SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Without the scraps

Créé par: Icarus
Équipe: 2019-20 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 24 févr. 2020
Publié: 24 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
We traded the expendables and guys not part of the future. We picked up some RD depth, picks, and a couple of prospects that could still develop. I’m hoping with the team thinned out we can finish low and get a nice top 3. We also have another first round pick that will come late, which the ducks have done well with historically. Let’s see how it goes.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2021
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2022
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $71 531 957 $0 $2 182 500 $9 968 043 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 463 139 $2 463 139 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
874 125 $874 125 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 602 778 $2 602 778 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 050 000 $2 050 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
UFA - 8
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 200 000 $$1M)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 166 $894 166 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
697 500 $697 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
675 000 $675 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 févr. 2020 à 21 h 52
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
Ducks were a real dark horse in this TDL. They won all of their TDL (and surrounding) trades. Heinen and Milano have real chance to become something here
SevenLeg a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2020 à 21 h 59
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: Wqrrior
Ducks were a real dark horse in this TDL. They won all of their TDL (and surrounding) trades. Heinen and Milano have real chance to become something here


Other than the Kase trade
24 févr. 2020 à 22 h 17
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
Quoting: AFOX10900
Other than the Kase trade


That's a pretty big W for the ducks. Anyone who thinks not is stuck in the past. Kase is not a 30 goal scorer.
mytduxfan a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2020 à 22 h 24
#4
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,403
Mentions "j'aime": 2,894
Quoting: Wqrrior
That's a pretty big W for the ducks. Anyone who thinks not is stuck in the past. Kase is not a 30 goal scorer.


I wouldn’t go big W but as a duck fan I think they did fine. Backes lowers the return a bit but a first and a RD prospect is a solid return. If they waive Backes and get a contract termination out of it next season it becomes even better.
Icarus a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2020 à 22 h 37
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
Quoting: Jah1722
I wouldn’t go big W but as a duck fan I think they did fine. Backes lowers the return a bit but a first and a RD prospect is a solid return. If they waive Backes and get a contract termination out of it next season it becomes even better.


you're not doing anything with that cap anyway. Not really desperate for that, no?

You guys should be really pleased with that Heinen trade.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2020 à 23 h 4
#6
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,688
Mentions "j'aime": 24,611
I'll be pleased with any draft slot between 1 and 6.

For Anaheim, cap hits are just Monopoly money, because we have an almost unlimited budget. Not that Alex Pietrangelo is going to sign here, anyway.
mytduxfan a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2020 à 23 h 11
#7
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,403
Mentions "j'aime": 2,894
Quoting: Wqrrior
you're not doing anything with that cap anyway. Not really desperate for that, no?

You guys should be really pleased with that Heinen trade.


I mean it could cause a problem if they decide to spend. Perry’s buyout jumps to $6M next season. That’s $10M in wasted cap space.

The Ritchie trade looks decent on paper but we’ll see. Ritchie’s analytics were solid. Idk what Heinen’s look like but he produces more actual stats.
mytduxfan et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
25 févr. 2020 à 4 h 55
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I'll be pleased with any draft slot between 1 and 6.

For Anaheim, cap hits are just Monopoly money, because we have an almost unlimited budget. Not that Alex Pietrangelo is going to sign here, anyway.


We should get 1st OA because we deserve it. Haven't had a 1st OA pick in our history. #2 in 1994 and 2005 (oh that one hurts so bad). I am praying to the hockey goods on a daily basis.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
25 févr. 2020 à 4 h 56
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: Wqrrior
you're not doing anything with that cap anyway. Not really desperate for that, no?

You guys should be really pleased with that Heinen trade.


Its the only trade I feel a little bit off about. Heinen is just so vanilla. He may have more points, but he was on a better team.
Dan10900 et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
25 févr. 2020 à 6 h 22
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: Wqrrior
That's a pretty big W for the ducks. Anyone who thinks not is stuck in the past. Kase is not a 30 goal scorer.


Backes+Axel=FC's
Kase>Coleman>First
25 févr. 2020 à 6 h 25
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,261
Mentions "j'aime": 2,706
Quoting: Jah1722
I mean it could cause a problem if they decide to spend. Perry’s buyout jumps to $6M next season. That’s $10M in wasted cap space.

The Ritchie trade looks decent on paper but we’ll see. Ritchie’s analytics were solid. Idk what Heinen’s look like but he produces more actual stats.


Heinen's 3 yrs are slightly better, though I haven't looked into it more than that, and according to B's fans his best year was 17-18, and he's been worse ever since, Ritchie's worst year was 17-18 and has been better since
OldNYIfan et mytduxfan a aimé ceci.
25 févr. 2020 à 13 h 50
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 1,457
Mentions "j'aime": 462
Quoting: AFOX10900
Heinen's 3 yrs are slightly better, though I haven't looked into it more than that, and according to B's fans his best year was 17-18, and he's been worse ever since, Ritchie's worst year was 17-18 and has been better since


I have no concerns about Ritchie putting it all together in BOS. He's too much of an idiot for that. I just think Heinen is so "meh". Even Milano for Ritchie would have made more sense, giving up Ritchie to take a flyer on a kid whose shown promise but who hasn't put it all together. Heinen doesn't have any stand out skills and really is unlikely to improve at all because he wasn't in need of a change scenery like a Milano. Essentially, all we can expect is a 30-35 pt guy who is solid defensively. Not bad, but just not that exciting is all.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage