SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Bruins go all in for next season

Créé par: braisman
Équipe: 2020-21 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 26 mars 2020
Publié: 26 mars 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Hopefully Chara takes a 1 mill base salary with a easily attainable bonus. Give Krug 8 years in order to keep the cap hit lower. Obviously this deal will not age well, but the core window is closing and our prospect system is bad too. We can rebuild in 3-4 years. Hopefully Hall takes slightly less money for max term and the best chance to win.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
11 200 000 $
22 850 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
87 250 000 $
78 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (CBJ)
2.
BOS
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (COL)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
SJS
  1. Grzelcyk, Matt [Droits de RFA]
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de BOS
Logo de COL
Logo de BOS
Logo de CBJ
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2021
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de SJS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $82 048 981 $964 222 $425 000 $-548 981 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
UFA - 3
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 600 000 $2 600 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 498 925 $1 498 925 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 mars 2020 à 19 h 50
#1
Jeuck75
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 4,076
Mentions "j'aime": 1,600
If Hall signs with the Bruins, all the other NHL teams should just pack up and go home.
Leafsfan34 a aimé ceci.
26 mars 2020 à 19 h 50
#2
Jeuck75
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 4,076
Mentions "j'aime": 1,600
Quoting: Jeuck75
If Hall signs with the Bruins, all the other NHL teams should just pack up and go home.


They will be SO GOOD
Leafsfan34 a aimé ceci.
26 mars 2020 à 20 h 3
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 437
Mentions "j'aime": 138
Quoting: Jeuck75
They will be SO GOOD


Tampa bay should just sell all their prospects and go sicko mode.
But Boston isn't beating St. Louis again
Jeuck75 a aimé ceci.
26 mars 2020 à 20 h 11
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,496
Mentions "j'aime": 4,562
You lost me when you say Boston prospect pool was bad.
Silkysmooth42 a aimé ceci.
26 mars 2020 à 20 h 12
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,565
Mentions "j'aime": 5,450
Quoting: Leafsfan34
Tampa bay should just sell all their prospects and go sicko mode.
But Boston isn't beating St. Louis again


If they got refs again and Berube got his goons, yes otherwise no chance for STL
Silkysmooth42 a aimé ceci.
26 mars 2020 à 20 h 17
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,565
Mentions "j'aime": 5,450
It would be so stupid to sign Hall

Would be so good to have DeBrusk at that price but he probably gets a bit more

Moore's worth less, Grzelcyk more

Krug probably gets 5-6Y
26 mars 2020 à 20 h 37
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Why are the sharks giving you a second and a third for a meh bottom pairing D?
26 mars 2020 à 20 h 37
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: ON3M4N
You lost me when you say Boston prospect pool was bad.


Its one of the worst in the league and has only gotten worse this year. Why do you think its good?
Salzy a aimé ceci.
26 mars 2020 à 20 h 38
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: ON3M4N
You lost me when you say Boston prospect pool was bad.


Bruins prospect pool ranked 29th pre-season (https://theathletic.com/1125088/2019/09/05/pronman-2019-20-nhl-farm-system-rankings/) and 30th in January (https://theathletic.com/1464556/2020/01/14/wheelers-2020-nhl-prospect-pool-rankings-no-30-boston-bruins/) . Don't think you're going to find anyone who has legitimately scouted the Boston system to say it's above the bottom 3rd of the league...
Salzy et Klara a aimé ceci.
26 mars 2020 à 20 h 50
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 437
Mentions "j'aime": 138
Quoting: bhavikp27
If they got refs again and Berube got his goons, yes otherwise no chance for STL


There are no good refs in the playoffs. The playoffs have different rules
26 mars 2020 à 20 h 54
#11
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Quoting: ON3M4N
You lost me when you say Boston prospect pool was bad.


People dont believe the bruins prospect pool is as good as it is.
I agree with you, but have you seen some of the rankings? Bruins are at like 27+ on most of them.
Im with you that its wrong, but people seem to think otherwise frown
26 mars 2020 à 20 h 55
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,496
Mentions "j'aime": 4,562
Quoting: Sagecoll
Bruins prospect pool ranked 29th pre-season (https://theathletic.com/1125088/2019/09/05/pronman-2019-20-nhl-farm-system-rankings/) and 30th in January (https://theathletic.com/1464556/2020/01/14/wheelers-2020-nhl-prospect-pool-rankings-no-30-boston-bruins/) . Don't think you're going to find anyone who has legitimately scouted the Boston system to say it's above the bottom 3rd of the league...


Haha I don't give a flying f#*& what those things say. The Athletic isn't worth what it cost and 95% of ther content is garbage.
Silkysmooth42 et MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
26 mars 2020 à 20 h 56
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: ON3M4N
Haha I don't give a flying f#*& what those things say. The Athletic isn't worth what it cost and 95% of ther content is garbage.


That's so funny because most of us had the same thought about your opinions lol.
Teemu_salami et Klara a aimé ceci.
26 mars 2020 à 20 h 56
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Quoting: Sagecoll
Bruins prospect pool ranked 29th pre-season (https://theathletic.com/1125088/2019/09/05/pronman-2019-20-nhl-farm-system-rankings/) and 30th in January (https://theathletic.com/1464556/2020/01/14/wheelers-2020-nhl-prospect-pool-rankings-no-30-boston-bruins/) . Don't think you're going to find anyone who has legitimately scouted the Boston system to say it's above the bottom 3rd of the league...


Yeah i have seen these rankings too and i poitned it out.
Its pretty sad that people are underestimating the bruins prospects that much, but reguardless, the truth is that the bruins have a deep and strong prospect pool. No A level talents, but B level prospects and plentiful
26 mars 2020 à 20 h 57
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,496
Mentions "j'aime": 4,562
Quoting: papishark
Its one of the worst in the league and has only gotten worse this year. Why do you think its good?


It ranks low because most of their top (what should be) prospect are in the NHL already contributing.
Silkysmooth42, bhavikp27 et McGruff a aimé ceci.
26 mars 2020 à 20 h 58
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 4,561
Mentions "j'aime": 1,266
Quoting: Sagecoll
That's so funny because most of us had the same thought about your opinions lol.


No ... @ON3M4N is right here .. Bruins have a severly underrated prospect pool. Not to mention the Athletic hates Boston lol, they constantly have anti-bruins articles
26 mars 2020 à 20 h 58
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,496
Mentions "j'aime": 4,562
Quoting: papishark
Why are the sharks giving you a second and a third for a meh bottom pairing D?


This right here proves you know nothing about the Bruins system or its players. Grz would be a top 4 on a good amount of teams, but is behind Krug & Chara.
26 mars 2020 à 20 h 59
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: ON3M4N
It ranks low because most of their top (what should be) prospect are in the NHL already contributing.


Yeah then those arent prospects anymore. Those are young players
26 mars 2020 à 21 h 0
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 8,796
Mentions "j'aime": 3,226
Quoting: ON3M4N
This right here proves you know nothing about the Bruins system or its players. Grz would be a top 4 on a good amount of teams, but is behind Krug & Chara.


He wouldnt be on the sharks, so thats really all I need to know. If hes great and cheap theres no need for you to trade him
26 mars 2020 à 21 h 1
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,496
Mentions "j'aime": 4,562
Quoting: Sagecoll
That's so funny because most of us had the same thought about your opinions lol.


Feel free to add me to your ignore list then because your going on mine. A few interactions with you is enough for me to know you don't offer much to a hockey conversation.

cheers
26 mars 2020 à 21 h 3
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,496
Mentions "j'aime": 4,562
Quoting: papishark
Yeah then those arent prospects anymore. Those are young players


I'll take good young NHL players over being highly ranked in some half baked prospect analysis any day.
26 mars 2020 à 21 h 4
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,728
Mentions "j'aime": 1,559
Quoting: bsilk18
Yeah i have seen these rankings too and i poitned it out.
Its pretty sad that people are underestimating the bruins prospects that much, but reguardless, the truth is that the bruins have a deep and strong prospect pool. No A level talents, but B level prospects and plentiful


Stud is an A prospect. I'd say it's mostly C prospects with a few B's, but all those B's had mediocre years. Beecher had a sub par year in NCAA, Lauko missed half the year and Vaakanainen didn't do much offensively this year at all. Steen also had a mediocre year in the AHL. And those are basically the top Boston prospects. After that, you're looking at a handful of guys with 3rd pair or 4th line ceilings...
papishark a aimé ceci.
26 mars 2020 à 21 h 4
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 11,496
Mentions "j'aime": 4,562
Quoting: papishark
He wouldnt be on the sharks, so thats really all I need to know. If hes great and cheap theres no need for you to trade him


I wouldn't trade him
26 mars 2020 à 21 h 25
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 1,723
Mentions "j'aime": 535
Quoting: Sagecoll
Stud is an A prospect. I'd say it's mostly C prospects with a few B's, but all those B's had mediocre years. Beecher had a sub par year in NCAA, Lauko missed half the year and Vaakanainen didn't do much offensively this year at all. Steen also had a mediocre year in the AHL. And those are basically the top Boston prospects. After that, you're looking at a handful of guys with 3rd pair or 4th line ceilings...


well theres ur first problem, ur only looking at stats
bhavikp27 et ON3M4N a aimé ceci.
26 mars 2020 à 21 h 30
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,565
Mentions "j'aime": 5,450
Quoting: Sagecoll
Stud is an A prospect. I'd say it's mostly C prospects with a few B's, but all those B's had mediocre years. Beecher had a sub par year in NCAA, Lauko missed half the year and Vaakanainen didn't do much offensively this year at all. Steen also had a mediocre year in the AHL. And those are basically the top Boston prospects. After that, you're looking at a handful of guys with 3rd pair or 4th line ceilings...


Beecher: Wasn't playing top minutes, yet he was 3rd in pts/GP among forwards
Lauko: first pro season, mostly had a bottom-6 role and suffered injury at WJC
Vaakanainen: He is NOT going to be an offensive dman. He is more defensive and is in his second year in the AHL
Steen: also limited to a bottom-6 role but started playing C around January and adjusting his game


And this:
Quoting: ON3M4N
It ranks low because most of their top (what should be) prospect are in the NHL already contributing.
Silkysmooth42 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage