SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

85 mil cap

Équipe: 2020-21 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 4 mars 2020
Publié: 4 mars 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
CHI currently sits at 13 mil of cap space. I think they can free some by moving De Haam to a team in need of defense, like Florida for a mid pick or two.

Now, CHI still has veterans in need of help. I'm thinking about Corey Crawford and Duncan Keith. Keith has been of the 5 best d-men of the late 2000s and the 2010s(until 2019 ish). Keith is still a great skater who can play up to 22 minutes a game, but he can't play in a 1st pairing role anymore. That's a fact. As for Crawford, I like him, but a 35 and with his recent injuries, I think adding a goalie should be one of, if not the main priority of CHI. I know Hawks fans like to talk about Delia, but he has little to no NHL experience so it's not safe to say that he's capable of playing 25-30 games as soon as next season. He could, but it isn't likely.

I think Jonas Brodin would be the best fit possible in CHI to address their previously stated weakness. And CHI has Dylan Strome who is a young, talented center, exactly what the desperately needs. I'll explain the trade in the trade itself.

Now, how to solve the problem? I think the solution (and I say that as a NYR fan) would have to be Georgiev. I'll have to speak as a NYR for that matter. He's not even 25. He's still getting better. He kept us in games that we honestly shouldn't have been in this season. He's stolen AT LEAST 5 games, maybe even 7 for us this season. And he's done it while facing 28+ shots per game. Of course since Shestyorkin has been called up he's played less, but over the past few games he's been great. He makes mistakes but he's able to fix them by making a great save.

Now, who could the Hawks move for him? I think Nylander would/could be a nice start. Now, since he'll likely become a 25 ish goals scorer, I think the NYR should add in that trade... a 2021 3rd rounder + 2020 5th rounder maybe? With that, the Hawks get their future starter.


Now, why would I trade 2 young forwards for players older than them?

A couple of reasons:
1-the acquisitions of Brodin and Georgiev solve specific needs within the Hawks roster
2-with Raymond being drafted and Kurashev being the player he is (he's amazing, believe me I've watched him at least 25 times in Qc City).










Hawks fans, what do you think about that? Any good points? Any bad points? The few signings (Namestnikov and Eakin)?
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3850 000 $
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 750 000 $
34 750 000 $
2900 000 $
2975 000 $
1700 000 $
22 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
13 750 000 $
12 500 000 $
12 750 000 $
1900 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Raymond, Lucas
3925 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (COL)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2021 (FLA)
FLA
  1. De Haan, Calvin (1 250 000 $ retained)
2.
CHI
  1. Brodin, Jonas
Détails additionnels:
CHI gets a d-man entering his prime who can contribute to the offense, be great in a defensive role while playing 25 ish minutes per game.


Add picks if necessary.
MIN
  1. Strome, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
MIN gets a top 6 center who can pass the puck while still scoring 20-25 ish goals per season.

Add picks if necessary.
3.
CHI
  1. Georgiev, Alexandar [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2020 (NYR)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (NYR)
NYR
  1. Nylander, Alexander
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (CHI)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de COL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
Logo de FLA
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2485 000 000 $75 231 098 $1 090 244 $3 350 000 $9 768 902 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 3
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD, C
UFA - 2
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
900 000 $900 000 $
AG
UFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
4 166 667 $4 166 667 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4

Unités spéciales

Avantage numérique 1
Avantage numérique 2
Infériorité numérique 1
 
Infériorité numérique 2
 

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 mars 2020 à 16 h 34
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,519
Mentions "j'aime": 656
I really like the Brodin and Georgiev acquisitions, fills two crucial holes on the roster with guys who are still young.

Couple quick things though - Seabrook is slated to be back in time for training camp, so we can't write off his cap hit yet. We can probably do without Eakin/Namestnikov and fill those roles from within or with cheaper options. Also, Maatta's buyout is cheaper than the retention on De Haan, who is the better defenseman anyway, so I'd rather have De Haan on the bottom pair.
4 mars 2020 à 16 h 36
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,222
Mentions "j'aime": 2,162
For the most part I think its pretty good. Ive been back and forth on trading Strome, also think the Oilers for Nurse would be a target cuz he and McDavid have that Junior connection. I never really thought about Namestnikov but if we trade strome it definitely makes sense, but I dont think we sign both him and Eakin, probably one or the other. We have Evan Barratt probably wanting to come up from Penn State so id probably give him a chance over Schaller and I think Shalunov comes over from the KHL as well. Definitely a lot of options here and I think that Georgiev trade is interesting for sure, definitely would give Delia and Lankinen some competition and an already proven NHL goalie. Also think Carlsson stays up and plays over Seeler and I think if the cap goes up enough Ottawa would be interested in taking back Smith as a locker room guy but that doesn't move the needle on this thread too much. Overall definitely good insight and I dont think anything here really is far from reality other than small nitpicky things
4 mars 2020 à 18 h 9
#3
Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,630
Mentions "j'aime": 1,651
This is very good, and I really like the trades however I want to think that it's a poor trade on behalf of NYR. Nylander hasn't shown too much in his first full NHL season. He has room to grow and in the right situation he could very well develop and turn into a solid player but I'm not sold on that happening. I would also say Nylander has been bounced around the lineup so much I'm sure it's hard to create chemistry because after 2 great games with Kane he'll be placed on a 4th line role with Kampf and Carpenter and play like 10 min a game. Hard to put up 20 goals and 50 points playing that little. That being said, I'd say the NYR trade is an overpayment on the New York side.

I'd agree I'm not sure hawks need Eakin and or Namestnikov. There are 2 bottom six positions that may open up that could be used by Entwistle, Barratt, or Kurashev (unclear if any will be ready for full time NHL next season) but all three projected to be bottom 6 players. Plus Shalunov is gaining traction. I'd agree with @SlickWilly that we could probably use our own system players for cheaper and that Seabrook I'd project to be in the lineup next year.

Long winded and Idk if I made much sense or not lol.
4 mars 2020 à 18 h 42
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,222
Mentions "j'aime": 2,162
Quoting: Jco5ta5
This is very good, and I really like the trades however I want to think that it's a poor trade on behalf of NYR. Nylander hasn't shown too much in his first full NHL season. He has room to grow and in the right situation he could very well develop and turn into a solid player but I'm not sold on that happening. I would also say Nylander has been bounced around the lineup so much I'm sure it's hard to create chemistry because after 2 great games with Kane he'll be placed on a 4th line role with Kampf and Carpenter and play like 10 min a game. Hard to put up 20 goals and 50 points playing that little. That being said, I'd say the NYR trade is an overpayment on the New York side.

I'd agree I'm not sure hawks need Eakin and or Namestnikov. There are 2 bottom six positions that may open up that could be used by Entwistle, Barratt, or Kurashev (unclear if any will be ready for full time NHL next season) but all three projected to be bottom 6 players. Plus Shalunov is gaining traction. I'd agree with @SlickWilly that we could probably use our own system players for cheaper and that Seabrook I'd project to be in the lineup next year.

Long winded and Idk if I made much sense or not lol.


Completely forgot about Entwistle tbh but I think he definitely gets a shot next year
4 mars 2020 à 19 h 31
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
I actually think your concept is not bad.

I would probably keep Strome, not sign Eakin and then trade Maatta and keep Koekkoek with Mitchell on the bottom pairing with Carlsson, Gilbert etc as the 7-8. Oh and yes Seabrook will be around also so he can be there for Locker room presence and be in the mix with Carlsson and Gilbert as the 7-8. particularly when we might drop Mitchell to Rockford when the NHL starts to take its toll.

Namestnikov makes sense and we will also be drafting a winger in the first round, hopefully Holtz so will really round out our wings nicely with Kurashev, Entwistle and Barrett all vying for positions in the bottom 6 next year. A little healthy competition is nice amongst the lineup.

Overall I like the concept.
5 mars 2020 à 0 h 49
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,991
Mentions "j'aime": 9,300
Looking up front, I think Highmore has earned a spot and have to consider Hagel, maybe Kurashev and don't think we should give up on Nylander quite yet. Also would move or buyout Maatta and keep DeHaan.

Interesting proposition on Brodin, but given he's a pure rental it would be a bad move IMO based on value, Minnesota would need to add. Nurse from Edmonton is a better option.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage