SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Per The Lazerus Interview

Créé par: HatterTParty
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 26 févr. 2020
Publié: 26 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I’m gonna apologize off the bat because this is probably the third AGM I’ve made in the same vein in the last week or so.

I’m making this one based on Kane’s comments in an in the athletic to mark lazerus. In it, he stated he wasn’t sure if he’d be willing to compete again by waiting through a rebuild. If Keith were moved, he’d be willing to leave as well. I do wonder if toews would choose to move as well. In this case, I’ll treat it as such.

Be civil and just make it clear why a trade wouldn’t happen.
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Miller, K'Andre [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (CAR)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (NYR)
NYR
  1. Kane, Patrick (4 000 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Reuniting Kane with panarin on Broadway would be amazing. The rangers have made it clear now too that their rebuild is officially over. I completely understand if people think I’m overvaluing Kane, but I hope that’s not the case with how good he still is.
2.
CHI
  1. Noel, Serron
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2021 (FLA)
Détails additionnels:
Conditional pick: if the panthers make the playoffs in 2021 OR Keith plays at least 70 games, hawks receive the panthers 2021 1st round pick.
FLA
  1. Keith, Duncan (1 500 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Keith has proven this year that he can still play. Q still loves him too.
3.
CHI
  1. Bjugstad, Nick
  2. Poulin, Samuel
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (PIT)
Détails additionnels:
Bjugstad serves as a cap dump of shorts. Pittsburgh is definitely trying to squeeze as much out of Crosby and malkin as they can. A 1-2-3 of them and toews would be one hell of a center core.
PIT
  1. Toews, Jonathan (4 000 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Toews certainly isn’t worth what Kane is. However, at 4 M retained, I do think they could get at least a decent return.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de CAR
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de FLA
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2581 500 000 $65 475 724 $0 $7 797 500 $16 024 276 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 5
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
925 000 $925 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 févr. 2020 à 19 h 45
#1
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,776
Mentions "j'aime": 5,734
Kane is still elite and is showing no signs of slowing down. I don’t see the value in it for Chicago, they lose a player that singlehandedly sells tickets, and they don’t get anything to replace that, or anything that could realistically come close to that. Depending on where we pick in the draft, and how smart we are with our trades, our rebuild could be quickly accelerated like the NYR rebuild. I think Kane would want to see that through.

I don’t see Toews as an ideal destination for PIT because he will absolutely not play 3rd line center on any team while he has his good years left. The return is again kinda Meh, and I think we could do better with a team that needs centers.

Keith trade is fine, and I think he would be the most willing to move of the three. As long as we don’t take back Matheson in the trade we are gold.
26 févr. 2020 à 19 h 47
#2
Isles7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 12,222
Mentions "j'aime": 5,299
damn if Kane was available, Lou would definitely be in on that. I'm pretty sure barzal is one of Kanes favorite players , maybe he would waive to come play with him. it would cost wahlstrom, wilde, 1st and two 2nds IMO.
26 févr. 2020 à 19 h 53
#3
Kyle from Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 9,776
Mentions "j'aime": 5,734
Quoting: Isles777
damn if Kane was available, Lou would definitely be in on that. I'm pretty sure barzal is one of Kanes favorite players , maybe he would waive to come play with him. it would cost wahlstrom, wilde, 1st and two 2nds IMO.


I think you know in your heart of hearts it starts with Dobson.
26 févr. 2020 à 19 h 54
#4
Isles7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 12,222
Mentions "j'aime": 5,299
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
I think you know in your heart of hearts it starts with Dobson.


I was just doing my best attempt at a realistic bowman trade
Jco5ta5 a aimé ceci.
26 févr. 2020 à 19 h 57
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Stan_Bowman
Kane is still elite and is showing no signs of slowing down. I don’t see the value in it for Chicago, they lose a player that singlehandedly sells tickets, and they don’t get anything to replace that, or anything that could realistically come close to that. Depending on where we pick in the draft, and how smart we are with our trades, our rebuild could be quickly accelerated like the NYR rebuild. I think Kane would want to see that through.

I don’t see Toews as an ideal destination for PIT because he will absolutely not play 3rd line center on any team while he has his good years left. The return is again kinda Meh, and I think we could do better with a team that needs centers.

Keith trade is fine, and I think he would be the most willing to move of the three. As long as we don’t take back Matheson in the trade we are gold.


Like the input! Agree with the Keith assessment and the more I think about toews, I do agree he would wanna be a top two center anywhere he’s goes.

As for Kane, while I do agree with you idea of his value, where I don’t agree is the rebuild idea. NYR had significantly different circumstances surrounding their rebuild and didn’t have (in my opinion) the kind of cap problems we have. Our issues revolve around our best players being an anchor because of their deals. However, it is made easier by drafting smart, and again, that’s where I believe the hawks fail. We haven’t had enough of an impact from our prospects in recent years (cat aside) to depend on just one 1st round pick. This scouting and management has constantly shown that this is becoming a growing problem. I do agree, again, that drafting smart fixes everything. But the hawks don’t have a good track record of that, and on top of it, their development team has been very, very bad at getting players nhl ready.
26 févr. 2020 à 19 h 58
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Isles777
I was just doing my best attempt at a realistic bowman trade


Quoting: Stan_Bowman
I think you know in your heart of hearts it starts with Dobson.


With bowman in charge, I agree that isles777’s first offer would happen. But I do agree that it should start with Dobson. That being said, I wouldn’t hate wahlstrom, Wilde, a 1st and a 2nd
Isles777 a aimé ceci.
26 févr. 2020 à 20 h 0
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,185
Mentions "j'aime": 4,793
The return on kane is underwhelming and I don't think that retaining all that money is in the best interest of the team. Especially on Kane, I don't think we need to retain to move him and no way we need to retain close to 40% of Toew's deal to move him. I do agree that this team needs a rebuild but we could get more for Kane and Toews and save more money while doing so. You only move Franchise level pieces is the return is right I don't want to make a move just to make a move. The Kieth deal is good.
Jco5ta5 a aimé ceci.
26 févr. 2020 à 20 h 1
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Wadejos123
The return on kane is underwhelming and I don't think that retaining all that money is in the best interest of the team. Especially on Kane, I don't think we need to retain to move him and no way we need to retain close to 40% of Toew's deal to move him. I do agree that this team needs a rebuild but we could get more for Kane and Toews and save more money while doing so. You only move Franchise level pieces is the return is right I don't want to make a move just to make a move. The Kieth deal is good.


Ya see, that’s what I thought as well, but the voice in my head kept telling me that contending teams just don’t have cap space to take on 10.5 M a piece. Plus, retention generally helps get more return.
26 févr. 2020 à 20 h 8
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,185
Mentions "j'aime": 4,793
I think that non-contneders would still have interest as well. Kane still has many years of playing at a high high level left in him. He's not a 1-2 year rental by any means. Middle of the pack teams would deffintly still have intrest. Of course, Kane would have to waive to go wherever we send him
HatterTParty a aimé ceci.
26 févr. 2020 à 20 h 20
#10
Lets Go Blues
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 6,749
Mentions "j'aime": 4,320
Seems like too many years to retain that much money. The rebuild already has some good pieces, what if it's accelerated and there is 9.5m or more in dead money?
26 févr. 2020 à 22 h 18
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: Wadejos123
I think that non-contneders would still have interest as well. Kane still has many years of playing at a high high level left in him. He's not a 1-2 year rental by any means. Middle of the pack teams would deffintly still have intrest. Of course, Kane would have to waive to go wherever we send him


That’s where I think the difference is made. You said it perfectly, he would have to waive, and I genuinely think it would only happen for a true contender.
26 févr. 2020 à 22 h 23
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 2,350
Mentions "j'aime": 851
Quoting: A_K
Seems like too many years to retain that much money. The rebuild already has some good pieces, what if it's accelerated and there is 9.5m or more in dead money?


That is a good thought. The only way I would respond is that having seabrook around, even if he’s playing, still constitutes almost 7 M in dead money. Suffice to say he just doesn’t belong in the modern nhl anymore. As for the rebuild having good pieces already, I do think it does on offense. My problem is the lack of hard nosed, but also puck moving defensive dmen. We haven’t had that since hammer and oduya left. Mix that in with the unclear direction of goaltending, and I’m sure where the team is heading.

As a personal criticism of this team, they just don’t battle and put in 100% effort the way they used to. That’s half the battle. They could be oozing talent and show no effort and that negates everything. Toronto anyone?
27 févr. 2020 à 5 h 30
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,304
Mentions "j'aime": 538
Can you please link the article you are talking about?
27 févr. 2020 à 10 h 39
#14
Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,598
Modifié 27 févr. 2020 à 12 h 25
Quoting: HatterTParty
Like the input! Agree with the Keith assessment and the more I think about toews, I do agree he would wanna be a top two center anywhere he’s goes.

As for Kane, while I do agree with you idea of his value, where I don’t agree is the rebuild idea. NYR had significantly different circumstances surrounding their rebuild and didn’t have (in my opinion) the kind of cap problems we have. Our issues revolve around our best players being an anchor because of their deals. However, it is made easier by drafting smart, and again, that’s where I believe the hawks fail. We haven’t had enough of an impact from our prospects in recent years (cat aside) to depend on just one 1st round pick. This scouting and management has constantly shown that this is becoming a growing problem. I do agree, again, that drafting smart fixes everything. But the hawks don’t have a good track record of that, and on top of it, their development team has been very, very bad at getting players nhl ready.


I’m not so sure that scouting and drafting is a big issue. The issue is Bowman trades them all. There was a post yesterday titled “if Chicago kept all their draft picks”. That team was fricken loaded. Dach was the 4C.

Since Patrick Kane was drafted our first round picks were...
2008: Kyle Beach - never played in NHL. Only Ben Smith from that draft played in NHL.
2009: Dylan Olsen - played total 124 games. Played most in Florida. (Notable from same draft: Pirri, Kruger)
2010: Kevin Hayes - refused to sign with Hawks. Traded rights away. (Notable: Johns, Nordstrom)
2011: Mark McNeill - played 2 whole games. Danault - traded to Montreal in 2016. (notable: clendening, Saad, Shaw, dahlbeck)
2012: teravainen - traded with Bickell to CAR to unload contract. (Notable: hinostroza)
2013: Hartman - traded (though that trade was a win for Bowman). (Notable: Dahlstrom, hayden, motte)
2014: Schmaltz - traded to ARI (possible win in the trade) (notable: Sikura)
2015: no 1st round pick. Only player to play NHL games is Gilbert.
2016: no 1st round pick. Notable: Debrincat
2017: Jokiharju - traded for Nylander. (Notable: Mitchell, Barratt)
2018: Boqvist - has played 36 games. (Notable: beaudin, kurashev, hakkarainen)
2019: Dach - has played 57 games. (Notable: Vlasic, teply)

Bowman has gutted this team of its farm system or never kept anyone around long enough to develop them and now it’s no surprise the only prospects coming up are bottom 6 and bottom 2 players with exception to Mitchell who should be top 4. Couple that with the two straight years of no first round picks and it really puts things into perspective.
HatterTParty a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage