SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

If Sharks never traded away Hoffman and got Karlsson

Créé par: Klara
Équipe: 2019-20 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 2 mars 2020
Publié: 2 mars 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
All of these trades go back to if the Karlsson and Hoffman trades never happened. This is obviously not exactly what the team would look like at this point. There is a logjam to hell of LW and C while the D is still pretty meh on the 3rd, but without a doubt this team would be a top contender.

A lot of these prospect trades are just to track down where all of the picks went and who they became.

The Goodrow, Braun, and Dillon trades likely don't happen (at least how they are now) if this is the team in 19-20.

Jones and Dell are still there but keep in mind that after the 16-17 offseason, they were both really good and worth their contracts.

All with 3.3m in cap space.

Please let me know if I missed something so I can change it.

This is just meant to show what the team would be if these trades never happened (and no other trades happened instead)
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Balcers, Rūdolfs
  2. Norris, Joshua
  3. Tierney, Chris
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (SJS)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
Détails additionnels:
Also 2nd 2019, Demelo
OTT
  1. Karlsson, Erik
Détails additionnels:
Francis Perron
2.
SJS
  1. DeMelo, Dylan
Détails additionnels:
sent in Karlsson trade
WPG
3.
SJS
  1. Rees, Jamieson [Liste de réserve]
Détails additionnels:
Picked with the other 2nd sharks sent in Karlsson trade
CAR
4.
SJS
  1. Gorniak, Jack [Liste de réserve]
Détails additionnels:
Mikael Hakkarainen (who was then traded to CHI)
MTL
  1. Weatherby, Jasper [Liste de réserve]
Détails additionnels:
Yes this trade did happen, wow
5.
CHI
    Tracked down from Draft pick trade going to back to Hoffman trade
    6.
    SJS
    1. Hoffman, Mike
    2. Kinnunen, Santtu [Liste de réserve]
    FLA
    1. Hakkarainen, Mikael
    Détails additionnels:
    Jamieson Rees
    Jack Gorniak
    7.
    WSH
    1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (COL)
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2021 (WSH)
    8.
    SJS
      claimed off waivers
      9.
      SJS
      1. Goodrow, Barclay
      2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (PHI)
      TBL
      1. Greco, Anthony
      2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (TBL)
      10.
      PHI
      1. Kniazev, Artemi
      2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2020 (PHI)
      Détails additionnels:
      Knaizev essentially became that 2019 2nd.
      Rachats de contrats
      Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2020
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de OTT
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de WSH
      2021
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      2022
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      Logo de SJS
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2281 500 000 $72 471 584 $660 750 $557 500 $9 028 416 $

      Formation

      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
      AG, AD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
      C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 8
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
      C
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      2 937 500 $2 937 500 $
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Panthers de la Floride
      5 187 500 $5 187 500 $
      AG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
      C
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      AD, C
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
      759 167 $759 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      C, AG
      NMC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
      925 000 $925 000 $
      C, AG
      UFA - 2
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Capitals de Washington
      1 635 000 $1 635 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      5 280 000 $5 280 000 $
      DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
      G
      M-NTC
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
      DG/DD
      NMC
      UFA - 7
      Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
      3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      675 000 $675 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
      900 000 $900 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      960 000 $960 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Sharks de San Jose
      1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      2 mars 2020 à 12 h 0
      #1
      EklundCelebriniSmith
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2019
      Messages: 10,057
      Mentions "j'aime": 12,816
      Lines need some work it looks like.
      Hindsight’s always 20/20 so it’s not fair but it’s a fun idea and a good looking team (unfortunately).
      2 mars 2020 à 12 h 3
      #2
      Démarrer sujet
      Bad Take Bot v1.02
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2019
      Messages: 2,683
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,879
      Quoting: yikes
      Lines need some work it looks like.
      Hindsight’s always 20/20 so it’s not fair but it’s a fun idea and a good looking team (unfortunately).


      ya there isn't really a way to make ALL of the pieces work together (which is why a lot of them were traded).
      2 mars 2020 à 12 h 5
      #3
      EklundCelebriniSmith
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2019
      Messages: 10,057
      Mentions "j'aime": 12,816
      Quoting: Klara
      ya there isn't really a way to make ALL of the pieces work together (which is why a lot of them were traded).


      I really want tierney back out of all of this, I’m happy for Norris and think he fits well in Ottawa but I just want cobra back
      2 mars 2020 à 12 h 22
      #4
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2017
      Messages: 910
      Mentions "j'aime": 208
      Justin Braun would still be a Shark though...I thought he was traded due to the re-signing of Karlsson?
      2 mars 2020 à 12 h 43
      #5
      EklundCelebriniSmith
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: sept. 2019
      Messages: 10,057
      Mentions "j'aime": 12,816
      Quoting: awatt
      Justin Braun would still be a Shark though...I thought he was traded due to the re-signing of Karlsson?

      I think it’s Whether you keep Demelo or braun playing. I thought the same thing you thought but then probably Demelo taking a spot ends up making us trade braun anyways

      Edit

      Nvm we have heed in, yes we should have braun just realized
      2 mars 2020 à 12 h 52
      #6
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2017
      Messages: 910
      Mentions "j'aime": 208
      Quoting: yikes
      I think it’s Whether you keep Demelo or braun playing. I thought the same thing you thought but then probably Demelo taking a spot ends up making us trade braun anyways

      Edit

      Nvm we have heed in, yes we should have braun just realized


      I was going to say, Vlasic and Braun were a good pair the last few years, if I remember correctly. I get wanting EK65 but man I think it hurt SJ in the long run..
      2 mars 2020 à 12 h 54
      #7
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 5,617
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,763
      Quoting: awatt
      I was going to say, Vlasic and Braun were a good pair the last few years, if I remember correctly. I get wanting EK65 but man I think it hurt SJ in the long run..


      and short run cuz EK has been injured back to back years and is now in the back 9 of his career. Ottawa was smart getting rid of him. even though it meant tanking a couple years.
      awatt a aimé ceci.
      2 mars 2020 à 13 h 9
      #8
      Démarrer sujet
      Bad Take Bot v1.02
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2019
      Messages: 2,683
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,879
      Quoting: yikes


      Quoting: awatt
      I was going to say, Vlasic and Braun were a good pair the last few years, if I remember correctly. I get wanting EK65 but man I think it hurt SJ in the long run..


      Alright totally forgot about him, readjusted the roster accordingly.
      awatt a aimé ceci.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage