SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Signings

Los Angeles Kings signed Cole Hults (2 Years / $1,050,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


11 avr. 2020 à 18 h 6
#1
Cole Hults has signed a new contract with the Los Angeles Kings.
Contrat d’entrée
Contrats comparablesCOMPARER CE CONTRAT
SIGNÉ PAR: Rob Blake
Durée: 2 ans
Valeur: 2 100 000 $
Statut à l’échéance du contrat: UFA (Aucune OQ)
% Cap Info-bulle: 1,14
Contrat signé avec: Logo de Kings de Los AngelesKings de Los Angeles
Date de signature: 11 avr. 2020
Source: CapFriendly

Cole Hults a signé un contrat de 2 ans d'une valeur de 2 100 000 $ avec les Kings de Los Angeles, le 11 avr. 2020. Le contrat comporte un cap hit de 925 000 $.

SAISONClauseCap hitInfo-bulleAAV Info-bulleBonis de performanceInfo-bulleBonis de signatureInfo-bulleSalaire de baseInfo-bulleSalaire totalInfo-bulleSalaire mineuresInfo-bulle
2020-21925 000 $1 050 000 $125 000 $92 500 $832 500 $925 000 $70 000 $
2021-22925 000 $1 050 000 $125 000 $92 500 $832 500 $925 000 $70 000 $
TOTAL1 850 000 $2 100 000 $250 000 $185 000 $1 665 000 $1 850 000 $140 000 $
Offre qualificativeInfo-bulle: 874 125 $
11 avr. 2020 à 18 h 38
#2
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,695
Mentions "j'aime": 24,617
Even before we know what the actual ticket price is going to be, I love this signing as I think this kid is headed for the NHL.
ZiggyPalffy a aimé ceci.
11 avr. 2020 à 18 h 50
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Even before we know what the actual ticket price is going to be, I love this signing as I think this kid is headed for the NHL.


May I have your player analysis please???
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
11 avr. 2020 à 18 h 52
#4
AwesomeMatthews
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 1,381
Mentions "j'aime": 1,013
Hult right there, I'll see myself out.
weirfanno1 a aimé ceci.
11 avr. 2020 à 19 h 18
#5
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,695
Mentions "j'aime": 24,617
Quoting: Bf3351
May I have your player analysis please???


He had a real good career at Penn State, a successful program, and I saw him about 10 times on the Big Ten network. I liked his skating and passing ability, and I didn't notice him on the ice for any silly goals. (In contrast, whenever I see a silly goal scored against our rivals down the freeway, it seems that one of Fowler, Lindholm or Manson is on the ice. despite their vaunted defensive prowess. This always makes me wonder about commitment.)
ZiggyPalffy a aimé ceci.
11 avr. 2020 à 19 h 21
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Quoting: AwesomeMatthews
Hult right there, I'll see myself out.


Good!
AwesomeMatthews a aimé ceci.
11 avr. 2020 à 19 h 22
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Quoting: OldNYIfan
He had a real good career at Penn State, a successful program, and I saw him about 10 times on the Big Ten network. I liked his skating and passing ability, and I didn't notice him on the ice for any silly goals. (In contrast, whenever I see a silly goal scored against our rivals down the freeway, it seems that one of Fowler, Lindholm or Manson is on the ice. despite their vaunted defensive prowess. This always makes me wonder about commitment.)


Fair enough, thanks giving me the 411!
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
11 avr. 2020 à 21 h 23
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: OldNYIfan
He had a real good career at Penn State, a successful program, and I saw him about 10 times on the Big Ten network. I liked his skating and passing ability, and I didn't notice him on the ice for any silly goals. (In contrast, whenever I see a silly goal scored against our rivals down the freeway, it seems that one of Fowler, Lindholm or Manson is on the ice. despite their vaunted defensive prowess. This always makes me wonder about commitment.)


I have seen a lot of Penn St games as I have been following the penguins Nikita there.
I think this is pretty generous description.
Penn St was an absolutely loaded team. Which is represented in the in flux of signings off that team this year, and there will be more to come. The exudes is happening there as I think no one wants to be the last man standing there.
Having said that, the bulk of the talent and production on Penn St is in the forward lines. They really carried the team. If the forwards didn't play well, the team fell apart.
Guys like Phillips and Hults did what they had to do, but I think most people watching that team knew where the talent was coming from.

This isn't to rip the kid, but really lower expectations. This kid is not a 1st pairing guy. He's a 2nd pairing tops. Most likely a 3rd pairing if he gets to the NHL.
But that's a really big jump. There are a few defense men in the NCAA this year who really stood out. Like Mackey. They were noticeable on the ice. Penn st didn't really have any "noticable" defense men. That can be considered good and bad. Good in the sense you don't really notice the blame of the screw up when the other team scores. But also bad in the sense that the reason for that was the work of the forward lines. A lot of the players coming off of Penn St this year are considered either "2 way" or "defensive" forwards. Which explains a lot about not seeing silly goals.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage