SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TBL 20-21

Créé par: JTBF81
Équipe: 2020-21 Lightning de Tampa Bay
Date de création initiale: 11 mars 2020
Publié: 14 mars 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Trades are just for values I believe Tampa will try and get, not that these will be the teams necessarily.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Stephens, Mitchell
1900 000 $
Sergachev, Mikhail
34 750 000 $
Gaunce, Cameron
1700 000 $
Cirelli, Anthony
34 250 000 $
Verhaeghe, Carter
1800 000 $
Rutta, Jan
21 450 000 $
Cernak, Erik
22 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
TBL
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (ANA)
ANA
  1. Paquette, Cédric
Détails additionnels:
Anaheim is not necessarily the team, but a 3rd/4th is what Tampa will be looking for in this trade.
2.
TBL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (DAL)
DAL
  1. Killorn, Alex
Détails additionnels:
Wherever he is traded, Tampa will aim for a 2021 1st but could end up with a 2nd+3rd or b prospect, all depends on how many teams are interested.
3.
TBL
ANA
  1. Coburn, Braydon
Détails additionnels:
Really Tampa will be looking for just a late pick anywhere and will likely add a pick as well. If Coburn won't waive the ntc then there's a buyout, waivers or even maybe ltir as possibilities to free some space.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de PHI
Logo de ANA
Logo de TBL
Logo de DET
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
2021
Logo de TBL
Logo de DAL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de NSH
Logo de NJD
2022
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
Logo de TBL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2185 000 000 $84 900 924 $0 $500 000 $99 076 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Cirelli, Anthony
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
5 166 666 $5 166 666 $
C, AG, AD
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
759 258 $759 258 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Stephens, Mitchell
900 000 $900 000 $
Verhaeghe, Carter
800 000 $800 000 $
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Rutta, Jan
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
G
UFA - 8
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 6
Cernak, Erik
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
DD
RFA - 1
Sergachev, Mikhail
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
Gaunce, Cameron
700 000 $700 000 $

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 mars 2020 à 14 h 30
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 553
Trades are just for values I think Tampa will aim for, not that these will be the teams. This model has an 85 million cap, since most think it will be 84-86, went in the middle. This is a rough estimate of how Tampa could look next year, and those of us that know how the Lightning get things done with contracts will know the numbers are reasonable. Depending on where the cap ends up will determine what tweaks are made but this is a definite possibility of how the bolts could look next year. Some possible changes would be if Maroon wants to sign another 1 year team friendly deal and Tampa wants him back, maybe Bogosian as the rotating Dman and perhaps Volkov or Joseph instead of ABB. Of course if JBB convinces one of Gourde,TJ or Palat to waive, then they take the place of Killorn, but that seems unlikely atm. Obviously whatever the virus does to impact things long term can't be known yet, but still hopeful on a roster similar to this one. As far as specific players, Sergachev at 4.75 on a 3 year bridge is quite reasonable given McAvoy got 4.9 and Werenski took 5 on their bridge deals. Tampa gets their players to usually take a little less, so this number seems about right. Cirelli at 4.25 is right in line with what other young Tampa F that were performing at similar levels took on their 1st non elc based on % of cap. I could see Cirelli up to 4.5 but around 5% of the cap is the ballpark for his bridge. Cernak has been solid but has also shown more than a few times that he's still a 2nd year player here. 2 or 3 years at 2 max but closer to 1.75 is completely reasonable. If Tampa has to lose an rfa than it's def Cernak, but I believe he will want to stay with Tampa. JBB has to be thinking 11 max between the 3 of them, and it wouldn't surprise me or several others I've talked to if it's closer to 10 if these 3 come in even a few hundred k lower on their deals. I know this is a 21 player roster but it's just a rough estimate, when the numbers come in potentially a little lower on a couple players a 22nd player could be added. In any case, Tampa made 22 work fine for much of this season so whether it's 21 or 22, Tampa should be fine. Obviously this off season won't be easy but it's far from some worst case, everybody's going to take an offer sheet(lol) scenario so many on here seem to think it is.
14 mars 2020 à 15 h 28
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 4,422
Mentions "j'aime": 1,457
Killorn ain't getting you a first
14 mars 2020 à 15 h 40
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 441
Mentions "j'aime": 159
Teams aren’t going to be making fair offers to Tampa. Everyone knows their cap hell and will only help for a big return in their direction.
14 mars 2020 à 16 h 55
#4
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 15,911
Mentions "j'aime": 8,565
Don't know if you don't realize but if you go to "Sign/Offer Sheet RFAs" and then click team and press "Tampa Bay Lightning", you can sign all your RFAs
JTBF81 a aimé ceci.
14 mars 2020 à 17 h 0
#5
GO BOLTS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,406
Mentions "j'aime": 388
Coburn trade Tb will need to add a prospect or pick.
14 mars 2020 à 17 h 0
#6
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,646
Mentions "j'aime": 12,369
Still can't believe BriseBois gave Foote and two 1sts for Coleman and Goodrow... Lol
14 mars 2020 à 17 h 32
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 553
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
Still can't believe BriseBois gave Foote and two 1sts for Coleman and Goodrow... Lol


For someone who doesn't understand the Lightning's position, I get why'd you believe that. For those that do, it is 3 possible impact players 3 or 4 years from now minimum vs 2 players that make them that much better now. Tampa overpaid but that's what it often takes for cost controlled assets with term that were each wanted by several teams according to most reports.
14 mars 2020 à 17 h 40
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 553
Quoting: Hockeytor15
Killorn ain't getting you a first


We will see, he was on pace for 30 goals and near 60 points, solid 2 way player on a good value contract. Tampa may not get a 1st depending on how many teams are interested from his trade list but it wouldn't surprise me if he did. He will at minimum return 2nd+solid prospect or 2nd+2nd/3rd type deal, there will be interest.
14 mars 2020 à 17 h 41
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 553
Quoting: jasalex
Coburn trade Tb will need to add a prospect or pick.


That could be very likely, I mentioned it in the trade details. I can't see him on the roster next year though.
14 mars 2020 à 17 h 43
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 553
Quoting: MaxDomi13
Don't know if you don't realize but if you go to "Sign/Offer Sheet RFAs" and then click team and press "Tampa Bay Lightning", you can sign all your RFAs


Thank you for the info!
14 mars 2020 à 17 h 45
#11
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 15,911
Mentions "j'aime": 8,565
Quoting: JTBF81
Thank you for the info!


no problem
14 mars 2020 à 18 h 0
#12
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,646
Mentions "j'aime": 12,369
Quoting: JTBF81
For someone who doesn't understand the Lightning's position, I get why'd you believe that. For those that do, it is 3 possible impact players 3 or 4 years from now minimum vs 2 players that make them that much better now. Tampa overpaid but that's what it often takes for cost controlled assets with term that were each wanted by several teams according to most reports.


I'm aware of Tampa's position, they were too massive overpays for depth players that aren't gonna make that much difference.
14 mars 2020 à 19 h 58
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,499
Mentions "j'aime": 553
Quoting: MisstheWhalers
I'm aware of Tampa's position, they were too massive overpays for depth players that aren't gonna make that much difference.


Clearly you don't and sure they won't, guess you know that based on 9 whole games so far, wow! I'll wait to see how they do if and/or when they finish this year, and oh that's right, all of next season at least as well, since they weren't rentals. These 2 also help a cap stretched team remain very competitive and help replace 2 guys that will be moved. Both have already looked solid ffg or what Tampa wanted them for, and Coleman is likely to tally some real points here once the timing gets a little better between him and his new linemates imo. Goodrow has been a pest on the 4th line and has added both toughness and some offensive ability there. Tampa fans are mostly fine with the trades as the window is now and 2 later 1sts have no great guarantee to even pan out. Foote looks to be a player who could have a decent career, but he wouldn't have made the team until, best case scenario, 21-22 and likely not until 22-23. For a rebuilding team like the devils it's also a good trade and same for the Sharks. Tampa had to outbid Colorado, Boston and at least one other team for Coleman, and pretty sure Boston and one other team was interested in Goodrow as well. It's like multiple contending teams knew getting low cost players with term are valuable or something... So yes, Tampa overpaid, dont really care, I'd much rather have these guys for hopefully 2 cup runs(and maybe more) and hopefully at least one Cup win then seeing them on teams that Tampa could very well have to defeat to get there.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage