SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

31 in 31 attempt

Créé par: vosse9
Équipe: 2020-21 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 18 avr. 2020
Publié: 19 avr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
1950 000 $
21 750 000 $
2950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
66 000 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $70 252 166 $0 $0 $11 247 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
820 000 $820 000 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 2
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 avr. 2020 à 9 h 12
#1
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,501
Mentions "j'aime": 22,667
A crazy overpay for Barrie for what he contributes as an NHL Dman.
mytduxfan a aimé ceci.
19 avr. 2020 à 9 h 21
#2
Démarrer sujet
vosse9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 651
Mentions "j'aime": 105
Quoting: palhal
A crazy overpay for Barrie for what he contributes as an NHL Dman.


Figured they need a top 4 dman and other option would be packaging young player and pick for it
19 avr. 2020 à 9 h 41
#3
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,501
Mentions "j'aime": 22,667
Quoting: vosse9
Figured they need a top 4 dman and other option would be packaging young player and pick for it


Barrie is not a top 4 Dman (whatever that means). Leafs were depleted on defence due to injuries last season, did not use the Barrie on the PK last season. Barrie is poor at even strength. He just doesn't defend. He's good on the PP. If that's your definition of a top 4 Dman and worth of 6m...go for it. IMO Barrie was the worse Leaf Dman last year.
19 avr. 2020 à 19 h 44
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: palhal
A crazy overpay for Barrie for what he contributes as an NHL Dman.


Agreed, he's a guy you want getting sheltered 5-on-5 minutes and a tonne of PP time. I wouldn't pay $6M for him. His offensive numbers are impressive, but his defensive game is atrocious and he's going to cost more goals than he creates.

Quoting: vosse9
Figured they need a top 4 dman and other option would be packaging young player and pick for it


Why? Lindholm - Manson, Fowler - Gudbranson is a solid top 4. We need a young top pairing RHD or prospect with that kind of potential and/or an experienced bottom pairing RHD and PP specialist.
20 avr. 2020 à 12 h 48
#5
Potvin Sucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 410
Mentions "j'aime": 106
Quoting: mytduxfan
Agreed, he's a guy you want getting sheltered 5-on-5 minutes and a tonne of PP time. I wouldn't pay $6M for him. His offensive numbers are impressive, but his defensive game is atrocious and he's going to cost more goals than he creates.



Why? Lindholm - Manson, Fowler - Gudbranson is a solid top 4. We need a young top pairing RHD or prospect with that kind of potential and/or an experienced bottom pairing RHD and PP specialist.


Gudbransson is trash.
22 avr. 2020 à 11 h 16
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: Widowmaker
Gudbransson is trash.


He was in VAN, but he wasn't that bad in PIT and has been solid in ANA. I suspect this is because his value has dropped every time he's been traded and so the team's demands on him get lower and lower. Essentially, he wasn't bought into the ANA as a former 4OA pick and expected to carry his pairing. RD really wasn't the problem with the team this season. Literally no offensive creativity whatsoever. Not enough elite talent at every position except GT, but especially at forward.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage