SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

afraid yet

Créé par: Wqrrior
Équipe: 2020-21 Stars de Dallas
Date de création initiale: 5 avr. 2020
Publié: 5 avr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
65 575 000 $
33 350 000 $
32 875 000 $
42 850 000 $
1750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
32 850 000 $
1715 000 $
64 250 000 $
1850 000 $
Transactions
1.
DAL
  1. Domi, Max [Droits de RFA]
  2. Kulak, Brett
MTL
  1. Dickinson, Jason
  2. Lindell, Esa
Détails additionnels:
sure, people have their opinions about Lindell, but in terms of the actual value he carries, and MTL's needs, this checks the boxes
2.
DAL
  1. Weegar, MacKenzie [Droits de RFA]
FLA
  1. Faksa, Radek [Droits de RFA]
3.
DAL
  1. Bernier, Jonathan (1 500 000 $ retained)
DET
  1. Honka, Julius [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (DAL)
4.
DAL
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (TBL)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de BUF
2021
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de TBL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
2022
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
Logo de DAL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $83 616 199 $3 047 866 $2 582 500 $-2 116 199 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 875 000 $2 875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
9 850 000 $9 850 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Stars de Dallas
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
5 575 000 $5 575 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 350 000 $3 350 000 $
C
UFA - 3
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
850 000 $850 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Stars de Dallas
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
4 916 667 $4 916 667 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Stars de Dallas
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 137 500 $2 137 500 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Stars de Dallas
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Stars de Dallas
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 avr. 2020 à 20 h 42
#1
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 15,844
Mentions "j'aime": 8,548
Does Benn really fall to the 3rd line?
5 avr. 2020 à 20 h 45
#2
arky
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 6,676
Mentions "j'aime": 4,317
Sorry but Detroit says no. Bernier is the only NHL goalie in the system.
aedoran a aimé ceci.
5 avr. 2020 à 20 h 46
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
Quoting: mikearky
Sorry but Detroit says no. Bernier is the only NHL goalie in the system.


If DET pushes the UFA market anywhere, it's in goal. I don't think we are talking Lehner, but I could see Khudobin finally getting a chance to be a starter.
aedoran a aimé ceci.
5 avr. 2020 à 20 h 47
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
Quoting: MaxDomi13
Does Benn really fall to the 3rd line?


More about line balance. Instead of stacking the lines, instead now there are three very solid lines. Also allows one prospect to play with two established talents per line.
5 avr. 2020 à 20 h 50
#5
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 15,844
Mentions "j'aime": 8,548
Quoting: Wqrrior
More about line balance. Instead of stacking the lines, instead now there are three very solid lines. Also allows one prospect to play with two established talents per line.


yea
5 avr. 2020 à 21 h 25
#6
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 33,195
Mentions "j'aime": 20,728
Quoting: Wqrrior
If DET pushes the UFA market anywhere, it's in goal. I don't think we are talking Lehner, but I could see Khudobin finally getting a chance to be a starter.


I see detroit either going for Holtby cause I do not think washington will resign him, or they make a deal for murray (all depends on how well jarry does in the playoffs).
5 avr. 2020 à 21 h 30
#7
True Reverse Retro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 4,616
Mentions "j'aime": 3,032
I get what you're saying about balancing the top 3 lines, but I wouldn't pull Hintz off the top line. The speed between him, Gurianov, & Seguin was the Stars best offensive asset this season.

Hintz-Seguin-Gurianov
Robertson-Domi-Radulov
Benn-Pavelski-Fast

This gives the Stars a fast scoring line, a physical scoring line, and a 3rd line that is a bit of a combination of the two.

And instead of signing Thornton, just call up Dellandrea to fill that shutdown Center spot on the 4th line. He's in a prime position to take Pavelski's spot in a couple of years, but the reduced 4th line minutes are a great transition between the OHL and his future middle-6 role with Dallas.
Wqrrior a aimé ceci.
6 avr. 2020 à 0 h 11
#8
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
I'm opposed to moving both Dickinson and Faksa. It's quite rare to have two able defensive centers in a team, and seeing both go would eventually weaken us.

I still don't get the point on acquiring long-term d-men only to lose them in a year. In this scenario, either Weegar or Brodie is gone.

Bernier and Fedun trades are bit pointless. Would much rather just keep the picks and re-sign Khudobin at $3M.
6 avr. 2020 à 0 h 19
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
Quoting: justaBoss
I'm opposed to moving both Dickinson and Faksa. It's quite rare to have two able defensive centers in a team, and seeing both go would eventually weaken us.

I still don't get the point on acquiring long-term d-men only to lose them in a year. In this scenario, either Weegar or Brodie is gone.

Bernier and Fedun trades are bit pointless. Would much rather just keep the picks and re-sign Khudobin at $3M.



It would be Brodie. But then again, it's a chance idea. And considering Brodie is a free asset off free agency, there's not much of a loss. Trading for and losing a defender is a lot worse.

The idea is that Fast replaces Faksa's talents. iirc, he is pretty defensively inclined. I suppose I could reverse the Kulak - Dickinson part, although I figured MTL would only bite if a center was going back.

As for goalies, sure, if Khudobin agrees to come back. I feel like this is his last chance at a starter's position and he might follow the dollar bill and the expanded role. Bernier is far cheaper cap wise than any UFA of similar skill.
I also only moved Fedun because Tampa drastically overpays for meh guys on cheap cap hits. He's really just a replaceable 7th D, so get what you can for him.
6 avr. 2020 à 0 h 30
#10
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
Quoting: Wqrrior
It would be Brodie. But then again, it's a chance idea. And considering Brodie is a free asset off free agency, there's not much of a loss. Trading for and losing a defender is a lot worse.

The idea is that Fast replaces Faksa's talents. iirc, he is pretty defensively inclined. I suppose I could reverse the Kulak - Dickinson part, although I figured MTL would only bite if a center was going back.

As for goalies, sure, if Khudobin agrees to come back. I feel like this is his last chance at a starter's position and he might follow the dollar bill and the expanded role. Bernier is far cheaper cap wise than any UFA of similar skill.
I also only moved Fedun because Tampa drastically overpays for meh guys on cheap cap hits. He's really just a replaceable 7th D, so get what you can for him.


Bernier is cheaper only if you retain his salary.

I'd like to keep a goalie that is able to play 30 games a season, with Bishop declining. This is why I'd re-sign Khudobin. I don't see him costing much more than Bernier, maybe around $0.25-0.5M more.

I wouldn't be so optimistic about Brodie going. Nowadays almost all long-term deals include a NTC or NMC, and with expansion draft nearing I can't see many able UFA D-men signing without the clause.

As for Fast, I think keeping Faksa is a better option, because he can play C and he can do that very well. If they drive the same purpose, I think FLA as a team would go after Fast rather than moving probably their 3rd best D... Also doesn't FLA need more offensively skilled 2C over a defensive mid-6 C?
6 avr. 2020 à 0 h 34
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
Quoting: justaBoss
Bernier is cheaper only if you retain his salary.

As for Fast, I think keeping Faksa is a better option, because he can play C and he can do that very well. If they drive the same purpose, I think FLA as a team would go after Fast rather than moving probably their 3rd best D... Also doesn't FLA need more offensively skilled 2C over a defensive mid-6 C?


I think Dallas made him more a defensive guy than he himself was. Florida needs centers over wingers, thus why they wouldn't target Fast. Faksa used in a different system, paired with (say they split the top line) Huberdeau could accelerate his offensive game. If he can reach that, he is both a cheap asset in terms of cap, and the 2C that FLA needs. If not, he is still a very util 3rd liner that benefits Florida's desperate need for defense.
Weegar is a difficult asset to price. I typically ask more for him, but I am also high on Faksa becoming more. I just do not think he has reached his full potential in Dallas.
6 avr. 2020 à 0 h 39
#12
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
Quoting: Wqrrior
I think Dallas made him more a defensive guy than he himself was. Florida needs centers over wingers, thus why they wouldn't target Fast. Faksa used in a different system, paired with (say they split the top line) Huberdeau could accelerate his offensive game. If he can reach that, he is both a cheap asset in terms of cap, and the 2C that FLA needs. If not, he is still a very util 3rd liner that benefits Florida's desperate need for defense.
Weegar is a difficult asset to price. I typically ask more for him, but I am also high on Faksa becoming more. I just do not think he has reached his full potential in Dallas.


I'm a huge fan of Faksa, and I too do believe he hasn't reached his full potential. Every shift on ice he gives it all. Personally, I'd only move him for a first round pick plus something. I'd be so freaking pissed if DAL dealed him somewhere else and he starts to shine offensively, like for example what happened with Danault after he got moved to MTL.

As for Florida's wings, if Hoffman and Dadonov walk, I'd say they still need players in these positions.
6 avr. 2020 à 0 h 44
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
Quoting: justaBoss
I'm a huge fan of Faksa, and I too do believe he hasn't reached his full potential. Every shift on ice he gives it all. Personally, I'd only move him for a first round pick plus something. I'd be so freaking pissed if DAL dealed him somewhere else and he starts to shine offensively, like for example what happened with Danault after he got moved to MTL.

As for Florida's wings, if Hoffman and Dadonov walk, I'd say they still need players in these positions.


Weegar is the defense equivalent of Faksa. Workhorse, statistically great, drastically undervalued. Except Dallas' need at 2RD is much larger than their need for a bottom six center that they can't make work in the top 6.
I mean, look at this team vs. what you have now. Which team is more difficult to play against? Does the trade make your team better?

You raise a fair point about the NMC/NTC, but it's pretty rare that middle of the pack guys get NMCs. Usually NTCs, which don't impact the expansion draft.
6 avr. 2020 à 0 h 58
#14
What in tarnation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 32,708
Mentions "j'aime": 31,448
Quoting: Wqrrior
Weegar is the defense equivalent of Faksa. Workhorse, statistically great, drastically undervalued. Except Dallas' need at 2RD is much larger than their need for a bottom six center that they can't make work in the top 6.
I mean, look at this team vs. what you have now. Which team is more difficult to play against? Does the trade make your team better?

You raise a fair point about the NMC/NTC, but it's pretty rare that middle of the pack guys get NMCs. Usually NTCs, which don't impact the expansion draft.


I do agree that the team is better, but I don't see that teams would do so many trades during one offseason and then acquire free agents to fill up the positions they lost. I don't think that is a realistic standard for any NHL GM to work with. Let's take that MTL trade for example. I can't think of a single example when a NHL team moved a TOP3 D of the team for a 2C (although from what I've caught, apparently Domi isn't that effective on the C position really. He's more of a LW...), and then filled that same roster spot with an UFA D. This formula is used in basically all of these moves, which I find quite unrealistic.

This is the way to build up a team in NHL games.

If we were to forget all other moves but the FLA trade, we do need a 2RD more than Faksa, but we'd also be much more likely to lose Weegar in the expansion draft than Faksa. Faksa fits nicely to the 7 protected forwards, Weegar has hard time fitting to the 3 d-men that'll be protected. Needs fit, situation doesn't.
Wqrrior a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage