SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

This is what Canucks will look like in 2020-2021

Créé par: Canucks_Hawkey
Équipe: 2020-21 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 27 févr. 2020
Publié: 28 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Pretty much every GM scenario I've considered points to Loui Eriksson having to be traded this offseason. In years past it was doable to keep Eriksson's contract on the books, but not this year because Canucks will be squeezing every dollar they can get to meet the 23 man starting season roster. Prospects like Lind, Gadjovich, Juolevi and Mcewen are on the roster as hopefuls but not all expected to be on the team. Canucks will likely sign low cost free agents to fill the bottom gaps. If Toffoli will take Brock Boeser cap hit at 7 years I think Benning will resign Toffoli, otherwise he will likely be a free agent.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
31 000 000 $
3925 000 $
22 250 000 $
13 500 000 $
11 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
45 000 000 $
45 000 000 $
75 875 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (DET)
DET
  1. Eriksson, Loui
  2. Virtanen, Jake
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (VAN)
2.
VAN
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2021 (ANA)
ANA
  1. Benn, Jordie (500 000 $ retained)
3.
VAN
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (MTL)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (MTL)
MTL
  1. Roussel, Antoine (500 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de DET
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de MTL
Logo de VAN
Logo de ANA
Logo de VAN
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de MTL
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $81 415 210 $1 700 000 $4 957 500 $84 790 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 850 000 $$3M)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 375 000 $4 375 000 $
AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
783 333 $783 333 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 666 $891 666 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 févr. 2020 à 16 h 1
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
Please do not give Toffoli 7 years. Sutter has lost his 3C job to Gaudette. Ferland also is likely to ride the cruise to LTIRsland next year.

I really don't want to pay Stecher that much either.... he isn't that good.
28 févr. 2020 à 16 h 10
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 6,103
Mentions "j'aime": 2,240
I'd imagine that Roussel trade is for any team, but I don't think Montreal would have any interest in him.
Canucks_Hawkey a aimé ceci.
28 févr. 2020 à 16 h 15
#3
Démarrer sujet
Executive Director
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 50
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: Wqrrior
Please do not give Toffoli 7 years. Sutter has lost his 3C job to Gaudette. Ferland also is likely to ride the cruise to LTIRsland next year.

I really don't want to pay Stecher that much either.... he isn't that good.


I gave Toffoli 7 years because that's probably the minimum term he'd sign for. 5.875M cap hit is reasonable if he can maintain near a PPG pace down the stretch. Kreider is a fair comparison but I doubt anyone would give Toffoli more than 6M.

We'll see what happens with Ferland but he's in the same situation as Andrew Shaw in Chicago. I hope they come back.

I'm not convinced Stetch is a top 4 defenseman but the going rate for a tweener top 4/top 6 defenseman is between 3-4M. They should resign him for another year because whose going to replace him at this point? He's done a good job in his role but he wants a bigger role and probly more money at least. I say sign him for a year and let him walk the following season. Woo might be ready by then.
28 févr. 2020 à 16 h 17
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
Quoting: Canucks_Hawkey
I gave Toffoli 7 years because that's probably the minimum term he'd sign for. 5.875M cap hit is reasonable if he can maintain near a PPG pace down the stretch. Kreider is a fair comparison but I doubt anyone would give Toffoli more than 6M.

We'll see what happens with Ferland but he's in the same situation as Andrew Shaw in Chicago. I hope they come back.

I'm not convinced Stetch is a top 4 defenseman but the going rate for a tweener top 4/top 6 defenseman is between 3-4M. They should resign him for another year because whose going to replace him at this point? He's done a good job in his role but he wants a bigger role and probly more money at least. I say sign him for a year and let him walk the following season. Woo might be ready by then.


If we have to give Tyler 7 years then we should walk. It's tough to let players go, but we also need to consider what will look bad later. Tyler has never been an elite point producer, and normally hovers around 50. Kreider has long had the one-up, and even his contract was seen as steep.

I like that cap hit, but at no more than 4 years.
Canucks_Hawkey a aimé ceci.
28 févr. 2020 à 16 h 38
#5
Démarrer sujet
Executive Director
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 50
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Quoting: Wqrrior
If we have to give Tyler 7 years then we should walk. It's tough to let players go, but we also need to consider what will look bad later. Tyler has never been an elite point producer, and normally hovers around 50. Kreider has long had the one-up, and even his contract was seen as steep.

I like that cap hit, but at no more than 4 years.


Miller wasn't expected to be a PPG player either but now he's probly one of the top 10-20 forwards in the NHL right now. If Toffoli goes cold and his point total drops between now and the end of the season, then he can walk. As of now though 6 points in 4 games with 4 goals looks very very good and he could easily continue that with the talent on the team. In LA all he had was Doughty and Kopitar to produce with. He scores big goals against good teams which is hard to find. You're probly right though that he only has 3-5 years of being a 50+ point player. After that he might be the next Loui Eriksson.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage