Forums/Fauteuil - DG

Cap relief

Créé par: Pharow
Date de création initiale: mar 27, 2020
Publié: Mar 27 at 1:43 pm
Équipe: 2020-21 Canucks de Vancouver
Explications
Vancouver have already one players who need to be protect for Seattle expansion draft in Ferland. I guess that Miller, Pettersson, Boeser, Horvat, Gaudette would also be protect so that leave one spot for Toffoli that why they have sacrifice Virtanen. They get rid of Eriksson contract and use that money to land Robin Lehner.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANNÉESCAP HIT
Gaudette, Adam22 500 000 $
Stecher, Troy22 500 000 $
Brisebois, Guillaume2800 000 $
UFAANNÉESCAP HIT
Lehner, Robin67 000 000 $
Toffoli, Tyler65 500 000 $
Leivo, Josh22 000 000 $
DeMelo, Dylan33 000 000 $
Transactions
VAN
  1. 2020 3e round pick (WSH)
MTL
  1. Virtanen, Jake [Droits de RFA]
  2. Eriksson, Loui
Rachats de contrats
  • Ryan Spooner: 1 033 333 $
Frais appliqués
  • Roberto Luongo: 3 033 206 $
Enfoui
  • Sven Baertschi: 2 291 666 $ (3 366 666 $)
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
2020
VAN
WSH
VAN
VAN
VAN
ANA
2021
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
2022
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS BONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $80 799 872 $0 $3 700 000 $700 128 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
VAN
Miller, J.T.
5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 3
VAN
Pettersson, Elias
925 000 $
C
RFA - 1
VAN
Toffoli, Tyler
5 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
VAN
Pearson, Tanner
3 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
VAN
Horvat, Bo
5 500 000 $
C
UFA - 3
VAN
Boeser, Brock
5 875 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
VAN
Ferland, Micheal
3 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
VAN
Gaudette, Adam
2 500 000 $
C
RFA
VAN
Sutter, Brandon
4 375 000 $
AD, C
NTC
UFA - 1
VAN
Roussel, Antoine
3 000 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 2
VAN
Beagle, Jay
3 000 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 2
VAN
Leivo, Josh
2 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
VAN
Hughes, Quinn
916 667 $
DG
RFA - 1
DeMelo, Dylan
3 000 000 $
DD
UFA
Lehner, Robin
7 000 000 $
G
UFA
VAN
Edler, Alexander
6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
VAN
Myers, Tyler
6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 4
VAN
Demko, Thatcher
1 050 000 $
G
RFA - 1
VAN
Benn, Jordie
2 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
VAN
Stecher, Troy
2 500 000 $
DD
RFA
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
VAN
Brisebois, Guillaume
800 000 $
DG
RFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 mar à 13 h 48
#1
Banni
Rejoint: fév 2020
Messages: 437
Mentions "j'aime": 138
Why would Montreal do this?
27 mar à 13 h 54
#2
Démarrer sujet
Team caaaannnaaada
Rejoint: jun 2019
Messages: 4,914
Mentions "j'aime": 1,411
Quoting: Leafsfan34
Why would Montreal do this?


They have space under the cap and they get a young forward in Virtanen. Just like they did with Armia last time.
27 mar à 13 h 55
#3
Banni
Rejoint: fév 2020
Messages: 437
Mentions "j'aime": 138
Quoting: Sebybbq
They have space under the cap and they get a young forward in Virtanen. Just like they did with Armia last time.


But why Eriksson? They would could sign someone like Hall
27 mar à 14 h 03
#4
its in the game
Rejoint: jun 2016
Messages: 155
Mentions "j'aime": 16
Quoting: Leafsfan34
But why Eriksson? They would could sign someone like Hall


Last year, Montreal had trouble attracting free agents. I could see a move like this happening if they fail again this season.
GM has to make an effort to improve his team, one way or another.
Pharow a aimé ceci.
27 mar à 14 h 22
#5
Master of NHL trades
Rejoint: fév 2019
Messages: 1,389
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Quoting: Sebybbq
They have space under the cap and they get a young forward in Virtanen. Just like they did with Armia last time.


Ferland doesn't have to be protected in expansion so it's a no for me for this trade. Would Montreal be interested in Joulevi by any chance? If so if you take him straight up without Eriksson what would you give up?
27 mar à 14 h 37
#6
Démarrer sujet
Team caaaannnaaada
Rejoint: jun 2019
Messages: 4,914
Mentions "j'aime": 1,411
Quoting: GMmaster13
Ferland doesn't have to be protected in expansion so it's a no for me for this trade. Would Montreal be interested in Joulevi by any chance? If so if you take him straight up without Eriksson what would you give up?

Ferland have a NMC so yes he have to be protected. https://www.capfriendly.com/expansion-draft-faq.

Montreal have already three lefthanded defenseman prospect that are highly ranked So no Montreal would be looking at young winger or prospect winger. The other option would be Adam Gaudette. If Not Montreal could probably take a lesser contract in Sutter or Roussel or Beagle and would ask for Lind or Gadjovich as prospect coming back
27 mar à 14 h 40
#7
Master of NHL trades
Rejoint: fév 2019
Messages: 1,389
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Quoting: Sebybbq
Ferland have a NMC so yes he have to be protected. https://www.capfriendly.com/expansion-draft-faq.

Montreal have already three lefthanded defenseman prospect that are highly ranked So no Montreal would be looking at young winger or prospect winger. The other option would be Adam Gaudette. If Not Montreal could probably take a lesser contract in Sutter or Roussel or Beagle and would ask for Lind or Gadjovich as prospect coming back


Dude Ferland's NMC ends before the expansion draft so no he doesn't have to be protected. What would you say however to a trade of Sutter and Lind for Montreal's own 3rd?
27 mar à 15 h 02
#8
Démarrer sujet
Team caaaannnaaada
Rejoint: jun 2019
Messages: 4,914
Mentions "j'aime": 1,411
Quoting: GMmaster13
Dude Ferland's NMC ends before the expansion draft so no he doesn't have to be protected. What would you say however to a trade of Sutter and Lind for Montreal's own 3rd?


Actually it end after the expansion draft since the draft is made before the draft weekend prospect selection. The rules makes it clear that if a players have a NMC at the moment of the draft must accept to waive is clause. This is from Nhl.com
‘’ All players with no movement clauses at the time of the draft, and who decline to waive those clauses, must be protected and will be counted toward their team's applicable protection limits.’’
Some players where in similar position last time, and it’s probably the main reason he had a NMC clause in is contract to cover expansion draft.
27 mar à 15 h 07
#9
Démarrer sujet
Team caaaannnaaada
Rejoint: jun 2019
Messages: 4,914
Mentions "j'aime": 1,411
Quoting: GMmaster13
Dude Ferland's NMC ends before the expansion draft so no he doesn't have to be protected. What would you say however to a trade of Sutter and Lind for Montreal's own 3rd?


And no if Montreal take Sutter and Lind the pick is still the one own by Washington (85th-90th). If Vancouver become to hungry Montreal will turn themselves to another team who need to free up space under the cap.
27 mar à 22 h 57
#10
Rejoint: jun 2017
Messages: 476
Mentions "j'aime": 74
Why sign Lehner when you have Marky already especially when Marky might be less money, not by much tho
27 mar à 23 h 06
#11
Démarrer sujet
Team caaaannnaaada
Rejoint: jun 2019
Messages: 4,914
Mentions "j'aime": 1,411
Quoting: Booyah
Why sign Lehner when you have Marky already especially when Marky might be less money, not by much tho


Because Lehner is a better goalie and he is younger.
28 mar à 8 h 27
#12
Rejoint: jun 2017
Messages: 476
Mentions "j'aime": 74
We are hoping Demko or DiPietro turns into a starter though as well i am sure the Canucks are thinking about that already
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Supprimer une option
Soumettre le sondage