Quoting: bsilk18
Why the hell would they give up Hienen for a roster player if thewir goal was to bring someone else in.
Im right too, as is clear by the TDL passing.
Moron
Disclaimer: this isn’t my ACGM. I didn’t say that the bruins were looking to add Palmieri, although I think they were. I said the bruins would do this deal, and I stand by that. I don’t think the devils do it, because the value for them is bad. A deal not being struck does not make you right, at all, and i find it beyond absurd that you would reach that conclusion. That’s a bit, well, I’ll be nice and go with optimistic. To think you’re right because a deal didn’t get done...man. I wish I had the ability to be that self delusional.
Let’s pretend for a second that I was saying that this would get done, or that the bruins were trying to get this done, or whatever, which i think is what you were saying by saying you’re right? I could be wrong about that though, because it makes absolutely zero sense.
See, sometimes, in the NHL, teams try to make trades, and it doesn’t work. See, there’s a salary cap in the NHL, so sometimes teams will make a move to gain salary cap space so they can try to make another move. Sometimes, they’re able to make that move. Sometimes, they’re not.
@ngikas made a very logical post that was mostly just asking if Ritchie being acquired freed the bruins up to offer up Bjork in exchange for a RW, and you’re acting like everyone kicked your dog when they realize the ideas merit.
Take a lap. Actually, take two.