SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

EVO GAR team

Créé par: AnalyticalGM
Équipe: 2019-20 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 10 mars 2020
Publié: 10 mars 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Top 20 skaters EVO GAR via EvolvingHockey

Players are ranked by position including LD/RD
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $120 707 690 $0 $5 350 000 $-39 207 690 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 634 000 $11 634 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Predators de Nashville
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 8
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
10 mars 2020 à 13 h 38
#1
tony d took a knee
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 220
Mentions "j'aime": 50
hamilton being in there after missing nearly 2 months now is funny
Caniac2000 a aimé ceci.
10 mars 2020 à 13 h 47
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,571
Mentions "j'aime": 6,715
Ok i'm not going to pretend to understand every advanced analytic out there as my knowledge is still pretty basic but can someone explain to me the minutia of what I'm look at here?
10 mars 2020 à 13 h 59
#3
torontos finest
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,560
Mentions "j'aime": 11,191
Quoting: F50marco
Ok i'm not going to pretend to understand every advanced analytic out there as my knowledge is still pretty basic but can someone explain to me the minutia of what I'm look at here?


a list of players
10 mars 2020 à 14 h 1
#4
Démarrer sujet
AA21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 346
Mentions "j'aime": 204
Quoting: F50marco
Ok i'm not going to pretend to understand every advanced analytic out there as my knowledge is still pretty basic but can someone explain to me the minutia of what I'm look at here?


EVO - Even-strength offense. EVO is a dimension of GAR.
GAR stands for goals above replacement, which is a measurement of a players goal contributions relative to a replacement-level player. Replacement-level players are average replacement options like low price FAs or AHL call-ups. Positive GAR players are better goal contributors than players with a negative GAR.

So basically, the more positive GAR rating the harder the player is to replace in the lineup. Panarin leads all skaters with +16.4
10 mars 2020 à 14 h 9
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,571
Mentions "j'aime": 6,715
Quoting: AnalyticalGM
EVO - Even-strength offense. EVO is a dimension of GAR.
GAR stands for goals above replacement, which is a measurement of a players goal contributions relative to a replacement-level player. Replacement-level players are average replacement options like low price FAs or AHL call-ups. Positive GAR players are better goal contributors than players with a negative GAR.

So basically, the more positive GAR rating the harder the player is to replace in the lineup. Panarin leads all skaters with +16.4


Hmm ok interesting. So I can pretty much right away get the nature of the stat by simply looking at the players on the list like Panarin, McDavid, Josi etc. Players I would expect to have a higher positive GAR rating.

What does this mean for the less obvious guys like McCann and Shattenkirk for example? Are they products of their environment more than they are actual so irreplaceable to be among the others on this list?
10 mars 2020 à 14 h 9
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,571
Mentions "j'aime": 6,715
Quoting: mondo
a list of players


applaud
10 mars 2020 à 14 h 34
#7
Démarrer sujet
AA21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 346
Mentions "j'aime": 204
Quoting: F50marco
Hmm ok interesting. So I can pretty much right away get the nature of the stat by simply looking at the players on the list like Panarin, McDavid, Josi etc. Players I would expect to have a higher positive GAR rating.

What does this mean for the less obvious guys like McCann and Shattenkirk for example? Are they products of their environment more than they are actual so irreplaceable to be among the others on this list?


Even strength offence takes into consideration certain drivers of value such as scoring and shot generation, while taking into account shot quality, competition and and teammates.
McCann and Shattenkirk being in the top 20 skaters displays their ability to generate offence at even strength at an elite level. However, limited TOI could be a reason these two are rated so high. I would imagine if McCann was playing 17+ minutes a night his GAR rating would drop.
10 mars 2020 à 14 h 59
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,571
Mentions "j'aime": 6,715
Quoting: AnalyticalGM
Even strength offence takes into consideration certain drivers of value such as scoring and shot generation, while taking into account shot quality, competition and and teammates.
McCann and Shattenkirk being in the top 20 skaters displays their ability to generate offence at even strength at an elite level. However, limited TOI could be a reason these two are rated so high. I would imagine if McCann was playing 17+ minutes a night his GAR rating would drop.


Ok thanks that is kind of what I was thinking. Curious what was the minimum requirement for this list?
10 mars 2020 à 15 h 4
#9
Démarrer sujet
AA21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 346
Mentions "j'aime": 204
Quoting: F50marco
Ok thanks that is kind of what I was thinking. Curious what was the minimum requirement for this list?


100 mins TOI
10 mars 2020 à 16 h 10
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 19,571
Mentions "j'aime": 6,715
Quoting: AnalyticalGM
100 mins TOI


Ok that's barely nothing, I imagine every one of these guys is way higher than that anyway. Either way doesn't change anything.

This is where I'm confused by this stat though, McCann has less minutes than most guys on here true but not by a TON. 850 EV mins vs lets say Marchand/Pettersson at 975. Yet his EV points is significantly less than those two. So how can a guy like McCann be so high in GAR? Maybe Im missing something? Maybe the GAR difference between those guys and McCann is a lot but McCann just happens to be within the top 20 as a statistical anomaly? Is he the outlier maybe?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage