SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Told you Gustafsson wasnt even worth a 2nd rd pick

Créé par: GMs
Équipe: 2019-20 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 24 févr. 2020
Publié: 24 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
You wanted a 1st or 2nd rd pick + another pick but Gustafsson isn't good in the neutral and defensive zone. I'm a MTL fan and after watching 3 Hawks games in a row, I wouldn't trade Brett Kulak for Gustafsson. Hawks should have dealt him last year TDL
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de CHI
Logo de PIT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2021
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de MTL
2022
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $55 414 186 $0 $7 797 500 $26 085 814 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
778 333 $778 333 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance2 475 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 538 462 $5 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 850 000 $3 850 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 333 225 $3 333 225 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
850 000 $850 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
792 500 $792 500 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
775 833 $775 833 $ (Bonis de performance107 500 $$108K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 févr. 2020 à 19 h 42
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
Realistically he should have gone for a 2nd minimum. There were just so many defensemen and CHI made the deal too late. Teams kept choosing other players over him.

MTL is the last fanbase I would let tell me a player's value too... you guys think Lehkonen is worth a king's ransom. LOL
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2020 à 19 h 42
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 840
Mentions "j'aime": 211
To be fair, you don’t know what was offered even a week ago. Last deadline or the draft was the time to trade Gus when his value was at its peak. Definitely a shame but he could really help out Calgary or whoever he signs with in the offseason. He can easily play top 6 minutes and quarterback a powerplay.
GMs et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2020 à 19 h 46
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Quoting: Wqrrior
Realistically he should have gone for a 2nd minimum. There were just so many defensemen and CHI made the deal too late. Teams kept choosing other players over him.

MTL is the last fanbase I would let tell me a player's value too... you guys think Lehkonen is worth a king's ransom. LOL


Lehkonen is a Blake Coleman younger, just look at what NJ got for him at 28
24 févr. 2020 à 19 h 46
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,968
Mentions "j'aime": 733
You completely derailed your argument by saying "I'm a Montreal fan" that carries zero weight around here.
Wqrrior a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2020 à 19 h 47
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Quoting: SmugTkachuk
You completely derailed your argument by saying "I'm a Montreal fan" that carries zero weight around here.


I'm just saying Im not a Hawks fans so Im not watching every Hawks games but when Im watching them Gustafsson isn't good
24 févr. 2020 à 19 h 49
#6
Number 1 Kahun Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 1,598
Mentions "j'aime": 1,010
Scandella, Dillon, and A.Greene got a second+. Gus at 1.2 mil or 50% retained should be 1 2nd. Bowman waited too long and stumbled over himself thinking he was in control. Should have sold when all the dmen were going.
GMs, Wqrrior et ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2020 à 19 h 55
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 6,784
Mentions "j'aime": 1,915
Lol. Hawks fans thought Lehner was worth a 1st plus a great prospect.. even with the majority of his salary retained he didn't get close to it. Can't tell Hawks fans that though LOL
GMs a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2020 à 19 h 58
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
Quoting: Ryminister_27
Lol. Hawks fans thought Lehner was worth a 1st plus a great prospect.. even with the majority of his salary retained he didn't get close to it. Can't tell Hawks fans that though LOL


Wasn't the fans. Bean and a 1st was reported as a rumor outside of CAR.
That price was obviously steep... I think CAR dropped out and the Hawks paniced. There was no goalie market, can't blame them for moving him for whatever they could get.

As for Gus, Even THG said in his analysis of the TDL that a 2nd was expected. The market disappeared as CHI was late to the party.
ChiHawk a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2020 à 20 h 39
#9
Jimmy Stu
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 1,474
Mentions "j'aime": 541
Quoting: GMs
Lehkonen is a Blake Coleman younger, just look at what NJ got for him at 28


Lol, what? Coleman is going to get over 200 shots and 200 hits this year plus over 20 goals. He can also play centre and has taken a lot of faceoffs. Lehkonen started playing a checking role last year so he's checking more but no where near Colemans rate. He also hasn't had more than 12 goals in the last 3 seasons. I'm going out on a limb and saying no one would trade the Coleman deal for Lehkonen. Hell, Coleman shouldn't have got the Coleman trade.
24 févr. 2020 à 20 h 41
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Quoting: CMac66
Lol, what? Coleman is going to get over 200 shots and 200 hits this year plus over 20 goals. He can also play centre and has taken a lot of faceoffs. Lehkonen started playing a checking role last year so he's checking more but no where near Colemans rate. He also hasn't had more than 12 goals in the last 3 seasons. I'm going out on a limb and saying no one would trade the Coleman deal for Lehkonen. Hell, Coleman shouldn't have got the Coleman trade.


No but Lehkonen is definitely worth more than Goodrow so he's worth a 1st + something
24 févr. 2020 à 20 h 45
#11
Jimmy Stu
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 1,474
Mentions "j'aime": 541
Quoting: GMs
No but Lehkonen is definitely worth more than Goodrow so he's worth a 1st + something


I think going by what Tampa traded for those players isn't the best value indicator for what Lehkonen is worth. He's only 'worth' that if someone is willing to pay it
Wqrrior a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2020 à 21 h 0
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
Quoting: Wqrrior
Wasn't the fans. Bean and a 1st was reported as a rumor outside of CAR.
That price was obviously steep... I think CAR dropped out and the Hawks paniced. There was no goalie market, can't blame them for moving him for whatever they could get.

As for Gus, Even THG said in his analysis of the TDL that a 2nd was expected. The market disappeared as CHI was late to the party.


He's trolling as usual Ryminister has been already warned for doing this
Wqrrior a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2020 à 22 h 30
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Quoting: CMac66
I think going by what Tampa traded for those players isn't the best value indicator for what Lehkonen is worth. He's only 'worth' that if someone is willing to pay it


Pretty sure 31 GM would like Lehkonen in there lineup
25 févr. 2020 à 20 h 57
#14
Jimmy Stu
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 1,474
Mentions "j'aime": 541
Quoting: GMs
Pretty sure 31 GM would like Lehkonen in there lineup


Sure, everyone would like an NHL calibur 3rd line winger, but that's not the debate though. The debate is, if Coleman got his package, Lehkonen should get at least that if not more. And I'm saying I believe Tampa was in a special circumstance to overpay, and 2 smart GMs got them to do so. Comparing what they got for him probably isn't the best indication
26 févr. 2020 à 17 h 38
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,042
Mentions "j'aime": 5,158
Quoting: CMac66
Sure, everyone would like an NHL calibur 3rd line winger, but that's not the debate though. The debate is, if Coleman got his package, Lehkonen should get at least that if not more. And I'm saying I believe Tampa was in a special circumstance to overpay, and 2 smart GMs got them to do so. Comparing what they got for him probably isn't the best indication


Brisebois is so a bad GM, signed Gourde for too much, after gave too much to Coburn and trade 3 1st rounders ( Foote was drafted in the 1st rd ) for Coleman and Goodrow ... and signed Bogosian 1.3M ... nice record ...
26 févr. 2020 à 17 h 51
#16
Jimmy Stu
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 1,474
Mentions "j'aime": 541
Quoting: GMs
Brisebois is so a bad GM, signed Gourde for too much, after gave too much to Coburn and trade 3 1st rounders ( Foote was drafted in the 1st rd ) for Coleman and Goodrow ... and signed Bogosian 1.3M ... nice record ...


I wouldn't say so bad but agreed, I haven't liked what he's been doing. They were pretty set up for now and the next 10 years and now its only short term. I get winning a cup is everything, but youre telling me you couldn't get a hard checking forward for a 3rd or 2nd? Weird
GMs a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage