Forums/Armchair-GM

Goalie Next Season Krug

Créé par: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Date de création initiale: mar 1, 2020
Publié: 1 mar à 23 h 14
Équipe: 2020-21 Avalanche du Colorado
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
Nichushkin, Valeri22 000 000 $
Jost, Tyson32 500 000 $
Graves, Ryan42 500 000 $
Burakovsky, André55 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
DeMelo, Dylan13 500 000 $
Krug, Torey78 500 000 $
Transactions
COL
  1. Gibson, John
  2. Manson, Josh
ANA
  1. Grubauer, Philipp
  2. Johnson, Erik
  3. Cole, Ian
  4. Byram, Bowen
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
2020
COL
TOR
COL
COL
FLA
COL
2021
COL
COL
COL
COL
COL
COL
2022
COL
COL
COL
COL
COL
COL
COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS BONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2083 500 000 $80 915 595 $0 $2 925 000 $2 584 405 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
COL
Landeskog, Gabriel
5 571 429 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 1
COL
MacKinnon, Nathan
6 300 000 $
C, AD
NTC
UFA - 3
COL
Rantanen, Mikko
9 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 5
COL
Burakovsky, André
5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
COL
Kadri, Nazem
4 500 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 2
COL
Donskoi, Joonas
3 900 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
COL
Calvert, Matt
2 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
COL
Jost, Tyson
2 500 000 $
C, AG, AD
RFA - 1
COL
Compher, J.T.
3 500 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
COL
Bellemare, Pierre-Édouard
1 800 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
COL
Kaut, Martin
863 333 $
AD
RFA - 3
COL
Nichushkin, Valeri
2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Krug, Torey
8 500 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 7
ANA
Manson, Josh
4 100 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 2
ANA
Gibson, John
6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 7
COL
Girard, Samuel
5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 7
COL
Makar, Cale
880 833 $
DD
RFA - 1
COL
Francouz, Pavel
2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
COL
Graves, Ryan
2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
DeMelo, Dylan
3 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 mar à 23 h 17
#1
FireDougWilson
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 9,332
Mentions "j'aime": 3,725
I wish you luck to resign Landeskog and Makar
1 mar à 23 h 19
#2
Démarrer sujet
Rejoint: jan 2020
Messages: 6,377
Mentions "j'aime": 1,452
Quoting: KakkoForMauriceRichardAward
I wish you luck to resign Landeskog and Makar


That's why I put DeMelo on a 1 year contract plus the cap will go up and trades can be made.
1 mar à 23 h 45
#3
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 479
Mentions "j'aime": 145
I just did a Krug to habs for 7x7.5
Hes gonna get quite the contract and I gotta say he'd he a damn good fit in Colorado.
1 mar à 23 h 55
#4
Rejoint: déc 2019
Messages: 2,444
Mentions "j'aime": 1,036
Why? Byram is untouchable and you want to trade 7 yrs of him under cost control for Krug that’s straight cap insanity. Anaheim would have zero interest in Cole or Johnson and you’d have to get EJ to waive his NMC to go to Anaheim that isn’t happening. The Jost contract is an over pay. All these move do is make the Avs older and put them straight into Cap hell.
2 mar à 0 h 27
#5
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,962
Mentions "j'aime": 2,314
Byram looks promising, but he doesn't get you Gibson.
2 mar à 0 h 40
#6
Démarrer sujet
Rejoint: jan 2020
Messages: 6,377
Mentions "j'aime": 1,452
Quoting: Xqb15
Why? Byram is untouchable and you want to trade 7 yrs of him under cost control for Krug that’s straight cap insanity. Anaheim would have zero interest in Cole or Johnson and you’d have to get EJ to waive his NMC to go to Anaheim that isn’t happening. The Jost contract is an over pay. All these move do is make the Avs older and put them straight into Cap hell.


Trading Byram is to get Gibson not Krug.

Quoting: tkecanuck341
Byram looks promising, but he doesn't get you Gibson.


Anaheim wants higher draft picks as they are rebuilding. This trade helps them do it.
2 mar à 2 h 17
#7
Rejoint: jui 2018
Messages: 446
Mentions "j'aime": 227
Ducks decline. Gibson is among the best goalie in the league. And his contract is by far the best among those elite goalies. This package isn't enough for just Gibson. Byram is the only interesting thing. Grubauer maybe a little bit interesting bij Johnson and Cole aren't. But maybe if you add 2020 3rd, 2021 + 2022 1st they might consider it
2 mar à 5 h 26
#8
Rejoint: déc 2019
Messages: 2,444
Mentions "j'aime": 1,036
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Trading Byram is to get Gibson not Krug.

Yeah but that’s the net effect. Also giving Krug that kinda contract makes it next to impossible to give both Landeskog and Makar long term deals.
2 mar à 7 h 31
#9
Go Wings Go
Rejoint: jun 2016
Messages: 27,133
Mentions "j'aime": 5,759
Quoting: Pmanningno2
I just did a Krug to habs for 7x7.5
Hes gonna get quite the contract and I gotta say he'd he a damn good fit in Colorado.


Krug doesn't want to play in Canada, Hence all Canadian teams are on his no trade list.
2 mar à 11 h 44
#10
the_trade_boi437
Rejoint: jan 2020
Messages: 376
Mentions "j'aime": 67
Quoting: DiehardRedWingsFan58
Krug doesn't want to play in Canada, Hence all Canadian teams are on his no trade list.


colorado wont move byram good luck with that trade signing krug is... questionable, the defensive pair is fine on its own but if you trade ej and like a pick to get a 2nd or 3rd line that would work
2 mar à 11 h 56
#11
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,962
Mentions "j'aime": 2,314
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Anaheim wants higher draft picks as they are rebuilding. This trade helps them do it.


That might be true, but that doesn't mean they're going to trade away an elite goaltender who is locked up long term to a team friendly contract for significantly less than he's worth, and then throw in Manson too.

This trade is heavily lopsided towards Colorado.
2 mar à 14 h 30
#12
Démarrer sujet
Rejoint: jan 2020
Messages: 6,377
Mentions "j'aime": 1,452
Quoting: tkecanuck341
That might be true, but that doesn't mean they're going to trade away an elite goaltender who is locked up long term to a team friendly contract for significantly less than he's worth, and then throw in Manson too.

This trade is heavily lopsided towards Colorado.


Maybe Colorodo throws in a first. Its not far off though. I think you underestimate Byram.
2 mar à 14 h 32
#13
Démarrer sujet
Rejoint: jan 2020
Messages: 6,377
Mentions "j'aime": 1,452
Quoting: Xqb15


I'd rather Krug over Landeskog. You can always trade to make cap space too.
2 mar à 15 h 01
#14
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,962
Mentions "j'aime": 2,314
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Maybe Colorodo throws in a first. Its not far off though. I think you underestimate Byram.


Byram has tons of potential, but has done absolutely nothing in the NHL yet. Gibson, on the other hand, is the only reason why the Ducks don't look like the Red Wings right now. He is a top 3 goaltender in the NHL, if not the best.

Add a 1st and an A prospect and drop Manson from the trade and the Ducks might consider it.
2 mar à 15 h 26
#15
Rejoint: déc 2019
Messages: 2,444
Mentions "j'aime": 1,036
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
I'd rather Krug over Landeskog. You can always trade to make cap space too.


Why? The Avs are in the enviable position of having young talent on team friendly deals (for now) and more young talent coming. You give a guy like Krug that much money you would expect him to be the #1 d running the PP, the Avs already have Makar and they have Byram coming. It’s redundant and expensive. I like Krug but it isn’t a move the Avs would make.
2 mar à 15 h 44
#16
Démarrer sujet
Rejoint: jan 2020
Messages: 6,377
Mentions "j'aime": 1,452
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Byram has tons of potential, but has done absolutely nothing in the NHL yet. Gibson, on the other hand, is the only reason why the Ducks don't look like the Red Wings right now. He is a top 3 goaltender in the NHL, if not the best.

Add a 1st and an A prospect and drop Manson from the trade and the Ducks might consider it.


He has a .904 save percentage not a .940 save percentage...
2 mar à 15 h 57
#17
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,962
Mentions "j'aime": 2,314
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
He has a .904 save percentage not a .940 save percentage...


He also plays for perhaps the worst team in the league, ranked 30th in goal scoring and dead last in PP%, but is still able to keep them out of the league cellar and with decent defensive metrics.

I'm not even a Ducks fan, but I understand that Gibson is probably the best goaltender in the league right now.
2 mar à 22 h 20
#18
Démarrer sujet
Rejoint: jan 2020
Messages: 6,377
Mentions "j'aime": 1,452
Quoting: tkecanuck341
He also plays for perhaps the worst team in the league, ranked 30th in goal scoring and dead last in PP%, but is still able to keep them out of the league cellar and with decent defensive metrics.

I'm not even a Ducks fan, but I understand that Gibson is probably the best goaltender in the league right now.


I don't even think he's top 5 right now. He hasn't been having a good season. Probably his worst season since entering the NHL. Shesterkin has been a beast this season.
3 mar à 15 h 28
#19
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 4,962
Mentions "j'aime": 2,314
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
I don't even think he's top 5 right now. He hasn't been having a good season. Probably his worst season since entering the NHL. Shesterkin has been a beast this season.


We'll have to agree to disagree. If I could pick one goaltender (age and contract considered) to start a franchise, I would choose Gibson over any other goaltender in the league.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Supprimer une option
Soumettre le sondage