SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Super Weird Idea

Équipe: 2019-20 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 27 févr. 2020
Publié: 28 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Ok, so this is just a really weird thing that I was thinking about and there may even be a rule against it that I'm unaware of but I just decided to post it just to get some thoughts.

SITUATION: So this type of thing would not apply very often, as it takes a pretty specific scenario for it to make sense. The idea is RENTING/LOANING players with TERM. Basically where this would make sense is when a team that expected to make the playoffs fell out of the race for one reason or another (i.e injuries, bad goaltending, etc.) but thinks they will rebound the following season or a team that wasn't quite good enough but was still developing young players wants to be able to make a push next year.

HOW IT WORKS: So if a team is in the situation described above, they won't want to trade away from their roster in a way that hurts their team the following year, but they also don't want to finish out of the playoffs without recouping assets. So what I am proposing is loaning players with term for only the remainder of the season. Teams would make a handshake agreement that the player will be traded back to the original team in the summer. Collateral would be sent as part of the deadline deal and then given back in the summer trade.

EXAMPLE: Basic idea of what I mean below. The point is not the value, just the theory. This theoretical deal would take place at this past deadline.
Transactions
MTL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2020 (TOR)
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
Picks are sent to MTL. Two 2nds for Danault for the remainder of the season and playoffs. 1st for collateral. Once the summer rolls around the Leafs send Danault back to MTL, and get their first back.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TOR
Logo de VGK
Logo de VGK
Logo de TOR
Logo de CAR
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
2021
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $80 318 532 $0 $400 000 $1 181 468 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 634 000 $11 634 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 893 000 $10 893 000 $
AD
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 083 333 $3 083 333 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
700 000 $700 000 $
C, AD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
675 000 $675 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
894 167 $894 167 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
28 févr. 2020 à 0 h 43
#1
GM - Canucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 5,192
Mentions "j'aime": 1,218
Interesting concept but not sure what the player being traded or his teammates or his team's fan base would think of this type of deal as the team is really giving up on its season even if it is getting back assets. Suspect it would also upset other teams who are competing for a playoff spot with the team that is receiving a reinforcement player and could hurt the entire entegrity of the NHL and its teams and GM's and all of these type of deals could be questioned.
28 févr. 2020 à 0 h 54
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,716
Mentions "j'aime": 5,221
Quoting: TMLSage
Interesting concept but not sure what the player being traded or his teammates or his team's fan base would think of this type of deal as the team is really giving up on its season even if it is getting back assets. Suspect it would also upset other teams who are competing for a playoff spot with the team that is receiving a reinforcement player and could hurt the entire entegrity of the NHL and its teams and GM's and all of these type of deals could be questioned.


I get the teammate/fan base angle, that would suck to see that your team is calling it. However I disagree with the other teams/integrity of the NHL points. If trades like these became normalized, there would be no reason for other teams to complain as these types of deals would be open to anyone.
28 févr. 2020 à 0 h 59
#3
GM - Canucks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2016
Messages: 5,192
Mentions "j'aime": 1,218
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
I get the teammate/fan base angle, that would suck to see that your team is calling it. However I disagree with the other teams/integrity of the NHL points. If trades like these became normalized, there would be no reason for other teams to complain as these types of deals would be open to anyone.


I would be concerned that a GM could have his buddy GM cut a friendly deal to help him out to bring in a player to ensure his team makes the playoffs.
LeafsFanForSomeReason a aimé ceci.
28 févr. 2020 à 1 h 7
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 6,716
Mentions "j'aime": 5,221
Quoting: TMLSage
I would be concerned that a GM could have his buddy GM cut a friendly deal to help him out to bring in a player to ensure his team makes the playoffs.


I don't think the GM's are really THAT close. I can't see a scenario where a GM would not take the offer that is best for his team, regardless of personal relationships with the other GM's. Besides, if that would happen in this scenario, then don't you think it already does happen with traditional rentals. What about this makes it different?

And just to be clear, I'm not saying this is a perfect idea. I literally just came up with it and immediately started typing lol. It is definitely something that would need fine tuning if it ever came into practice, so thanks for the input. It's really helpful to recognizing potential problems.
TMLSage a aimé ceci.
28 févr. 2020 à 1 h 35
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 887
Mentions "j'aime": 334
Quoting: LeafsFanForSomeReason
I don't think the GM's are really THAT close. I can't see a scenario where a GM would not take the offer that is best for his team, regardless of personal relationships with the other GM's. Besides, if that would happen in this scenario, then don't you think it already does happen with traditional rentals. What about this makes it different?

And just to be clear, I'm not saying this is a perfect idea. I literally just came up with it and immediately started typing lol. It is definitely something that would need fine tuning if it ever came into practice, so thanks for the input. It's really helpful to recognizing potential problems.


Look what Poile did to Fenton. What a savage. 😂
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage