SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Giving as little assets

Créé par: Iraniel
Équipe: 2020-21 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 26 mars 2020
Publié: 26 mars 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2700 000 $
2700 000 $
2700 000 $
11 500 000 $
22 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1700 000 $
1700 000 $
43 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Savard, David (750 000 $ retained)
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (NYR)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (BUF)
3.
TOR
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (WPG)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de WPG
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de NYR
Logo de SJS
Logo de BUF
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $78 072 283 $0 $400 000 $3 427 717 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
821 667 $821 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
312 500 $312 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 650 000 $1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 mars 2020 à 9 h 55
#1
GM Hockeysaurus Rex
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 14,152
Mentions "j'aime": 5,738
Giving up three top-9 forwards and top-4 D is a little too much for "giving as little assets"
26 mars 2020 à 9 h 56
#2
cash$$
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 119
Mentions "j'aime": 37
I don't get why Columbus would trade Savard, Tortorella loves him so that doesn't make much sense and Kerfoot's value is not on par with Savard's he is a 3C Savard is a top 4 defenseman doesn't match. Also why would you trade Kerfoot, then sign Haula to replace him costing you more money. Doesn't that defeat the purpose? The defense still sucks (Even with Savard), and the forward group keeps thinning out every year.
26 mars 2020 à 10 h 2
#3
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 26
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Quoting: SammyT_51
Giving up three top-9 forwards and top-4 D is a little too much for "giving as little assets"


Wait. Giving up a top 9 defenseman (when we already have the ohls leading goal scorer) is giving up to much. Dermott is not a top 4 d man. Kerfoot hasn't been great this year. Envall ever since he signed that contract has been bad
26 mars 2020 à 11 h 4
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
CBJ declines. Engvall isn't being traded. Haula has injury issues the past two years and is going to be 30. He's played 60 some games the last 2 years combined. Why would anyone give him a big contract. I'd be hesitant about that.
26 mars 2020 à 11 h 6
#5
Démarrer sujet
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 26
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Quoting: pharrow
CBJ declines. Engvall isn't being traded. Haula has injury issues the past two years and is going to be 30. He's played 60 some games the last 2 years combined. Why would anyone give him a big contract. I'd be hesitant about that.


Why would Columbus decline. Engvall has sucked ever since signing that contract.
26 mars 2020 à 11 h 41
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 19,215
Mentions "j'aime": 4,837
Quoting: Iraniel
Why would Columbus decline. Engvall has sucked ever since signing that contract.


Because Kerfoot doesn't solve any issues for CBJ. He's a 3C at best. That doesn't help CBJ. Why would they give up a top 4 defenseman for a 3C at best when they have guys who can fill that role.
If CBJ ever brings in a C it's a guy who is a legitimate 2C.
Ajp_18 a aimé ceci.
26 mars 2020 à 11 h 58
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,379
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: Iraniel
Wait. Giving up a top 9 defenseman (when we already have the ohls leading goal scorer) is giving up to much. Dermott is not a top 4 d man. Kerfoot hasn't been great this year. Envall ever since he signed that contract has been bad


Why is Dermott not a top 4 defenseman? He is a lot younger than people seem to realize and is improving. I'd rather have an RFA Dermott than a pending UFA Savard.

Savard is not all that much better than Dermott today, and I'm fairly confident Dermott will be better within 18 months when Dermott will be 24 or almost 25 and Savard will be 31....
26 mars 2020 à 12 h 11
#8
Kings v5 GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 4,767
Mentions "j'aime": 1,625
Haula isnt very good
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage