Quoting: Subbanator7667
Poehling hasnt played on the 3rd line in Laval, he has played top 6 there and bottom 6 in MTL. They literally just moved Varone and that other vet out because he was out playing them and they wanted more minutes over him.
Kulak actually has rounded out to be a good NHL dman with Petry, his time in Laval did help him when he struggled this year.
And he brings up Fleury because he has improved, he made the team out of camp and tired out as most developing rookies do, and now Laval has a playoff chance so they're keeping him down there.
Caufield absolutely needs to get out of Wisconsin and Laval would be the best place for him.
Do you even read articles or research whatsoever before providing your opinion?
1. Poehling has played 3rd line in Laval. The reason we traded Varone and Barber was because of their attitudes, it had nothing to do with their play. You would know this if you even read one article in the last 2 weeks about Laval.
2. Kulak's stats are worse than last year. He's a #6 defender all day long. The only reason he is playing with Petry is because we simply don't have any quality LHD to play with Petry. If you think he's a "quality" defensemen, then it's going to be a tough reality when we trade him for a 5th or 6th round pick when Romanov comes over.
3. You're right that Fleury has improved, but Fleury nearly made the team out of camp last year so it's not like Bouchard turned him from a nobody to an NHL defensemen. It's good to see our prospects improving.
4. If we sign Caufield this year, what do the lines look like? You also have to remember Caufield is 5'7" 160LBS and the AHL is an even more physical league than the NHL.