SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The hunt for depth

Créé par: Wqrrior
Équipe: 2020-21 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 4 mars 2020
Publié: 4 mars 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
12 750 000 $
22 650 000 $
21 300 000 $
2800 000 $
2825 000 $
43 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
44 150 000 $
23 500 000 $
1950 000 $
21 950 000 $
Transactions
1.
NJD
  1. Lucic, Milan (750 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (CGY)
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2021 (CGY)
2.
CGY
  1. Anderson, Josh [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. Bennett, Sam
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
If Bennett has more or equal points to Anderson after 2021, the picks are not exchanged
3.
CGY
  1. Ehn, Christoffer [Droits de RFA]
DET
  1. Jankowski, Mark [Droits de RFA]
4.
CGY
  1. Lafferty, Sam [Droits de RFA]
  2. McCann, Jared [Droits de RFA]
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de SJS
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2021
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2022
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $74 826 666 $0 $457 500 $8 673 334 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
UFA
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 125 000 $3 125 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
825 000 $825 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 375 000 $3 375 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 375 000 $1 375 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 1
1 950 000 $1 950 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
950 000 $950 000 $
DD
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
4 mars 2020 à 2 h 45
#1
Frolik Deez Nutz
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 426
Mentions "j'aime": 46
So instead of having Lucic on the roster and counting as 5.25M against the cap. Flames are giving up a 2nd and retaining 750k on Lucic, while putting Schneider in the minors for the next 2 years?

Essentially have a goalie in the minors counting as 5.65M(4.9M+750k) against the cap for another 2 years vs a roster player at 5.25M for 2/3 years(Lucic contract is structured where he'll likely retire over playing that final season).

Tre would be out the door pretty fast after that one lol
4 mars 2020 à 3 h 14
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
Pens don’t need another LHD. Would prefer Andersson
4 mars 2020 à 3 h 22
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 852
Mentions "j'aime": 194
Quoting: DerpNation
So instead of having Lucic on the roster and counting as 5.25M against the cap. Flames are giving up a 2nd and retaining 750k on Lucic, while putting Schneider in the minors for the next 2 years?

Essentially have a goalie in the minors counting as 5.65M(4.9M+750k) against the cap for another 2 years vs a roster player at 5.25M for 2/3 years(Lucic contract is structured where he'll likely retire over playing that final season).

Tre would be out the door pretty fast after that one lol



I love the Lucic trade, I’m so glad a Calgary fan can finally admit how garbage he is. Just awesome how after the trade Eric Francis and the other homers were calling it a win for Calgary
4 mars 2020 à 9 h 30
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,127
Mentions "j'aime": 448
Quoting: DerpNation
So instead of having Lucic on the roster and counting as 5.25M against the cap. Flames are giving up a 2nd and retaining 750k on Lucic, while putting Schneider in the minors for the next 2 years?

Essentially have a goalie in the minors counting as 5.65M(4.9M+750k) against the cap for another 2 years vs a roster player at 5.25M for 2/3 years(Lucic contract is structured where he'll likely retire over playing that final season).

Tre would be out the door pretty fast after that one lol


Quiet, you're going to blow it for us. DEVILS ACCEPT.
4 mars 2020 à 10 h 4
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 6,449
Mentions "j'aime": 2,962
Still not interested in Bennett as the primary return for Anderson. Anderson has done more at the NHL level than Bennett ever did.
4 mars 2020 à 13 h 37
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
Quoting: Scoob1978
Quiet, you're going to blow it for us. DEVILS ACCEPT.


Quoting: DerpNation
So instead of having Lucic on the roster and counting as 5.25M against the cap. Flames are giving up a 2nd and retaining 750k on Lucic, while putting Schneider in the minors for the next 2 years?

Essentially have a goalie in the minors counting as 5.65M(4.9M+750k) against the cap for another 2 years vs a roster player at 5.25M for 2/3 years(Lucic contract is structured where he'll likely retire over playing that final season).

Tre would be out the door pretty fast after that one lol


It's the price you have to pay for the last year of the contract to be gone. Schneider is 2 years, Lucic is 3. A 2nd is the approximate cost of the salary difference.
4 mars 2020 à 16 h 4
#7
Frolik Deez Nutz
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 426
Mentions "j'aime": 46
Quoting: Wqrrior
It's the price you have to pay for the last year of the contract to be gone. Schneider is 2 years, Lucic is 3. A 2nd is the approximate cost of the salary difference.


Quoting: Wqrrior
It's the price you have to pay for the last year of the contract to be gone. Schneider is 2 years, Lucic is 3. A 2nd is the approximate cost of the salary difference.


The price you have to pay is a higher cap hit for 2 years instead of 3 for a player that wont even be playing plus a 2nd and a 7th?

With the final year of Lucic's contract set to see him play his last season for just 1M out of the 42M, and the fact he's already mentioned this year that he contemplated retirement. Tre would have to be an idiot to make that trade.
6 mars 2020 à 14 h 13
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 146
Mentions "j'aime": 30
Quoting: Pensfan89
Pens don’t need another LHD. Would prefer Andersson


Of course the pens would prefer Andersson lol hes a far superior player
Wqrrior a aimé ceci.
6 mars 2020 à 14 h 25
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 1,440
Quoting: NeverEndingMisery
Of course the pens would prefer Andersson lol hes a far superior player


He is also a RHD signed with term. It would be worth paying more for him than it would be trading for Kylington. Typically when you make trades, they will typically be what both teams need.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage