SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

flat cap

Créé par: Jfstompers
Équipe: 2020-21 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 25 mars 2020
Publié: 27 mars 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 250 000 $
33 500 000 $
43 500 000 $
2800 000 $
1850 000 $
1900 000 $
1900 000 $
2850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
56 750 000 $
11 000 000 $
32 750 000 $
12 000 000 $
Transactions
BOS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (DET)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de DET
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $80 323 981 $964 222 $107 500 $1 176 019 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
769 167 $769 167 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 498 925 $1 498 925 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
DG
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 mars 2020 à 10 h 15
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Modifié 27 mars 2020 à 10 h 21
This is pretty much Perfect!
Chara will take less, and Moore can get you a 4th.
and arguably Debrusk and Griz can get a little more (for these bridge deals I would say closer to 4 mil)

BUTTTTT, This is really really good!

Any way to get Dell at a shorter term? Bruins got a few good young goalies coming up.
27 mars 2020 à 10 h 20
#2
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,147
Mentions "j'aime": 6,988
This is pretty good. Nothing exciting, but that’s probably where the bruins are at. I would just say flip Krejci and Coyle, and figure out a different back up situation. No interest in dell, and i feel like that price tag is a high high end back up goalie.
27 mars 2020 à 10 h 22
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,578
Mentions "j'aime": 5,454
Why re-sign Ritchie???
27 mars 2020 à 10 h 23
#4
Bcarlo25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 21,147
Mentions "j'aime": 6,988
Quoting: bhavikp27
Why re-sign Ritchie???


Missed that. Holy crap, ditch that signing.
27 mars 2020 à 10 h 36
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Quoting: bhavikp27
Why re-sign Ritchie???


Why not? He aint making any other roster, might as well give him a two-way deal and see if he can smarten up training with his brother
27 mars 2020 à 10 h 38
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Quoting: bhavikp27
Why re-sign Ritchie???


Quoting: Bcarlo25
Missed that. Holy crap, ditch that signing.


Not to mention he is an RFA so there is not loss in offering him a deal. If someone offers him a one-way deal, bruins just dont match.
27 mars 2020 à 10 h 53
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
one could make the argument DeBrusk cracks 30 goals his second year if he plays all 82 games.
I think he gets more than that because he has potential to output more.

Chara on the other hand. I don't see why he comes back or why Boston brings him back.
He's done as a player. He's too slow to keep up.
27 mars 2020 à 10 h 55
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,578
Mentions "j'aime": 5,454
Quoting: bsilk18
Why not? He aint making any other roster, might as well give him a two-way deal and see if he can smarten up training with his brother


Quoting: bsilk18
Not to mention he is an RFA so there is not loss in offering him a deal. If someone offers him a one-way deal, bruins just dont match.


First, I don't know if you watch Bruins games or did watch Ritchie.

He is useless. He can't skate. Out of position or can't keep it up with his teammates. The game in WSH was a " Ritchie type game ", a physical game. He did NOTHING. He is probably a good person but play at NHL level, he can't.

" He aint making any other roster " So why would the best team in the league sign him??

Anyways, Bruins won't re-sign him so I can live in peace
27 mars 2020 à 10 h 58
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,578
Mentions "j'aime": 5,454
Quoting: pharrow
one could make the argument DeBrusk cracks 30 goals his second year if he plays all 82 games.
I think he gets more than that because he has potential to output more.

Chara on the other hand. I don't see why he comes back or why Boston brings him back.
He's done as a player. He's too slow to keep up.


That was last year. He can get 30, we know but he hasn't yet. On pace for 24 this year. Biggest problem this year is that he's been inconsistent and that sucks, but for his contract, Bruins could get him for less because of that. Yes, I would prefer to see him with 30G and pay him but that's not the case, currently.

Chara, because he wants to come back and he can still play well defensively
27 mars 2020 à 11 h 6
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: bhavikp27
That was last year. He can get 30, we know but he hasn't yet. On pace for 24 this year. Biggest problem this year is that he's been inconsistent and that sucks, but for his contract, Bruins could get him for less because of that. Yes, I would prefer to see him with 30G and pay him but that's not the case, currently.

Chara, because he wants to come back and he can still play well defensively


Chara can't play well defensively, he is constantly beat to the puck in a dump in. They relied heavily on the other defense man to grab the puck when it enters in the zone on his side.
He can't move. Teams know he can't they constantly attack him when dumping it in, that was show cased last year in the playoffs, it won't be any different now. He's 43, he should hang it up if not Boston should show him the door. He does more harm than good now. Putting him out there is basically going 5 on 4.

As for DeBrusk, most young players are inconsistent. But he's shown enough that he can get there. He'll get paid for it. Guys with 30 goal potential make more than guys with 20 goal potential.
That contract above is for a guy with 20 goal potential.
27 mars 2020 à 11 h 11
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,028
Mentions "j'aime": 7,744
Why not re-sign Halak?
27 mars 2020 à 11 h 19
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,578
Mentions "j'aime": 5,454
Quoting: pharrow
Chara can't play well defensively, he is constantly beat to the puck in a dump in. They relied heavily on the other defense man to grab the puck when it enters in the zone on his side.
He can't move. Teams know he can't they constantly attack him when dumping it in, that was show cased last year in the playoffs, it won't be any different now. He's 43, he should hang it up if not Boston should show him the door. He does more harm than good now. Putting him out there is basically going 5 on 4.

As for DeBrusk, most young players are inconsistent. But he's shown enough that he can get there. He'll get paid for it. Guys with 30 goal potential make more than guys with 20 goal potential.
That contract above is for a guy with 20 goal potential.


It's a bridge deal for DeBrusk.


Disagree for Chara. He is still effective on the PK and when defending a lead. Dump in, it's normal, opponents are faster.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage