SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Trades

(BOS/ANA) - Heinen for Ritchie

Who won the trade?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


10 sept. 2020 à 13 h 46
#26
May contain nuts
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 6,611
Mentions "j'aime": 2,016
I hated the trade when it happened, and I still do. Ritchie's not an objectively bad player, but skill is more valuable than grit. Those boneheaded hits are not helping, either.

Now, if Ritchie can stay disciplined, then BOS can still have something to be happy about. But that's a very big if.
Kotkaniemi15 a aimé ceci.
11 sept. 2020 à 8 h 49
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,617
Mentions "j'aime": 2,763
Quoting: EmpressKayla
I hated the trade when it happened, and I still do. Ritchie's not an objectively bad player, but skill is more valuable than grit. Those boneheaded hits are not helping, either.

Now, if Ritchie can stay disciplined, then BOS can still have something to be happy about. But that's a very big if.



honestly, heinen wasnt the solution anyways. it was a win for anaheim because they got the better player but its not like he was ever going to become anything in boston. If ritchie can figure it out (doubtful) he can have a solid role. but right now hes nothing but a 4th line checking winger.
13 févr. 2021 à 19 h 2
#28
Ville Koho
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 547
Mentions "j'aime": 216
Well, well, well how the turn tables
KennyBoi a aimé ceci.
21 févr. 2021 à 15 h 43
#29
May contain nuts
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 6,611
Mentions "j'aime": 2,016
Quoting: Ville__Koho
Well, well, well how the turn tables


I must say I never expected Ritchie to do what he's doing now. As someone who likes the Bruins, I'm glad I was wrong about this trade. Heinen is still a good player, though; ANA has been awful in general, and he is definitely not a problem.
VilleKoho a aimé ceci.
31 mars 2021 à 10 h 16
#30
Ville Koho
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 547
Mentions "j'aime": 216
Quoting: Leafs_and_Sens_Fan
Anyone able to explain this deal?


Nick Ritchie is elite
12 oct. 2021 à 19 h 23
#31
Ville Koho
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 547
Mentions "j'aime": 216
This trade has no winners, just losers. What a sad world.
JGCAHC a aimé ceci.
12 oct. 2021 à 19 h 44
#32
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 33,682
Mentions "j'aime": 20,866
In the end Heinen and Ritchie were not qualified by either team and Toronto took Ritchie and Pittsburgh took Heinen

and so no winners and losers
EsoYeezus69 a aimé ceci.
12 oct. 2021 à 21 h 43
#33
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,415
Mentions "j'aime": 22,630
Quoting: aadoyle
In the end Heinen and Ritchie were not qualified by either team and Toronto took Ritchie and Pittsburgh took Heinen

and so no winners and losers


Just a question if Ritchie his 2.5m X 2 deal with the Leafs. Most first impression the Leafs could have spend that cap better.
Interesting that the the Bruins and Leafs traded UFA LWers. 3.8M X2 Foligno signed by Bruins, and 2.5m X 2 Ritchie. In both cases, I think the players were overpaid.
Leafs and Carolina exchanged UFA goalies. Leafs signed Mrzarek for 3.875 and Carolina signed Freddie Anderson for 4.5m
12 oct. 2021 à 21 h 51
#34
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 33,682
Mentions "j'aime": 20,866
Quoting: palhal
Just a question if Ritchie his 2.5m X 2 deal with the Leafs. Most first impression the Leafs could have spend that cap better.
Interesting that the the Bruins and Leafs traded UFA LWers. 3.8M X2 Foligno signed by Bruins, and 2.5m X 2 Ritchie. In both cases, I think the players were overpaid.
Leafs and Carolina exchanged UFA goalies. Leafs signed Mrzarek for 3.875 and Carolina signed Freddie Anderson for 4.5m


Mrazek is 3.8mill not 3.875mill

Honestly if Ritchie produces the same as he did in Boston and Anaheim during his early year 2.5mill is actually respectable. Considering in a full 82 season he will give you around 30-40 points. With Matthews and Marner may get 50 just through assists lul.

Foligno though yeah thats an overpay. Surprised Bruins gave him that considering his back issues. Heck still surprised hes even still playing with those issues.

As for goaltending Mrazek at 3.8m I feel is pretty respectable. Mrazek as a tandem goalie with Campbell should work out very nicely. In general he was the best choice available next to bringing Freddie back. Cause as we saw trading for a guy like Kuemper would have costed us a 2022 1st and Liligren or something. Now as for Freddie, at 4.5mill that contract will always look bad considering Waddell didnt want to give Ndelkovic 3mill and traded him for practically nothing. Now if Freddie bounces back 4.5mill could be a steal. But with his recent injury history and all these issues I feel steady vezina freddie may be gone forever.
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
12 oct. 2021 à 21 h 55
#35
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,415
Mentions "j'aime": 22,630
Quoting: aadoyle
Mrazek is 3.8mill not 3.875mill

Honestly if Ritchie produces the same as he did in Boston and Anaheim during his early year 2.5mill is actually respectable. Considering in a full 82 season he will give you around 30-40 points. With Matthews and Marner may get 50 just through assists lul.

Foligno though yeah thats an overpay. Surprised Bruins gave him that considering his back issues. Heck still surprised hes even still playing with those issues.

As for goaltending Mrazek at 3.8 I feel is pretty respectable. Mrazek as a tandem goalie with Campbell should work out very nicely. Freddie at 4.5mill will always look bad considering Waddell didnt want to give Ndelkovic 3mill and traded him for practically nothing. Now if Freddie bounces back 4.5mill could be a steal.


Gee, I don't know what the Canes were thinking with Nedelkovic...seemed to be a cost efficient RFA at 3.0m. I like the Mrazek signing as I think was time for Freddie to move on especially at 4.5m. Wish Freddie well.
12 oct. 2021 à 21 h 56
#36
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 33,682
Mentions "j'aime": 20,866
Quoting: palhal
Gee, I don't know what the Canes were thinking with Nedelkovic...seemed to be a cost efficient RFA at 3.0m. I like the Mrazek signing as I think was time for Freddie to move on especially at 4.5m. Wish Freddie well.


Think of it this way

Waddell refused to give

Hamilton 9mill
Ndelkovic 3mill

Yet offer-sheeted KK for 6.1mill and gave Freddie 4.5mill

Seems when it comes to priorities his choices are almost the equivalent to Gambling at a Casino. Lets see if it pays off
palhal a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage