SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Heretical Idea for Draft Day Trade

Créé par: OldNYIfan
Équipe: 2020-21 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 26 févr. 2020
Publié: 26 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
No apologies here -- I'm an unrepentant Derek Grant fan.

I sure hope Rickard Rakell can play RW.

The trade is based upon the assumption that Florida misses the playoffs and picks somewhere between #12 and #15 and that Braden Schneider is available at that spot. Boston, of course, is locked into nos. 27, 29, 30 or 31.

I'm filling the RhD pipeline in one draft year. Now I don't have to worry about it ever again.

Speaking of pipes, I'll go smoke another, which is why they call it a pipe dream . . .
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2825 000 $
3733 333 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
54 000 000 $
31 500 000 $
31 500 000 $
21 300 000 $
31 200 000 $
31 200 000 $
3900 000 $
2900 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
31 500 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Holtz, Alexander
3925 000 $
Schneider, Braden
3925 000 $
Grans, Helge
3833 333 $
Transactions
ANA
  1. Weegar, MacKenzie [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (FLA)
FLA
  1. Lindholm, Hampus
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2020 (BOS)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de FLA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2883 500 000 $72 166 888 $0 $265 000 $11 333 112 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
820 000 $820 000 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 6
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
745 000 $745 000 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
772 500 $772 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 févr. 2020 à 14 h 44
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 250
Mentions "j'aime": 60
Did you mean Theoretical???
26 févr. 2020 à 15 h 12
#2
Démarrer sujet
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,106
Mentions "j'aime": 25,020
Quoting: FantasySens
Did you mean Theoretical???


My Anaheim colleagues would consider it heretical to trade Hampus Lindholm.
FantasySens a aimé ceci.
26 févr. 2020 à 16 h 21
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 325
Mentions "j'aime": 129
Lindholm isn't untouchable (at least he shouldn't be in my opinion) but this trading him just for the sake of trading him. There is zero pressure to move him and if that's going to happen we better get a killer return and this just isn't it. RHD are not that important, not if they aren't a significant upgrade over the player we're moving to get one. I'd be happy to acquire Weeger but not for Lindholm, especially considering how much of a deal he becomes as d-man contracts rise. If we had a young d-man poised to take his spot, I'd gladly trade Lindholm for offensive help but we don't. D-men like Lindholm don't grow on trees.
26 févr. 2020 à 18 h 6
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 472
Mentions "j'aime": 72
I'm a huge fan of Lindholm, and I think there's something here. I think a more even trade would be Weegar, FLA 1st & Tippett for Lindholm. Lindholm is an elite defender and should get a king's ransom.
26 févr. 2020 à 18 h 39
#5
Démarrer sujet
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,106
Mentions "j'aime": 25,020
Quoting: TheJoeMan
Lindholm isn't untouchable (at least he shouldn't be in my opinion) but this trading him just for the sake of trading him. There is zero pressure to move him and if that's going to happen we better get a killer return and this just isn't it. RHD are not that important, not if they aren't a significant upgrade over the player we're moving to get one. I'd be happy to acquire Weeger but not for Lindholm, especially considering how much of a deal he becomes as d-man contracts rise. If we had a young d-man poised to take his spot, I'd gladly trade Lindholm for offensive help but we don't. D-men like Lindholm don't grow on trees.


You've overlooked the value of moving from 27th overall to 13th.
26 févr. 2020 à 18 h 43
#6
Démarrer sujet
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,106
Mentions "j'aime": 25,020
Quoting: Christian17
I'm a huge fan of Lindholm, and I think there's something here. I think a more even trade would be Weegar, FLA 1st & Tippett for Lindholm. Lindholm is an elite defender and should get a king's ransom.


I was thinking along those lines but getting both a first and a first-value plus Weegar is too much. I think the actual range is somewhere between Weegar, the move up in the draft and Owen Tippett for Lindholm (high) to Weegar, the move up in the draft and Serron Noel for Lindholm and Antoine Morand (low), but I was trying not to set the Panthers fans off.
26 févr. 2020 à 18 h 56
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 325
Mentions "j'aime": 129
Quoting: OldNYIfan
You've overlooked the value of moving from 27th overall to 13th.


No I haven't. After the top of the draft there usually isn't a huge drop off in that range of players. Never mind the fact that is doesn't make up for the difference between Lindholm and Weeger. Unless we get totally screw in the draft lottery and/or go on an annoying run here at the end. we're going to end up with a top-5 pick. We've going to get a very talented teenager, not to mention our second will be really strong as well. But moving up 14 spots in the middle of the first round is not worth making this trade.
mytduxfan a aimé ceci.
27 févr. 2020 à 5 h 21
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Yeah, we're not trading Lindholm. This Weegar kid is getting massively overhyped. Huge downgrade on Lindholm. The difference definitely isn't moving up a few spots in the draft, especially just to go from 25-30 to 12-15.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
27 févr. 2020 à 9 h 45
#9
Démarrer sujet
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,106
Mentions "j'aime": 25,020
Quoting: mytduxfan
Yeah, we're not trading Lindholm. This Weegar kid is getting massively overhyped. Huge downgrade on Lindholm. The difference definitely isn't moving up a few spots in the draft, especially just to go from 25-30 to 12-15.


Thanks for your input. You know I value your opinion.
mytduxfan a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage