SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

of course blake didnt trade lewis

Créé par: Kopitarr11
Équipe: 2019-20 Kings de Los Angeles
Date de création initiale: 24 févr. 2020
Publié: 24 févr. 2020
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Why couldn't blake trade lewis trade lewis? now prokhorkin will get no playing time
Transactions
LAK
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2020 (SJS)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Frais de résiliation
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2020
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de VAN
Logo de VGK
Logo de LAK
Logo de CBJ
Logo de LAK
Logo de CGY
Logo de SJS
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2021
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de STL
Logo de LAK
Logo de TOR
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
2022
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
Logo de LAK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2181 500 000 $63 056 781 $0 $2 332 500 $18 443 219 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
700 000 $700 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
775 000 $775 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
759 167 $759 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
700 000 $700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
725 000 $725 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
745 000 $745 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
858 333 $858 333 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
675 000 $675 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 900 000 $1 900 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 636 364 $2 636 364 $
AD, C
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 févr. 2020 à 16 h 2
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Or Ryan, or Hutton who are taking playing time away from Bjornfot and Clague who should be getting some NHL games in around this time of year.
Kopitarr11 a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2020 à 16 h 10
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,325
Mentions "j'aime": 2,222
Quoting: Bf3351
Or Ryan, or Hutton who are taking playing time away from Bjornfot and Clague who should be getting some NHL games in around this time of year.


Bjornfot will play at most 6 more games with LA this season. They won't waste a year of his ELC to play more than that, because it can slide a year if he stays under 10 games played in the NHL. With Forbort gone, look for Mikey Anderson to get some time with the big club sooner rather than later.
ZiggyPalffy et Kopitarr11 a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2020 à 16 h 11
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,170
Mentions "j'aime": 286
I would rather have Bjornfot and Clague get some meaningful games during a playoff run than the throw away games that are left this year.
Kopitarr11 a aimé ceci.
24 févr. 2020 à 16 h 12
#4
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,482
Mentions "j'aime": 6,455
I don't have a horse in the Kings' race. As an Oiler fan, I genuinely hate seeing them succeed and have enjoyed the past few seasons where the Kings have toiled.

However: I'm enamored with prospects and how they develop. The Kings have a really good thing going in Ontario, and it's arguably better for guys like Clague to be eating more minutes in a winning environment. This is Bjornfot's first year in North America - he's adjusted phenomenally well - but taking time in the AHL to really work out the minutia of his game only does the Kings more good in the long run. Vilardi seems to be getting exceptional treatment by the organization, but that definitely stems from him being physically ready for the NHL the second his name was called at the draft. He's put in time in order to get his back situated and delaying his rise to the NHL any further isn't going to better prepare him to be a top-six center.

The Prokhorkin usage is interesting, but as someone who has experienced how McLellan operates a roster, he'll probably see some higher usage in due time. The roster blender will come out eventually.

By not trading Lewis, Ryan, or Hutton, you've essentially traded the potential for a few late picks in order to better develop key prospects. The Kings did nothing wrong here.
24 févr. 2020 à 19 h 40
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 209
Mentions "j'aime": 134
Quoting: Bf3351
Or Ryan, or Hutton who are taking playing time away from Bjornfot and Clague who should be getting some NHL games in around this time of year.


I get what your saying but those guys will all still come up and rotate thru the line up. I am kinda surprised that no one came calling for Hutton. But maybe that means Blake wants to keep him. Ryan and Lewis didn’t really shock me they stayed. People have to want them too for them to get traded. I could see all three of those guys back next year. Hutton in the line up. Ryan and Lewis as the spare guys that sit. I would much rather those guys sit then to call up a young guy to sit. All that depends on whose moving up from juniors and from oversees though and whose coming up from Ontario next year. Waivers, # of contracts all that plays into too. Should be an interesting summer
24 févr. 2020 à 20 h 42
#6
Démarrer sujet
La fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 69
Mentions "j'aime": 9
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
I don't have a horse in the Kings' race. As an Oiler fan, I genuinely hate seeing them succeed and have enjoyed the past few seasons where the Kings have toiled.

However: I'm enamored with prospects and how they develop. The Kings have a really good thing going in Ontario, and it's arguably better for guys like Clague to be eating more minutes in a winning environment. This is Bjornfot's first year in North America - he's adjusted phenomenally well - but taking time in the AHL to really work out the minutia of his game only does the Kings more good in the long run. Vilardi seems to be getting exceptional treatment by the organization, but that definitely stems from him being physically ready for the NHL the second his name was called at the draft. He's put in time in order to get his back situated and delaying his rise to the NHL any further isn't going to better prepare him to be a top-six center.

The Prokhorkin usage is interesting, but as someone who has experienced how McLellan operates a roster, he'll probably see some higher usage in due time. The roster blender will come out eventually.

By not trading Lewis, Ryan, or Hutton, you've essentially traded the potential for a few late picks in order to better develop key prospects. The Kings did nothing wrong here.
we actually did lewis is a liability on the ice and is a waste of a roster spot by this our younger guys will not get that much playing time because McLellan doesn't know how to use new players
24 févr. 2020 à 21 h 4
#7
Ban Price trades
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2017
Messages: 6,482
Mentions "j'aime": 6,455
Quoting: Kopitarr11
we actually did lewis is a liability on the ice and is a waste of a roster spot by this our younger guys will not get that much playing time because McLellan doesn't know how to use new players


If Lewis is a liability on the ice, then play him more. Y'all ain't catching a playoff spot at this rate. Secure the tank.
24 févr. 2020 à 21 h 51
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Quoting: Kings989
I get what your saying but those guys will all still come up and rotate thru the line up. I am kinda surprised that no one came calling for Hutton. But maybe that means Blake wants to keep him. Ryan and Lewis didn’t really shock me they stayed. People have to want them too for them to get traded. I could see all three of those guys back next year. Hutton in the line up. Ryan and Lewis as the spare guys that sit. I would much rather those guys sit then to call up a young guy to sit. All that depends on whose moving up from juniors and from oversees though and whose coming up from Ontario next year. Waivers, # of contracts all that plays into too. Should be an interesting summer


No we do not want or need Hutton, Ryan, and Lewis in our line up next year. They are dead weight at this point. Those spots need to go to Bjornfot, Clague, JAD, Turcotte, etc. Assuming they've earned it.
24 févr. 2020 à 22 h 8
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 209
Mentions "j'aime": 134
Quoting: Bf3351
No we do not want or need Hutton, Ryan, and Lewis in our line up next year. They are dead weight at this point. Those spots need to go to Bjornfot, Clague, JAD, Turcotte, etc. Assuming they've earned it.


So you would rather have bjornfot, or clague or jad or any other young guys sitting every game then lewis or Ryan or Hutton? Now I haven’t looked into the waiver situation for next year but all I’m saying is if those guys can go down and play every game I’d rather see that then have them be extras. But obviously if they have to go thru waivers it’s not worth potentially losing them. That’s why I said depending on waivers etc. put if someone is gonna sit I’d rather see Lewis and friends sit then the young guys. I’m not saying I like or want them. But sometimes what’s best calls for some patience
24 févr. 2020 à 23 h 32
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,721
Mentions "j'aime": 2,805
Quoting: Kings989
So you would rather have bjornfot, or clague or jad or any other young guys sitting every game then lewis or Ryan or Hutton? Now I haven’t looked into the waiver situation for next year but all I’m saying is if those guys can go down and play every game I’d rather see that then have them be extras. But obviously if they have to go thru waivers it’s not worth potentially losing them. That’s why I said depending on waivers etc. put if someone is gonna sit I’d rather see Lewis and friends sit then the young guys. I’m not saying I like or want them. But sometimes what’s best calls for some patience


All of the young guys I mentioned would not need to clear waivers. If we are talking about next season then most of those kids will be NHL ready. No need to resign Lewis, Hutton, and Ryan. As far as this season goes, now that Blake did not trade Hutton, Ryan, and Lewis it doesn't make as much sense to bring those kids up. Might as well let them play out their season in the AHL. If they aren't NHL ready next season, Blake can always sign a couple of UFAs, but I think that would be a waste of roster spots.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage