SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Nylander for Burns with 2mil retained and a 1st

Créé par: CheechYou
Équipe: 2020-21 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 25 févr. 2020
Publié: 25 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
43 800 000 $
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1950 000 $
1950 000 $
21 500 000 $
1950 000 $
32 750 000 $
33 000 000 $
33 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
SJS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2021 (PHI)
2.
TOR
  1. Burns, Brent (2 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2021 (SJS)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de TBL
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de OTT
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
2021
Logo de SJS
Logo de PIT
Logo de WSH
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de PHI
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2022
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2383 000 000 $77 957 365 $0 $597 500 $5 042 635 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
763 333 $763 333 $ (Bonis de performance20 000 $$20K)
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
C
UFA - 2
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
700 000 $700 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
768 333 $768 333 $ (Bonis de performance65 000 $$65K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
950 000 $950 000 $
DD
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 févr. 2020 à 2 h 32
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,449
Mentions "j'aime": 6,101
GMDW signed that contract, now he's going to have to live with it until it expires.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
25 févr. 2020 à 2 h 47
#2
G O S I M E K
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 930
Mentions "j'aime": 368
Quoting: tkecanuck341
GMDW signed that contract, now he's going to have to live with it until it expires.

If Bobby Ryan can be traded, so can Burns. Bad contracts are exchanged all the time. Thing is, Burns can still play. The Nucks took a bad contract in Eriksson. It happens. Burns is 5 times the player Eriksson is though
25 févr. 2020 à 3 h 5
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,437
Mentions "j'aime": 10,014
Quoting: Baphomet
If Bobby Ryan can be traded, so can Burns. Bad contracts are exchanged all the time. Thing is, Burns can still play. The Nucks took a bad contract in Eriksson. It happens. Burns is 5 times the player Eriksson is though


Fair Point about exchanging bad contracts, but of all teams, the Leafs aren't eating any bad contracts any time soon. If anything they are gonna start dumping at least one maybe two contracts for picks and prospects soon. They have entered and will continue to be in cap hell for a while.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
25 févr. 2020 à 5 h 6
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 148
Mentions "j'aime": 47
Quoting: Baphomet
If Bobby Ryan can be traded, so can Burns. Bad contracts are exchanged all the time. Thing is, Burns can still play. The Nucks took a bad contract in Eriksson. It happens. Burns is 5 times the player Eriksson is though


True. Bad contracts can be moved... but likely not in exchange for one of the other teams best young players and perhaps best contracts. That doesn't happen. You could see a Subban/Weber type deal, though.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
25 févr. 2020 à 7 h 25
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
laugh William Nylander for an aging Brent Burns, Any GM would be a moron to make that trade.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
25 févr. 2020 à 9 h 4
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,797
Mentions "j'aime": 564
Quoting: Lovie_Smith
Fair Point about exchanging bad contracts, but of all teams, the Leafs aren't eating any bad contracts any time soon. If anything they are gonna start dumping at least one maybe two contracts for picks and prospects soon. They have entered and will continue to be in cap hell for a while.


Disagree about the Leafs being in "cap hell." They don't have a ton of room but after their LTIR contracts expire this summer they will be in much better shape. They have tons of players under contract with predictable cap hits and money to resign their RFA's this year. They aren't going to be bidding for top dollar UFA's this offseason, but how many contending teams can do that anyway? The Lightning have a much worse cap situation with valuable RFA's left unsigned and no money for them. They have player with big cap hits who don't live up to them, all the Leafs big money players are their best players. They made the necessary moves last offseason to get rid of Marleau's contract as well as Zaitsev and Brown, ensuring they are not "wasting" cap hits on players who don't live up to them.

Regardless of your take on their cap situation, this is an absolutely awful trade that makes Toronto worse, so they are not interested in doing it.
25 févr. 2020 à 12 h 41
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,437
Mentions "j'aime": 10,014
Quoting: newballcoach
Disagree about the Leafs being in "cap hell." They don't have a ton of room but after their LTIR contracts expire this summer they will be in much better shape. They have tons of players under contract with predictable cap hits and money to resign their RFA's this year. They aren't going to be bidding for top dollar UFA's this offseason, but how many contending teams can do that anyway? The Lightning have a much worse cap situation with valuable RFA's left unsigned and no money for them. They have player with big cap hits who don't live up to them, all the Leafs big money players are their best players. They made the necessary moves last offseason to get rid of Marleau's contract as well as Zaitsev and Brown, ensuring they are not "wasting" cap hits on players who don't live up to them.

Regardless of your take on their cap situation, this is an absolutely awful trade that makes Toronto worse, so they are not interested in doing it.


They will have MAYBE 6mil to sign 3 or 4 players. And I assume they are not going to want to let all of Barrie, Ceci, Clifford, and Spezza just walk, that isn't even considering their RFA class. Most of which are due for considerable raises. I don't know anything about their prospects though. But regardless it is going to be difficult. And correct me if I am mistaken, but aren't they going to have some overages/bonuses from this season to compensate for on next seasons cap hit? They do not have it easy in the cap maneuverability department and they are going to have to pull some interesting stuff to do it. Probably including moving one of their big 3 contracts, nylander, or Kapanen. You are only thinking about the next season. But a GM also has to balance that with the long term and not putting themselves in a position to make desperate moves moving pieces just to get under the cap with garbage return on them, 1 or 2 or 3 years down the road. Then again we are talking about Dubas.
25 févr. 2020 à 12 h 45
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,437
Mentions "j'aime": 10,014
But again, that isn't considering what Seattle takes in the expansion draft and the relief that could bring. And also what prospects they might have that are ready to make the jump on entry level cap hits. One way or another, the cap crunch is gonna hit them eventually. They have a ton of money tied up and futures that are gonna need to get paid as well.
25 févr. 2020 à 13 h 6
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,797
Mentions "j'aime": 564
Quoting: Lovie_Smith
They will have MAYBE 6mil to sign 3 or 4 players. And I assume they are not going to want to let all of Barrie, Ceci, Clifford, and Spezza just walk, that isn't even considering their RFA class. Most of which are due for considerable raises. I don't know anything about their prospects though. But regardless it is going to be difficult. And correct me if I am mistaken, but aren't they going to have some overages/bonuses from this season to compensate for on next seasons cap hit? They do not have it easy in the cap maneuverability department and they are going to have to pull some interesting stuff to do it. Probably including moving one of their big 3 contracts, nylander, or Kapanen. You are only thinking about the next season. But a GM also has to balance that with the long term and not putting themselves in a position to make desperate moves moving pieces just to get under the cap with garbage return on them, 1 or 2 or 3 years down the road. Then again we are talking about Dubas.


I would imagine Barrie and Ceci easily walk. Clifford maybe back on a low money deal, Spezza the same. Their RFA's are all going to come in at 2 mil or under (both of them). It's very likely they move a forward this offseason, even if they don't get a dman in return. I am well aware about the seasons after that, they won't have to do any of the things you are suggesting to get under the cap. They have no bonus issues or rollovers. Just because people want Toronto to be in trouble doesn't mean they are.
25 févr. 2020 à 21 h 17
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 978
Mentions "j'aime": 228
100% bad contracts can be moved. Issue is i'm pretty certain DW is not gonna want to retain 2mil for a player not playing on the team for 5 more years
25 févr. 2020 à 23 h 21
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 148
Mentions "j'aime": 47
Quoting: Lovie_Smith
They will have MAYBE 6mil to sign 3 or 4 players. And I assume they are not going to want to let all of Barrie, Ceci, Clifford, and Spezza just walk, that isn't even considering their RFA class. Most of which are due for considerable raises. I don't know anything about their prospects though. But regardless it is going to be difficult. And correct me if I am mistaken, but aren't they going to have some overages/bonuses from this season to compensate for on next seasons cap hit? They do not have it easy in the cap maneuverability department and they are going to have to pull some interesting stuff to do it. Probably including moving one of their big 3 contracts, nylander, or Kapanen. You are only thinking about the next season. But a GM also has to balance that with the long term and not putting themselves in a position to make desperate moves moving pieces just to get under the cap with garbage return on them, 1 or 2 or 3 years down the road. Then again we are talking about Dubas.


They'll have about 9M free before factoring the cap rising. You can probably get Spezza and Clifford for 2.2 combined. Leaving Mikheyev and Dermott to resign. Probably about 4M combined there (2.8 and 1.1, respectively). Leaves about 2.8 free before factoring any trades. It's not ideal but they have a small bit of wiggle room to maneuver with. Likely one of Kap or Johnsson end up moving for a D, though.

They really just have to get to expansion and the new TV deal.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage