SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lineup options if and when playoffs begin

Créé par: Pens3lieve
Équipe: 2019-20 Penguins de Pittsburgh
Date de création initiale: 20 mars 2020
Publié: 20 mars 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This team has only been healthy for approximately two periods ALL SEASON LONG. Therefore the full potential has never been seen, although that December-January run was pretty good record wise.
With the huge caveat “if fully healthy”, how would you set up the lines if the playoffs started with no more season play ed.

I would:
16-87-43/9(Sid likes Sheary and I’d rather have that than Simon who should be banished from sids line for the rest of his career and play in the cold dark basement of the 3rd line. I’d also like to give Erod a shot up there but playoffs might not be the best time to do that.
59-71-17 (this was one of the most dominant lines in hockey this year.)
12/18-27/19-72
46-53-13(aka buzzsaw)

Some different line ideas.
18-27-72 was really dominant but had no finish.
19-27-72 seemed to be their attempt to improve on that.
43-87-18(o o please no!!! No Sid no!!!) twitter would crash and burn if that happened.

You could stack the top 6:
59/16-87-17
59/16-71-72

18-27-9(For the analytics geeks as all three have had good corsi years.)
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
2021
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
Logo de PIT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $77 282 875 $132 500 $982 500 $4 217 125 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
767 500 $767 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
874 125 $874 125 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
833 750 $833 750 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 mars 2020 à 17 h 12
#1
Hockey IQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 3,000
Mentions "j'aime": 1,481
Sidstick87 a aimé ceci.
20 mars 2020 à 17 h 21
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 5,011
Mentions "j'aime": 1,636


For me:

16-87-43/18
59-71-17
19-9-72
46-53-13

8-58
28-6
50-4

I am a big Sheary fan but IMO he is the weakest Forward on the team. Good play driver but doesn’t get enough production to amuse me. If he plays, he’s gotta be playing with Sid cuz that’s the only place I see him being useful at. Otherwise scratch him.

Gotta keep the ZAR-Blueger-Tanev line together. They are an amazing shutdown energy line. Jake-Geno-Rust is a given for me, though could swap Zucker & Jake from time to time. I envision Zucker with his speed & forechecking would help create lots of space for Geno to dangle.
20 mars 2020 à 18 h 13
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 15,921
Mentions "j'aime": 6,980
If pens are FULLY healthy and playing to their expectations (this includes bjustad picking up where he left off last year and Being a good 3C, id do)

Zucker-Crosby-Sheary
Jake-Geno-Rust
McCann-Jugs-Horny
ZAR-Blueger-Tanev

I know people may not like the scratching of Marleau, but I just don’t see a fit for him IF Jugs returns to form. I also would rather not break up the 4th line. However, some other bottom 6 combos I could see:

Marleau/simon-McCann-Hornqvist
ZAR-Jugs/Bjustad-Tanev
21 mars 2020 à 3 h 40
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 3,012
Mentions "j'aime": 350
Quoting: MitchMarnerElite
For me:

16-87-43/18
59-71-17
19-9-72
46-53-13

8-58
28-6
50-4

I am a big Sheary fan but IMO he is the weakest Forward on the team. Good play driver but doesn’t get enough production to amuse me. If he plays, he’s gotta be playing with Sid cuz that’s the only place I see him being useful at. Otherwise scratch him.

Gotta keep the ZAR-Blueger-Tanev line together. They are an amazing shutdown energy line. Jake-Geno-Rust is a given for me, though could swap Zucker & Jake from time to time. I envision Zucker with his speed & forechecking would help create lots of space for Geno to dangle.


I agree with all of what he said but if I had to break up guentzel, Geno and rust..and honestly I think this makes for the best possible 3rd line without really affecting the top two lines

Guentzel Crosby simon
Zucker Malkin rust
Sheary mccann Hornqvist
Reese bleuger tanev
21 mars 2020 à 9 h 20
#5
Démarrer sujet
Hockey IQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 3,000
Mentions "j'aime": 1,481
Quoting: MajesticWalrus
I agree with all of what he said but if I had to break up guentzel, Geno and rust..and honestly I think this makes for the best possible 3rd line without really affecting the top two lines

Guentzel Crosby simon
Zucker Malkin rust
Sheary mccann Hornqvist
Reese bleuger tanev


Those lines are balanced for sure. I see Simon there as well but I wish I didn’t. If Shearys not great Marleau or Erod can step in for him. Zucker hasn’t ever played with Geno but I get giving sid Guentzel.
21 mars 2020 à 11 h 18
#6
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 5,011
Mentions "j'aime": 1,636
Quoting: MajesticWalrus
I agree with all of what he said but if I had to break up guentzel, Geno and rust..and honestly I think this makes for the best possible 3rd line without really affecting the top two lines

Guentzel Crosby simon
Zucker Malkin rust
Sheary mccann Hornqvist
Reese bleuger tanev


I was thinking could also try Jake-Sid-McCann. They were really good during their brief time together last season.
mhockey91 et Pens3lieve a aimé ceci.
21 mars 2020 à 13 h 14
#7
Hockey God Genius
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 3,261
Mentions "j'aime": 811


- Like I said at deadline, we should have moved Kahun + 2nd Rdr + whatever else needed to get a "real" top 6 guy... Instead of Sheary, Marleau, E-Rod
I would go....
59-87-16
19-71-17
12-27-72
13-53-43/18/9

But Imagine.....
59-87-Rakell/ Fiala/ Domi/ Palmieri/ LaBanc/ Kappy/ Trocheck/ Tatar (1 of them)
16-71-17
19-27-72
13-53-18/9/46

* That would be a Legit 4- Lines w/ a powerful Top 6 for a Stanley Cup
mhockey91 et Pens3lieve a aimé ceci.
21 mars 2020 à 14 h 30
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 5,011
Mentions "j'aime": 1,636
Quoting: Sidstick87
- Like I said at deadline, we should have moved Kahun + 2nd Rdr + whatever else needed to get a "real" top 6 guy... Instead of Sheary, Marleau, E-Rod
I would go....
59-87-16
19-71-17
12-27-72
13-53-43/18/9

But Imagine.....
59-87-Rakell/ Fiala/ Domi/ Palmieri/ LaBanc/ Kappy/ Trocheck/ Tatar (1 of them)
16-71-17
19-27-72
13-53-18/9/46

* That would be a Legit 4- Lines w/ a powerful Top 6 for a Stanley Cup


Yeah I agree they should’ve gone after Rakell or Fiala instead of Sheary. Especially if they were give up Kahun.
Sidstick87 et Pens3lieve a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage