SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline Reactions

Créé par: ForsbergForVezina
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 24 févr. 2020
Publié: 24 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Today was fun honestly, player movement is the best.

I'm pretty neutral towards the Hawks moves. As a fan, I'm glad we kept Saad, I love that guy. I could see him being a long term piece or he gets moved at the draft. I'm fairly open to either option.

The Lehner and Gustafsson trades were definitely underpayments, but I understand why it had to be that way. Demin really doesn't look like anything special and any potential Subban had when he was drafted seems to be gone. I like the pick though, I'm a sucker for 2nd rounders.

I think at this point its top-3 pick or bust, which is gonna be tough because this team is scrappy as all hell and could make a run. But that said, the retool is progressing and that's a good thing
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $54 621 686 $0 $7 665 000 $26 878 314 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 févr. 2020 à 20 h 22
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 840
Mentions "j'aime": 211
Underwhelming return, it seems like Stan waited too long and had better offers on the table.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2020 à 20 h 26
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 3,222
Mentions "j'aime": 2,162
idk, I think anybody in top 7 or 8 is gonna be top 5 talent in any other draft year. I dont think we are in that bad of a spot tbh. I think next year if dcat returns to form, strome improves, kubalik keeps going, we are in the mix for wildcard at the least
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2020 à 20 h 37
#3
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,997
Mentions "j'aime": 2,843
This was an embarrassing deadline. Getting a 2nd for Lehner is a joke. He's a top 10 G in the league, are we seriously getting a 2nd for him? Getting a 3rd for Gustafsson is a slap in the face after having a career season.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2020 à 21 h 11
#4
Démarrer sujet
CHI NYI
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 4,661
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
Quoting: NickC1988
This was an embarrassing deadline. Getting a 2nd for Lehner is a joke. He's a top 10 G in the league, are we seriously getting a 2nd for him? Getting a 3rd for Gustafsson is a slap in the face after having a career season.


He's a rental goalie, I really wasn't expecting a ton in return. I guess now that we know what we're getting I'm a bit disappointed. Like I said, Demin doesn't jump off the screen at me.

Gus hasn't been good this year. Greene, Scandella and Dillon got 2nd round picks for their defense, which Gus just doesn't have. Hopefully we don't get Kempny-ed again
24 févr. 2020 à 21 h 20
#5
hawkman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 686
Mentions "j'aime": 112
Quoting: NickC1988
This was an embarrassing deadline. Getting a 2nd for Lehner is a joke. He's a top 10 G in the league, are we seriously getting a 2nd for him? Getting a 3rd for Gustafsson is a slap in the face after having a career season.


His career year was last year , this year he has been horrible . I have watched pretty much every game so far , this year there are only two or three games that standout out to me where he had a great game . What does stand out in just about every other game is missed assignments in front of his net , misplaying the puck in the corner bad passes and getting caught pinching in to deep and giving up breakaways or two on ones constantly .
24 févr. 2020 à 21 h 20
#6
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,997
Mentions "j'aime": 2,843
Quoting: ForsbergForVezina
He's a rental goalie, I really wasn't expecting a ton in return. I guess now that we know what we're getting I'm a bit disappointed. Like I said, Demin doesn't jump off the screen at me.

Gus hasn't been good this year. Greene, Scandella and Dillon got 2nd round picks for their defense, which Gus just doesn't have. Hopefully we don't get Kempny-ed again


Greene and Scandella can't do much defending, I can't believe Scandella is still in this league at this point. Gus is a PP QB, Carolina's is on IR, why they made a move for Vatanen instead is beyond me. Vatanen is not nearly the QB Gus is.

Gus should've been unloaded in the offseason anyways when you think about it. What did Bowman do to make this team better? Traded for Maatta (Yikes), traded for Nylander (A huge unknown), traded for De Haan (Good price, injury prone), traded for Smith (Overpaid PKer), and signed Carpenter. Why are we expecting a bunch of bottom 6 Fs and average D men were going to carry this team to a playoff spot? Bowman and co. had to know these moves wouldn't make this team a contender, with teams like STL adding Justin Faulk.
24 févr. 2020 à 21 h 22
#7
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,997
Mentions "j'aime": 2,843
Quoting: babouie
His career year was last year , this year he has been horrible . I have watched pretty much every game so far , this year there are only two or three games that standout out to me where he had a great game . What does stand out in just about every other game is missed assignments in front of his net , misplaying the puck in the corner bad passes and getting caught pinching in to deep and giving up breakaways or two on ones constantly .


He's a PP QB. Hell, San Jose was able to get a 2020 1st for Goodrow, a 4th liner. Sure they added a 3rd to incentivize, but a 1st is huge. Why Bowman didn't do that astounds me.
24 févr. 2020 à 22 h 26
#8
Chicago Blackhawks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 1,026
Mentions "j'aime": 408
I have been one of Stan Bowman's staunchest defenders, even in spite of some **** awful trades over time, but this year... Holy hell. After the unacceptable-even-under-the-best-of-circumstances Jokiharju trade, to his blatant bull**** about mishandling his two biggest assets at the deadline, and frankly being a C-U-NextTuesday about Lehner and that whole situation, I want his head on a bloody stake. I want his office cleared out, McDonagh fired out of a cannon, and their cars lit on fire for good measure.
25 févr. 2020 à 9 h 48
#9
Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,614
Mentions "j'aime": 1,635
Quoting: NickC1988
Greene and Scandella can't do much defending, I can't believe Scandella is still in this league at this point. Gus is a PP QB, Carolina's is on IR, why they made a move for Vatanen instead is beyond me. Vatanen is not nearly the QB Gus is.

Gus should've been unloaded in the offseason anyways when you think about it. What did Bowman do to make this team better? Traded for Maatta (Yikes), traded for Nylander (A huge unknown), traded for De Haan (Good price, injury prone), traded for Smith (Overpaid PKer), and signed Carpenter. Why are we expecting a bunch of bottom 6 Fs and average D men were going to carry this team to a playoff spot? Bowman and co. had to know these moves wouldn't make this team a contender, with teams like STL adding Justin Faulk.

I hear you but on paper the team improved quite a bit (except the Nylander part). DeHaan and Maatta are upgrades, Smith was to get rid of Anisimov but he hasn’t been awful, Carpy is an excellent signing in my opinion.

The problem to me is that it didn’t translate on the ice. Which is Colliton’s fault. Look what Torts is doing with CBJ who are basically the Cleveland Monsters at this point. Colliton is not an NHL head coach. Fire him. Hire Gallant.
ForsbergForVezina a aimé ceci.
25 févr. 2020 à 17 h 14
#10
hawkman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 686
Mentions "j'aime": 112
Quoting: Jco5ta5
I hear you but on paper the team improved quite a bit (except the Nylander part). DeHaan and Maatta are upgrades, Smith was to get rid of Anisimov but he hasn’t been awful, Carpy is an excellent signing in my opinion.

The problem to me is that it didn’t translate on the ice. Which is Colliton’s fault. Look what Torts is doing with CBJ who are basically the Cleveland Monsters at this point. Colliton is not an NHL head coach. Fire him. Hire Gallant.
I absolutely agree that colliton has been a disaster . I firmly believe if the hawks had a great coach they would be in the playoffs . The loss of seabrook and dehaan was huge . Dehaan was playing very very well . And seabrook in a reduced role playing 8-12 minutes would have been a huge upgrade instead of having to play KKK , gilbert , seeler , carlsson ,
Jco5ta5 a aimé ceci.
25 févr. 2020 à 17 h 21
#11
hawkman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 686
Mentions "j'aime": 112
Quoting: NickC1988
He's a PP QB. Hell, San Jose was able to get a 2020 1st for Goodrow, a 4th liner. Sure they added a 3rd to incentivize, but a 1st is huge. Why Bowman didn't do that astounds me.


You say why didn't STAN get a first . Obviously if anyone offered a first he would have taken it . So obviously he was not offered a first . The fact that GUS and Lehner were traded at three o'clock which is the deadline tells you he held out for the best offer he got and accepted it . At the end of last season in all my arm chair gm teams i was trading Gus ( one year wonder career year ) for a first and just about everyone on this board was ripping me claiming he was the next boy wonder
25 févr. 2020 à 19 h 7
#12
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,997
Mentions "j'aime": 2,843
Quoting: babouie
You say why didn't STAN get a first . Obviously if anyone offered a first he would have taken it . So obviously he was not offered a first . The fact that GUS and Lehner were traded at three o'clock which is the deadline tells you he held out for the best offer he got and accepted it . At the end of last season in all my arm chair gm teams i was trading Gus ( one year wonder career year ) for a first and just about everyone on this board was ripping me claiming he was the next boy wonder


Nobody was ripping me when I was doing them. Stan waited too long and got caught with his D*** in his hands.
26 févr. 2020 à 13 h 48
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 640
Mentions "j'aime": 162
Quoting: NickC1988
This was an embarrassing deadline. Getting a 2nd for Lehner is a joke. He's a top 10 G in the league, are we seriously getting a 2nd for him? Getting a 3rd for Gustafsson is a slap in the face after having a career season.


My thinking to the Lehner trade as it seems evident he wasn’t signed to an extension in Vegas, is that he wants to be available July 1st ( what the market will bare). Any team in the league is not going offer their 1st and not get more than this remaining season back.

Let’s examine the recent 1st’s given up at this trade deadline.

#1 PENGUINS for Zucker. Zucker is with the Pens for 3 more seasons.
#2 LIGHTNING for Coleman. Coleman is with Tampa next season.
#3 BRUINS for for Kase. Kase is 24 (lots of upside), and has another year with the Bruins
#4 Islanders for Pageau. And for New York to give up the 1st Pageau agreed to an extension. 6 yrs.
#5 LIGHTNING for Goodrow (this trade is suspicious to me. Tampa gave up too much) Goodrow will be with the club next season.
#6 CANES for Skjei. Skjei will be with the Canes for 4 more seasons.

I aptly suggest there was no 1st available for the Hawks to have.

Gustafsson’s value deteriorated since October. The Blackhawks power play is why they aren’t in the playoff race. Gustafsson being the quarterback on the point has to shunt some of the clubs failure. Maybe he will flourish in Calgary. It remains to be seen. But I couldn’t see any team offering any pick higher than a third. This year he did not play well and the market bared it.
ForsbergForVezina a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage