot and hate the thought of having him leaving cause in would cause a real hole especially if Tavares or Matthews ever went on LTIR.
Many Leafs fans are enamoured with Clifford. I'm not with his play or the fact it cost the Leafs a second rounder instead of third if he signs with the Leafs.
Strange that so many fans...including Leaf fans are so smitten by other teams RHDs. Myers and Manson seem to be their sweethearts. Interesting that Liljegren is a full two years younger than Myers but so some reason so many think he a bust, despite that his development seems to be as it should be.


Agree with your thinking...Not a fan of Manson, Myers is just a bit further along in his development, and the idea of Liljegren and rasmus both playing as rookies IMO creates a worry. Myers I think is a top 4 RH, whos young and solid, but hes not the next erik karlsson. Stephen Johns is just 27 yrs old, RH, big guy, signed reasonably and those two, aid the development of the defense going forward with rasmus and liljegren, so we can stop with the 1 yr temporary fixes on defense. Addition of those two young-ish behemoths on defense help both in physicality, talent, and long term more than any dealt for them.

IMO the leafs lack three things: defense, physicality and team defense. Clifford, Martin, Simmonds, Reeves are all UFAs for that physicality, but the idea of adding 25 yr old laughton (a 25-30 pt) two way, gritty, physical guy who can play LW or C goes a lot further than his pt production, same as, to a lesser degree in Watson., really addresses team defense more so than anyone on the current roster.

And as for the trades, you have to give to get, dealing from areas of strength to address weaknesses, and I think the PHI deal does that for TOR. The Kerfoot deal is one sided and he is by far the best player in that deal, but its also about cap space.
30 avr. 2020 à 11 h 14
#7
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,072
Mentions "j'aime": 22,465
Quoting: Hammerwise
Agree with your thinking...Not a fan of Manson, Myers is just a bit further along in his development, and the idea of Liljegren and rasmus both playing as rookies IMO creates a worry. Myers I think is a top 4 RH, whos young and solid, but hes not the next erik karlsson. Stephen Johns is just 27 yrs old, RH, big guy, signed reasonably and those two, aid the development of the defense going forward with rasmus and liljegren, so we can stop with the 1 yr temporary fixes on defense. Addition of those two young-ish behemoths on defense help both in physicality, talent, and long term more than any dealt for them.

IMO the leafs lack three things: defense, physicality and team defense. Clifford, Martin, Simmonds, Reeves are all UFAs for that physicality, but the idea of adding 25 yr old laughton (a 25-30 pt) two way, gritty, physical guy who can play LW or C goes a lot further than his pt production, same as, to a lesser degree in Watson., really addresses team defense more so than anyone on the current roster.

And as for the trades, you have to give to get, dealing from areas of strength to address weaknesses, and I think the PHI deal does that for TOR. The Kerfoot deal is one sided and he is by far the best player in that deal, but its also about cap space.


You mentioned Laughton. When he has played in Toronto, he might have played his best hockey. Maybe Mum's homecoming or something.
Hammerwise a aimé ceci.
30 avr. 2020 à 18 h 9
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,379
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: Hammerwise
I added Watson, as he plays a nice two way game, is just 28 yrs old and is cheap/signed for 3 years, but ideally that's the type of player needed here. Jarnkrot would be another nice add, but Watson is more physical.


I don't want him specifically. Not his game.
Hammerwise a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage