SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

ProjectionsPredictionsread descriptions

Créé par: BuckoJoyde
Équipe: 2021-22 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 29 mars 2020
Publié: 29 mars 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I always get ripped in these because I deserve it. That aside, I realize watching the hockey guy we have had two successful decades in a row and I truly believe we will be middle of the pack for time to come unless we get a top 2 pick. Ok, anyways this post is self explanatory in its own way. However, I wanna add if we get Drysdale replace him with Axel or Manson is gone for a couple of 2nd -4th round picks, Raymond replaces Terry/sherwood, and the top three in the upcoming postponed draft are in our top 6 moving everyone down. That said, I realize as a ducks fan despite not having a 2nd Stanley cup I have been spoiled with great hockey for my entire life so far. Nevertheless, I see a down turn for time to come. But let me know your thoughts. Tell if I'm stupid and give me a couple of chirps.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3850 000 $
3850 000 $
3850 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 775 000 $
21 000 000 $
21 800 000 $
1750 000 $
2850 000 $
33 200 000 $
22 200 000 $
21 125 000 $
21 125 000 $
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 550 000 $
1750 000 $
24 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Not predicting the exact year or team but if it were for this years draft he could also get c level prospect including a 20-31 pick. That aside, could see a Kase like deal including Rakell.
2.
ANA
    prospect failure switch.
    3.
    ANA
    1. Wilde, Bode
    2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NYI)
    Détails additionnels:
    Im a little more specific with this trade due to the feeling of the possibility it can happen on his contract year. Nevertheless, I could see Lindholm going east to a playoff contender who's willing to pay a little more to win now. May be way off on the prospect but, it will be b level prospect for sure. Especially, considering this pick could be 25-31 range.
    Rachats de contrats
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2020
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de BOS
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    2021
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    2022
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de ANA
    Logo de NSH
    Logo de ANA
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2381 500 000 $52 751 250 $0 $1 355 000 $28 748 750 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    2 775 000 $2 775 000 $
    AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
    C, AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    863 333 $863 333 $
    AG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
    AG, C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    3 550 000 $3 550 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    850 000 $850 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    822 500 $822 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
    G
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    772 500 $772 500 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Islanders de New York
    764 167 $764 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
    DD
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    822 500 $822 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
    C, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    29 mars 2020 à 19 h 36
    #1
    Cold spaghetti
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2019
    Messages: 4,917
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,134
    I think you could get more for lindholm
    Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
    29 mars 2020 à 19 h 36
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Being wrong is ok
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 703
    Mentions "j'aime": 354
    Forgot to add heinen is lost in the expansion and djoos doesn't sign.
    29 mars 2020 à 19 h 38
    #3
    Démarrer sujet
    Being wrong is ok
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 703
    Mentions "j'aime": 354
    @bunzy1034 if your trading him at his contract year I thinks this what you fetch due to age, injury and offensive capability.
    29 mars 2020 à 19 h 43
    #4
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 33,053
    Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
    Take more then Wilde+1st to get Lindholm.
    aedoran et Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
    29 mars 2020 à 20 h 6
    #5
    Once a Kings Fan Too
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 40,124
    Mentions "j'aime": 25,038
    None of these ideas is terrible or far off the mark. However, there is a danger in trying to look too far into the future. For example, Christian Djoos may re-sign this summer and turn out to be better than Larsson, Guhle or Mahura. Heinen may turn out to be better than one of Jones, Tracey and Lundestrom. I think that a lot depends upon whether we get Stutzle, Raymond, Holtz or Drysdale in the draft. You covered the latter two possibilities but there is the first (however remote).
    29 mars 2020 à 20 h 18
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Being wrong is ok
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 703
    Mentions "j'aime": 354
    @OldNYIfan Djoos is already better than Larsson but I feel hell leave the nhl. Id take Heinen over Jones as of rn. Too much does depends on those mention in the draft but they will be in our line up by then imo. Nevertheless, disagree about the future part. All this team has is the future,
    29 mars 2020 à 20 h 32
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2018
    Messages: 5,138
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,938
    Only way I move Rakell for just a first is if its top 5, if its lower than 10 he gets at least a B prospect too. I like the Idea of moving Larsson/Guhle for a similar RD

    Lindholm gets more than a 1st and a B prospect even in a contract year, hes a top 2 defenseman and those rarely get moved

    I would not go anywhere near that Guddy contract
    OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    29 mars 2020 à 21 h 46
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Being wrong is ok
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 703
    Mentions "j'aime": 354
    @Salzy @AFOX10900 Whats a reasonable trade for Lindholm? btw @Salzy you putting to much value for Rakell imo.
    29 mars 2020 à 22 h 42
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2018
    Messages: 5,138
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,938
    Quoting: Slezzy21
    @Salzy @AFOX10900 Whats a reasonable trade for Lindholm? btw @Salzy you putting to much value for Rakell imo.


    There isnt one in my opinion, at least a reasonable one. I'd want a 1st and an A prospect to start, depending on the range the first is projected add more

    I dont think so, put him with top 6 quality line mates and hes a 60 pt player on a good deal for 2 seasons, a first and a B prospect is very reasonable seeing the returns some guys have gotten lately, might even be an undersell
    Dan10900 a aimé ceci.
    29 mars 2020 à 23 h 3
    #10
    Démarrer sujet
    Being wrong is ok
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 703
    Mentions "j'aime": 354
    @Salzy So you'd rather resign Lindholm at what exactly? do you want pay him 8 mill plus? Lets not have assurance he'll sign a team friendly deal and how often to teams trade A level prospects? I can't personally name one. Sounds like bad assets management. That said yes Rakell could get 60 on a good team but this isn't guaranteed and I foresee a downfall for him especially since he's scored over 60 points once in his career.
    29 mars 2020 à 23 h 22
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: nov. 2018
    Messages: 5,138
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,938
    Quoting: Slezzy21
    @Salzy So you'd rather resign Lindholm at what exactly? do you want pay him 8 mill plus? Lets not have assurance he'll sign a team friendly deal and how often to teams trade A level prospects? I can't personally name one. Sounds like bad assets management. That said yes Rakell could get 60 on a good team but this isn't guaranteed and I foresee a downfall for him especially since he's scored over 60 points once in his career.


    I’d sign Lindholm along the lines of 8 year up to 7.5 aav, I can’t see him asking for more than that tbh I don’t think he’s earned an 8x8 and he’s my favourite player on the Ducks, now let’s say he comes out and asks for north of 8 I would 100% be on board moving him

    Teams move A prospects more frequently than teams move top pair DMen I feel like, could be wrong though, depends on the return to call anything bad asset management and with prospects you could be waiting 10+ years to say it was a bad move or not
    29 mars 2020 à 23 h 37
    #12
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 7,261
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
    Quoting: Slezzy21
    Whats a reasonable trade for Lindholm?


    None. You don't trade Lindholm, just like in CAR you don't trade Dougie Hamilton (unless it's for each other... Who could hang up faster... Probably CAR/Tulsky, but you get my point) the minimum I'd take (I'm just using PIT bc I know them the best, not bc it makes any sense) is John Marino (high end 2 RD his rookie year)+Poulin+2021 first+(later pick or spec like Almeida due to it not being a 2020 first)
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage