SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What does he do

Créé par: HatterTParty
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 23 mars 2020
Publié: 23 mars 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
So, since the buyout idea is gaining traction and looks like a real possibility, I wanna ask the question. Who do the hawks buyout?

Now, many hawks will obviously throw out the easy answer of seabrook. Only thing I will bring up, is bowman. We are stuck with bowman and Colliton for another year. It was suggested to me coaching carousels in sports are always a bad thing. A third coach in a over two years is understandable, just not when you stretch it to third coach in over a decade. If it doesn’t work it doesn’t work. I digress, back to bowman. Bowman is a man who is all about loyalty. Not a bad trait, just not a great tool in business, cuz that’s what hockey is. If seabrook stayed on LTIR, does bowman use the buyout on him? How bout if he ever plays again? Just a thought.

My opinion, I do think it’s used on seabrook. Seabrook will always be a legend in the history of this team, but his decline has been remarkable.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2781 500 000 $72 514 186 $0 $7 797 500 $8 985 814 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
880 833 $880 833 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 mars 2020 à 15 h 20
#1
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,592
Mentions "j'aime": 9,667
Modifié 23 mars 2020 à 15 h 27
Good Post. Good thoughts. If we're going to buyout someone, I'd suggest Zach Smith. $2M less this upcoming season year for an extra $1M worse the following??? Not terrible. Shaw, let's see what he wants to do for...really just his life situation. I'd understand if he wants to hang 'em up. I do think that would allow him to be LTIR'd. If Hossa's skin condition is allowable, continued concussions would be too...I'm guessing. DeHaan, similar situation. When he was on the ice, he was a solid contributor and I'd love to have him back if healthy.

You're 100% correct that Seabs is the real question. It's not a huge help (Cap Wise) to buy him out. Year over year the relief is $300k, $3.3M, $300k, $1.8M...Only $300k next year vs just playing him. I think the Hawks are going to keep riding him until his body fully breaks down. Then try to move his LTIR contract. I don't think they can move him now and Stan will likely be to afraid to trade away the pieces required because of Turbo/Bickell. Bickell just went to LTIR anyway. The other reason I think they go this route is because Seabs has been vocal that he still thinks he can play. Ok, go out and play your heart out. At least for this upcoming season. Then see what situation we're in next summer.
HatterTParty a aimé ceci.
23 mars 2020 à 15 h 39
#2
Drumman44
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 695
Mentions "j'aime": 259
If you get a compliance buyout opportunity and you don't buyout Seabrook for whatever reason, Stan needs to be on the phone with other teams to see if he can take on a bad deal to buyout in exchange for picks / prospects. Don't waste it on Smith
HatterTParty et exo2769 a aimé ceci.
23 mars 2020 à 15 h 44
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: exo2769
Good Post. Good thoughts. If we're going to buyout someone, I'd suggest Zach Smith. $2M less this upcoming season year for an extra $1M worse the following??? Not terrible. Shaw, let's see what he wants to do for...really just his life situation. I'd understand if he wants to hang 'em up. I do think that would allow him to be LTIR'd. If Hossa's skin condition is allowable, continued concussions would be too...I'm guessing. DeHaan, similar situation. When he was on the ice, he was a solid contributor and I'd love to have him back if healthy.

You're 100% correct that Seabs is the real question. It's not a huge help (Cap Wise) to buy him out. Year over year the relief is $300k, $3.3M, $300k, $1.8M...Only $300k next year vs just playing him. I think the Hawks are going to keep riding him until his body fully breaks down. Then try to move his LTIR contract. I don't think they can move him now and Stan will likely be to afraid to trade away the pieces required because of Turbo/Bickell. Bickell just went to LTIR anyway. The other reason I think they go this route is because Seabs has been vocal that he still thinks he can play. Ok, go out and play your heart out. At least for this upcoming season. Then see what situation we're in next summer.


Quoting: DrumMan44
If you get a compliance buyout opportunity and you don't buyout Seabrook for whatever reason, Stan needs to be on the phone with other teams to see if he can take on a bad deal to buyout in exchange for picks / prospects. Don't waste it on Smith


I actually was gonna point this out. Exo, it’s not a regular buyout, it’s a compliance buyout that’s being proposed. I’m really sorry, I actually realized that I didn’t make that clear in the first line of the subject. I don’t if that changes your answer, I just noticed you mentioned cap savings. So I wasn’t sure if I made clear it was a compliance buyout.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
23 mars 2020 à 16 h 52
#4
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,592
Mentions "j'aime": 9,667
Quoting: HatterTParty
I actually was gonna point this out. Exo, it’s not a regular buyout, it’s a compliance buyout that’s being proposed. I’m really sorry, I actually realized that I didn’t make that clear in the first line of the subject. I don’t if that changes your answer, I just noticed you mentioned cap savings. So I wasn’t sure if I made clear it was a compliance buyout.


Oh, then yeah for sure 100% agreed!

I thought that ship passed though? Did the NHL put something out recently? Both the NHLPA and NHL agreed to NOT opt out by the Sept 1st 2019 deadline...meaning the CBA is good until 2022. Are they close to a new CBA for longer than 2022? All this stuff with the virus may throw a few curveballs into what players/owners want in the CBA?
23 mars 2020 à 16 h 57
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: exo2769
Oh, then yeah for sure 100% agreed!

I thought that ship passed though? Did the NHL put something out recently? Both the NHLPA and NHL agreed to NOT opt out by the Sept 1st 2019 deadline...meaning the CBA is good until 2022. Are they close to a new CBA for longer than 2022? All this stuff with the virus may throw a few curveballs into what players/owners want in the CBA?


That’s the general consensus. The CBA has nothing to do it, it’s all about the outbreak. There’s a thought that the cap will actually drop, if not just stay at 81.5. If that’s the case, it alters every team’s expectation as to handling their caps. Contracts that were signed last summer and this season were signed expecting the cap to go up. So yea, the NHL and the PA may agree that it’s mutually beneficial for all teams to get a compliance buyout for next year.
exo2769 a aimé ceci.
23 mars 2020 à 17 h 0
#6
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,592
Mentions "j'aime": 9,667
Quoting: HatterTParty
That’s the general consensus. The CBA has nothing to do it, it’s all about the outbreak. There’s a thought that the cap will actually drop, if not just stay at 81.5. If that’s the case, it alters every team’s expectation as to handling their caps. Contracts that were signed last summer and this season were signed expecting the cap to go up. So yea, the NHL and the PA may agree that it’s mutually beneficial for all teams to get a compliance buyout for next year.


Oh wow! Thanks for sharing.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage