SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sorry to break it to everyone but Escrow

Créé par: papishark
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 6 mars 2020
Publié: 6 mars 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
54 000 000 $
1800 000 $
1800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
11 000 000 $
33 000 000 $
Transactions
TBL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (TBL)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 500 000 $74 948 333 $0 $430 000 $8 551 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
836 667 $836 667 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 mars 2020 à 12 h 40
#1
Billy739
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 6,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
i tried explaining this before and people insist its not a big deal.
its one of those topics nobody will get for like a decade then pretend they got it all along
yikes et papishark a aimé ceci.
6 mars 2020 à 12 h 50
#2
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,059
Mentions "j'aime": 12,817
Quoting: Billy739
i tried explaining this before and people insist its not a big deal.
its one of those topics nobody will get for like a decade then pretend they got it all along

It’s so sus, you lose to taxes and then throw it on top.

Definitely needs to he reworked
Billy739 a aimé ceci.
6 mars 2020 à 13 h 10
#3
Billy739
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 6,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
Quoting: yikes
It’s so sus, you lose to taxes and then throw it on top.

Definitely needs to he reworked


Agreed
To me a teams owner shouldnt withhold and gamble with players money just because they want to spend all their cap on 1-2 contract .

I mean for your NHL entry level or league minimum salaries they're only losing up to 150k which is a lot but its before taxes so not a crushing blow.
With NHL players like Toews he's losing just over 1.5m a year to Escrow which is why he's been Vocal in his displeasure of Escrow.
yikes a aimé ceci.
6 mars 2020 à 13 h 22
#4
EklundCelebriniSmith
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,059
Mentions "j'aime": 12,817
Quoting: Billy739
Agreed
To me a teams owner shouldnt withhold and gamble with players money just because they want to spend all their cap on 1-2 contract .

I mean for your NHL entry level or league minimum salaries they're only losing up to 150k which is a lot but its before taxes so not a crushing blow.
With NHL players like Toews he's losing just over 1.5m a year to Escrow which is why he's been Vocal in his displeasure of Escrow.


And the variety of it can change. It should be like a flat percentage. Like all teams take ; 11% let’s just say (random number) that way it’s fair and your still getting a alot total back from the contracts where as the leafs escrow is probably like 10$Mil from their main 4-5 guys let alone the rest of the team brings that way higher.
Billy739 a aimé ceci.
6 mars 2020 à 13 h 34
#5
Billy739
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 6,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
Quoting: yikes
And the variety of it can change. It should be like a flat percentage. Like all teams take ; 11% let’s just say (random number) that way it’s fair and your still getting a alot total back from the contracts where as the leafs escrow is probably like 10$Mil from their main 4-5 guys let alone the rest of the team brings that way higher.


to me its best to change the 50/50 split to 47.5/47.5 with a 5% base taken out and held for 5 years before being returned to both sides .
that 5% when not used for 5 years consecutively should then revert back to the 50/50 format with no Escrow
The Interest gained from the 5% sitting in for any number of those 5 years would then be taken into a seperate account
That account containing the Interest would collect its own interest over time creating a secure fund indeffinately .

it would be like a 20 year process but it eliminates the problem with a plan to get back to 50/50 without Escrow .
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage